{"id":1136440,"date":"2026-06-18T07:02:55","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T05:02:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T07:02:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T05:02:55","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-533","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 août 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 240590\/VI-22689<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 260533 – March\u00e9s publics – 28\/08\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-09-12<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

98 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 21:01<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 260.533 du 28 ao\u00fbt 2024 March\u00e9s et travaux publics – March\u00e9s
\n publics D\u00e9cision : Non lieu \u00e0 statuer\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA VIe CHAMBRE SI\u00c9GEANT EN R\u00c9F\u00c9R\u00c9
\n no 260.533 du 28 ao\u00fbt 2024
\n A. 240.590\/VI-22.689
\n En cause : 1. la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 priv\u00e9e \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e ACTIV\u2019ARCHITECTURE, 2. la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e POPAESCU & CO, 3. la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e ROM SERVICE CONSTRUCT, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Hugo DE GENNES et Patrick THIEL, avocats, chauss\u00e9e de la Hulpe 185
\n 1170 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la ville d\u2019Arlon, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son coll\u00e8ge communal, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Bernard DE COCQUEAU
\n et Fran\u00e7ois PAULUS, avocats, place des Nations Unies 7
\n 4020 Li\u00e8ge.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 27 novembre 2023, la SRL
\n Activ\u2019Architecture, la SRL Popaescu & Co et la SRL Rom Service Construct demandent la suspension, selon la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019extr\u00eame urgence, de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de :
\n \u00ab \u2022 la d\u00e9cision adopt\u00e9e par le Coll\u00e8ge communal de la Ville d\u2019Arlon du 30 octobre 2023, aux termes de laquelle le march\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 la firme AM UMAN \u2013
\n L\u2019EQUERRE (premier acte attaqu\u00e9).
\n \u2022 la d\u00e9cision implicite de ne pas leur attribuer le march\u00e9 (deuxi\u00e8me acte attaqu\u00e9) \u00bb.
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 9 janvier 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation des d\u00e9cisions pr\u00e9cit\u00e9es.
\n VIexturg \u2013 22.689 – 1\/4
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Par une ordonnance du 29 novembre 2023, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 11 d\u00e9cembre 2023.
\n La contribution et le droit vis\u00e9s respectivement aux articles 66, 6\u00b0, et 70
\n de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 du R\u00e9gent du 23 ao\u00fbt 1948 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure devant la section du contentieux administratif du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat ont \u00e9t\u00e9 acquitt\u00e9s.
\n Par des courriers du 6 d\u00e9cembre 2023, les parties ont \u00e9t\u00e9 averties de la remise sine die de l\u2019affaire.
\n Par une ordonnance du 30 mai 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 25 juin 2024.
\n M. Xavier Close, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Baptiste Conversano loco Mes Patrick Tiel et Hugo de Gennes, avocat, comparaissant pour les parties requ\u00e9rantes, et Me Marie Vanderelst loco Mes Bernard de Cocqueau et Fran\u00e7ois Paulus, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie adverse, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendus en leurs observations.
\n Mme Muriel Vanderhelst, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Perte d\u2019objet
\n La d\u00e9cision \u00ab adopt\u00e9e par le Coll\u00e8ge communal de la Ville d\u2019Arlon du 30
\n octobre 2023, aux termes de laquelle le march\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 la firme AM UMAN \u2013
\n L\u2019EQUERRE (premier acte attaqu\u00e9) et \u00ab la d\u00e9cision implicite de ne pas leur attribuer le march\u00e9 (deuxi\u00e8me acte attaqu\u00e9) \u00bb, dont la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution et l\u2019annulation sont demand\u00e9es, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9es par une d\u00e9cision prise par la partie adverse le 4
\n d\u00e9cembre 2023.
\n Cette d\u00e9cision de retrait a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9e \u00e0 tous les soumissionnaires par des courriers recommand\u00e9s d\u00e9pos\u00e9s \u00e0 la poste le 7 d\u00e9cembre 2023. Ces actes de notification ne mentionnent pas les voies de recours ouvertes \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de cette
\n VIexturg \u2013 22.689 – 2\/4
\n d\u00e9cision de retrait ce qui, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 19, \u00a7 2, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a allong\u00e9 le d\u00e9lai de recours de quatre mois.
\n Aucun recours en annulation n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduit contre cette d\u00e9cision de retrait, qui peut aujourd\u2019hui \u00eatre tenue pour d\u00e9finitive. Le recours est d\u00e8s lors sans objet.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n Les requ\u00e9rantes sollicitent la condamnation de la partie adverse \u00e0 une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n La disparition de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9, cons\u00e9quence de son retrait, constitue une forme de succ\u00e9dan\u00e9 d\u2019une annulation contentieuse, de sorte que la partie adverse doit \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme la partie succombante dans ce litige et la partie requ\u00e9rante comme celle ayant obtenu gain de cause, au sens de l\u2019article 30\/1 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat.
\n Il y a d\u00e8s lors lieu de faire droit \u00e0 la demande des requ\u00e9rantes et de leur accorder une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure, liquid\u00e9e \u00e0 son montant de base de 770 euros.
\n Le retrait de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e justifie \u00e9galement que les autres d\u00e9pens soient mis \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer ni sur la demande de suspension, ni sur la requ\u00eate en annulation
\n Article 2.
\n La partie adverse supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 600
\n euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e aux parties adverses.
\n VIexturg \u2013 22.689 – 3\/4
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 28 ao\u00fbt 2024, par la VIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat si\u00e9geant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Xavier Close, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Adeline Schyns greffi\u00e8re.
\n La greffi\u00e8re, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Adeline Schyns Xavier Close
\n VIexturg \u2013 22.689 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 ao\u00fbt 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 No R\u00f4le: A. 240590\/VI-22689 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260533 – March\u00e9s publics – 28\/08\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-09-12 Consultations: 98 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 21:01 Fiche…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[149493],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[16586,21875,96915,17415,100565],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1136440","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-533","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-annulation","kji_keyword-attaque","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-retrait","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 ao\u00fbt 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 No R\u00f4le: A. 240590\/VI-22689 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260533 - March\u00e9s publics - 28\/08\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-12 Consultations: 98 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 21:01 Fiche...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T05:02:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 ao\u00fbt 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 No R\u00f4le: A. 240590\/VI-22689 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260533 - March\u00e9s publics - 28\/08\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-12 Consultations: 98 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 21:01 Fiche...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-18T05:02:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-533\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.533"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1136440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1136440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1136440"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1136440"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1136440"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1136440"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1136440"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1136440"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1136440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}