{"id":1135453,"date":"2026-06-18T03:49:45","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T01:49:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T03:49:45","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T01:49:45","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-443","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- continue here with main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>            <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p>        &nbsp;<br \/>\nConseil d&apos;\u00c9tat  <\/p>\n<p>            Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 16 juillet 2024            <\/p>\n<p>No ECLI:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443<\/p>\n<p>No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n<p>A. 239569\/VI-22612<\/p>\n<p>Affaire:<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat 260443 &#8211; March\u00e9s publics &#8211; 16\/07\/2024<\/p>\n<p>Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n<p>\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n<p>Date d&#8217;introduction:<\/p>\n<p>2024-07-17<\/p>\n<p>Consultations:<\/p>\n<p>110 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:08<\/p>\n<p>            Fiche            <\/p>\n<p> Arr\u00eat no 260.443 du 16 juillet 2024 March\u00e9s et travaux publics &#8211; March\u00e9s<br \/>\n        publics D\u00e9cision :  D\u00e9sistement d&apos;instance\n    <\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n<p>CONSEIL D&apos;ETAT\n<\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n<p>DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF &#8211; CONSEIL D&apos;\u00c9TAT &#8211; Arr\u00eats (Conseil d&apos;\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n<p>            Texte de la d\u00e9cision            <\/p>\n<p>ERROR JUPORTARobotRecordLienECLI WARNING ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 no lien 278218 identiques <\/p>\n<p>\n       CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF<br \/>\n       LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA VIe CHAMBRE<br \/>\n       no 260.443 du 16 juillet 2024<br \/>\n       A. 239.569\/VI-22.612<br \/>\n       En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e MAXIMUM SECURITY, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Olivier ESCHWEILER, avocat, rue de Mery 42<br \/>\n       4130 Esneux, contre :<br \/>\n       l\u2019Op\u00e9rateur de transport de Wallonie, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Bruno LOMBAERT, Nicolas CARIAT<br \/>\n       et Anne-Sophie BOUVY, avocats, Central Plaza &#8211; rue de Loxum 25<br \/>\n       1000 Bruxelles.<br \/>\n       Partie requ\u00e9rante :<br \/>\n       la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SECURITAS, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Renaud SIMAR, Sophie BLEUX<br \/>\n       et Louis LEBOUTTE, avocats, rue de la R\u00e9gence 58 bte 8<br \/>\n       1000 Bruxelles.<br \/>\n       &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br \/>\n       I. Objet de la requ\u00eate<br \/>\n       Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 12 juillet 2023, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de :<br \/>\n       \u00ab la d\u00e9cision prise le 26 juin 2023<br \/>\n       &#8211; De consid\u00e9rer l\u2019offre de Securitas NV comme compl\u00e8te et r\u00e9guli\u00e8re ;<br \/>\n       &#8211; D\u2019approuver le rapport d\u2019examen des offres du 23 juin 2023, r\u00e9dig\u00e9 par le Service Achats, le Service Coordination de projets et le Service Exploitation Namur de la Direction Namur-Luxembourg ;<br \/>\n       &#8211; D\u2019attribuer le march\u00e9 au soumissionnaire ayant remis l\u2019offre \u00e9conomiquement la plus avantageuse (sur base du meilleur rapport qualit\u00e9-prix), soit Securitas NV, Font Saint Landry, 3 \u00e0 1120 Bruxelles pour le montant d\u2019offre contr\u00f4l\u00e9 et corrig\u00e9 de \u20ac 249.238,80 H.T.V.A. ou \u20ac 301.578,95 T.V.A.C. pour le march\u00e9 de base et \u20ac 747.716,40 H.T.V.A. ou \u20ac 904.736,84 T.V.A.C. pour le march\u00e9 de ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443<br \/>\n       VI &#8211; 22.612 &#8211; 1\/3<br \/>\n       base avec toutes les reconductions possibles (soit une dur\u00e9e totale de 36<br \/>\n       mois) \u00bb,<br \/>\n       II. Proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       L\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 257.147 du 2 ao\u00fbt 2023 a accueilli la requ\u00eate en intervention introduite par la SA Securitas, a rejet\u00e9 la demande de suspension et a r\u00e9serv\u00e9 les d\u00e9pens (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.257.147).<br \/>\n       L\u2019arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties.<br \/>\n       Mme Muriel Vanderhelst, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note, le 20 septembre 2023, demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 11\/3 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       Par un courrier du 22 septembre 2023, le greffe a inform\u00e9 la partie requ\u00e9rante que la chambre allait statuer en d\u00e9cr\u00e9tant le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande, dans un d\u00e9lai de quinze jours, \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.<br \/>\n       Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.<br \/>\n       III. D\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance<br \/>\n       L\u2019article 17, \u00a7 7, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose qu\u2019il existe dans le chef de la partie requ\u00e9rante une pr\u00e9somption de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance lorsque, la demande de suspension d\u2019un acte ou d\u2019un r\u00e8glement ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e, elle n\u2019introduit aucune demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans un d\u00e9lai de trente jours \u00e0 compter de la notification de l\u2019arr\u00eat.