{"id":1137631,"date":"2026-06-18T08:56:45","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T06:56:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T08:56:45","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T06:56:45","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-577","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 septembre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 240680\/XV-5955<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 260577 – Bien-\u00eatre des animaux – 09\/09\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-09-20<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

84 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 01:33<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 260.577 du 9 septembre 2024 Affaires sociales et sant\u00e9 publique
\n – Bien-\u00eatre des animaux D\u00e9cision : Rejet\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D’\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XVe CHAMBRE
\n no 260.577 du 9 septembre 2024
\n A. 240.680\/XV-5955
\n En cause : N.M., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Faiza EZZARBAOUI, avocat, boulevard de Waterloo 34\/3, 1000 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la commune d\u2019Anderlecht, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son coll\u00e8ge des bourgmestre et \u00e9chevins, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me St\u00e9phane RIXHON, avocat, chauss\u00e9e de Waterloo 868\/4
\n 1180 Uccle.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite, par la voie \u00e9lectronique, le 6 d\u00e9cembre 2023, le requ\u00e9rant demande l’annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision de la partie adverse prise par arr\u00eat\u00e9 du bourgmestre en date du 05.09.2023 et qui arr\u00eate en son article 1 ce qui suit : \u201cla confirmation de la saisie d\u00e9finitive en date du 11 ao\u00fbt 2023 par la police du berger malinois [\u2026] appartenant [au requ\u00e9rant] et ce, pour des raisons de s\u00e9curit\u00e9\u201d \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Le dossier administratif a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9.
\n Un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat le 13 mars 2024. Apr\u00e8s un rappel de notification le 18 mars 2024, le requ\u00e9rant est r\u00e9put\u00e9 avoir re\u00e7u ce m\u00e9moire le 22 mars 2024, en application de l\u2019article 85, \u00a7 13, alin\u00e9a 4 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n XV – 5955 – 1\/3
\n M. Pac\u00f4me Noumair, auditeur adjoint au Conseil d’\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note le 10 juin 2024 demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l’article 14bis du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Par un courrier d\u00e9pos\u00e9 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat le 11 juin 2024, dont la partie requ\u00e9rante a pris connaissance le 17 juin 2024, le greffe lui a notifi\u00e9 qu\u2019il allait \u00eatre fait application de l\u2019article 21, alin\u00e9a 2, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, celle-ci pouvant toutefois demander \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Un courrier similaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, le 20 juin 2024, \u00e0 l\u2019attention de la partie adverse et celle-ci en a pris connaissance le jour m\u00eame.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l’emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d’\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Absence de l’int\u00e9r\u00eat requis
\n L’article 21 des lois sur le Conseil d’\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose, en son alin\u00e9a 2, que \u00ab lorsque la partie requ\u00e9rante ne respecte pas les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus pour l’envoi du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique ou du m\u00e9moire ampliatif, la section statue sans d\u00e9lai, les parties entendues \u00e0 leur demande, en constatant l’absence de l’int\u00e9r\u00eat requis \u00bb. La mention de l’article 21, alin\u00e9a 2, pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite lors de l’envoi \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante d’une copie du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l’article 14bis, \u00a7 2, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante n’ayant pas d\u00e9pos\u00e9 de m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique dans le d\u00e9lai imparti et aucune des parties n’ayant demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue, il y a lieu de constater l’absence de l’int\u00e9r\u00eat requis.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n La partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande. S\u2019agissant du montant de cette indemnit\u00e9, il convient de ramener le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 au montant minimum index\u00e9, soit
\n XV – 5955 – 2\/3
\n 154 euros, en application de l\u2019article 30\/1, \u00a7 2, 2\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D’\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La requ\u00eate est rejet\u00e9e.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros et l’indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 154 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 9 septembre 2024, par la XVe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Marc Joassart, conseiller d’\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Caroline Hug\u00e9, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Caroline Hug\u00e9 Marc Joassart
\n XV – 5955 – 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 No R\u00f4le: A. 240680\/XV-5955 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260577 – Bien-\u00eatre des animaux – 09\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-09-20 Consultations: 84 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 01:33…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[149637],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[24685,7735,17415,149638,99215],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1137631","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-577","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-alinea","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-depose","kji_keyword-memoire","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 No R\u00f4le: A. 240680\/XV-5955 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260577 - Bien-\u00eatre des animaux - 09\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-20 Consultations: 84 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 01:33...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T06:56:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 No R\u00f4le: A. 240680\/XV-5955 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260577 - Bien-\u00eatre des animaux - 09\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-20 Consultations: 84 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 01:33...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-18T06:56:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-577\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.577"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1137631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1137631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1137631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1137631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1137631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1137631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1137631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1137631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1137631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}