<br \/>\n       La partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019ayant pas introduit de demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans le d\u00e9lai imparti et n\u2019ayant pas non plus demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue, elle est donc pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e l\u00e9galement se d\u00e9sister de son recours.<br \/>\n       IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       La partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.<br \/>\n       VI &#8211; 22.612 &#8211; 2\/3<br \/>\n       PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :<br \/>\n       Article 1er.<br \/>\n       Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance est d\u00e9cr\u00e9t\u00e9.<br \/>\n       Article 2.<br \/>\n       La partie intervenante supporte le droit de 150 euros li\u00e9 \u00e0 son intervention.<br \/>\n       La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les autres d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.<br \/>\n       Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 16 juillet 2024, par la VIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :<br \/>\n       Florence Piret, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f., Vincent Durieux, greffier.<br \/>\n       Le Greffier, La Pr\u00e9sidente,<br \/>\n       Vincent Durieux Florence Piret<br \/>\n       VI &#8211; 22.612 &#8211; 3\/3<\/p>\n<p>Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443\n       <\/p>\n<p>            Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s)              <\/p>\n<p>pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 par:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.257.147         <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Action LOG \nfunction JUPORTARecordLogViewDecision  $iubel_id        : 278218\n                                       $action_type     : VIEW\n                                      &amp;$action_startmt  : 1780639536.0543\n                                      &amp;$action_duration : 56\n                                      &amp;$addressipremote : 103.115.10.116\n                                      &amp;$latitude        : '39.0469000'\n                                      &amp;$longitude       : '-77.4903000'\n                                      &amp;$accuracy        : null\n                                      &amp;$altitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$langue_view     : FR\n--><br \/>\n<!-- Action_duration 56 millisec --><br \/>\n      <!-- end of main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>    <!-- end of division \"page_main\" --><\/p>\n<p>              &#9993; info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n<p>              &copy;&nbsp; 2017-2026&nbsp;Service ICT &#8211; SPF Justice<\/p>\n<p>  <!-- end of division \"conteneur\" --><\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><\/p>\n<p>\n          Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n      <\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa Start --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa End --><\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/juportal.be\/content\/ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443\/FR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#8217;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#8217;onglet Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 16 juillet 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 No R\u00f4le: A. 239569\/VI-22612 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260443 &#8211; March\u00e9s publics &#8211; 16\/07\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#8217;introduction: 2024-07-17 Consultations: 110 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:08 Fiche&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[149305],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[8683,136535,17415,16160,120926],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1135453","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-443","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-ayant","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-demande","kji_keyword-rvsce","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#039;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#039;onglet Conseil d&#039;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 16 juillet 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 No R\u00f4le: A. 239569\/VI-22612 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260443 - March\u00e9s publics - 16\/07\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#039;introduction: 2024-07-17 Consultations: 110 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:08 Fiche...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T01:49:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 16 juillet 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 No R\u00f4le: A. 239569\/VI-22612 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260443 - March\u00e9s publics - 16\/07\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-07-17 Consultations: 110 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:08 Fiche...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-18T01:49:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-443\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.443"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1135453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1135453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1135453"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1135453"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1135453"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1135453"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1135453"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1135453"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1135453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}