{"id":1137856,"date":"2026-06-18T09:42:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T07:42:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T09:42:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T07:42:42","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-613","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- continue here with main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>            <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p>        &nbsp;<br \/>\nConseil d&apos;\u00c9tat  <\/p>\n<p>            Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 septembre 2024            <\/p>\n<p>No ECLI:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613<\/p>\n<p>No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n<p>A. 239911\/VI-22634<\/p>\n<p>Affaire:<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat 260613 &#8211; March\u00e9s publics &#8211; 13\/09\/2024<\/p>\n<p>Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n<p>\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n<p>Date d&#8217;introduction:<\/p>\n<p>2024-09-16<\/p>\n<p>Consultations:<\/p>\n<p>95 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:09<\/p>\n<p>            Fiches 1 &#8211; 2            <\/p>\n<p> Arr\u00eat no 260.613 du 13 septembre 2024 March\u00e9s et travaux publics &#8211; March\u00e9s<br \/>\n        publics D\u00e9cision :  Rejet\n    <\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n<p>CONSEIL D&apos;ETAT\n<\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n<p>DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF &#8211; CONSEIL D&apos;\u00c9TAT &#8211; Arr\u00eats (Conseil d&apos;\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n<p>            Texte de la d\u00e9cision            <\/p>\n<p>\n       CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF<br \/>\n       LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA VIe CHAMBRE<br \/>\n       no 260.613 du 13 septembre 2024<br \/>\n       A. 239.911\/VI-22.634<br \/>\n       En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme KRINKELS, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Olivier ESCHWEILER, avocat, rue de Mery 42<br \/>\n       4130 Esneux, contre :<br \/>\n       BRUXELLES ENVIRONNEMENT, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Charles-Henri de LA VALL\u00c9E POUSSIN, avocat, chauss\u00e9e de Charleroi 112<br \/>\n       1060 Bruxelles,<br \/>\n       Partie intervenante :<br \/>\n       la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme EUROGREEN, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Jean-Fran\u00e7ois DAVREUX<br \/>\n       et Lionel-Albert BAUM, avocats, rue du Lombard 67<br \/>\n       5000 Namur.<br \/>\n       &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br \/>\n       I. Objet de la requ\u00eate<br \/>\n       Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 2 octobre 2023, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision prise le 14 juillet 2023, et dont des extraits ont \u00e9t\u00e9 communiqu\u00e9s par courrier dat\u00e9 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2023, mais adress\u00e9 le 11 ao\u00fbt 2023, de consid\u00e9rer l\u2019offre de la requ\u00e9rante comme irr\u00e9guli\u00e8re et d\u2019attribuer le lot 1 du march\u00e9 ayant pour objet \u201cEntretien des espaces verts \u2013 zone ouest \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 EUROGREEN\u201d \u00bb.<br \/>\n       II. Proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       Un arr\u00eat n\u00b0 257.390 du 21 septembre 2023 a accueilli la requ\u00eate en intervention introduite par la SA EUROGREEN et a ordonn\u00e9 la suspension<br \/>\n       VI \u2013 22.634- 1\/4<br \/>\n       de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.257.390). Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties.<br \/>\n       La contribution et le droit vis\u00e9s aux articles 66, 6\u00b0, et 70 de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 du R\u00e9gent du 23 ao\u00fbt 1948 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure devant la section du contentieux administratif du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat ont \u00e9t\u00e9 acquitt\u00e9s.<br \/>\n       Par un courrier du 20 d\u00e9cembre 2023, le greffe a inform\u00e9 la partie requ\u00e9rante que la partie adverse s\u2019\u00e9tait abstenue de transmettre un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse dans le d\u00e9lai prescrit.<br \/>\n       M. Christian Amelynck, premier auditeur chef de section au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note, le 13 mars 2024, demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 14bis du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       Par des courriers du 14 mars 2024, le greffe a inform\u00e9 les parties que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins que l\u2019une d\u2019entre elles ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.<br \/>\n       Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.<br \/>\n       III. Absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis<br \/>\n       L\u2019article 21 des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose, en son alin\u00e9a 2, que \u00ab lorsque la partie requ\u00e9rante ne respecte pas les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus pour l\u2019envoi du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique ou du m\u00e9moire ampliatif, la section statue sans d\u00e9lai, les parties entendues \u00e0 leur demande, en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis \u00bb. La mention de l\u2019article 21, alin\u00e9a 2, pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite lors de l\u2019envoi \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante du courrier l\u2019informant de ce que la partie adverse s\u2019\u00e9tait abstenue de transmettre un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 14bis, \u00a7 2, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       La partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019ayant pas d\u00e9pos\u00e9 de m\u00e9moire ampliatif dans le d\u00e9lai imparti et aucune des parties n\u2019ayant demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue, il y a lieu de constater l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis.<br \/>\n       VI \u2013 22.634- 2\/4<br \/>\n       IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et autres d\u00e9pens<br \/>\n       Par une d\u00e9cision du 19 d\u00e9cembre 2023, la partie adverse a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 au retrait de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e du 14 juillet 2023 et a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 d\u2019attribuer \u00e0 nouveau le lot 1 du march\u00e9 litigieux \u00e0 la partie intervenante. Cette nouvelle d\u00e9cision d\u2019attribution a fait l\u2019objet de recours en suspension et en annulation introduits par la partie requ\u00e9rante et enr\u00f4l\u00e9 sous le num\u00e9ro A.240.910\/VI-22.723. La d\u00e9cision de retrait pr\u00e9cit\u00e9e n\u2019a, quant \u00e0 elle, pas fait l\u2019objet de recours. Par une d\u00e9cision du 7<br \/>\n       f\u00e9vrier 2024, la d\u00e9cision du 19 d\u00e9cembre 2023 a fait \u00e9galement l\u2019objet d\u2019un retrait, \u00ab sauf en ce qu\u2019elle proc\u00e8de elle-m\u00eame au retrait de la d\u00e9cision suspendue du 14<br \/>\n       juillet 2023 \u00bb. Dans ces circonstances, le retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 dans la pr\u00e9sente affaire peut \u00eatre tenu pour d\u00e9finitif de sorte que la partie requ\u00e9rante doit \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme la partie ayant obtenu gain de cause au sens de l\u2019article 30\/1 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019Etat.<br \/>\n       La partie requ\u00e9rante demande que la partie adverse soit \u00ab condamn\u00e9e aux entiers d\u00e9pens, en ce compris l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure liquid\u00e9e dans le chef de la requ\u00e9rante \u00e0 la somme de 924 euros \u00bb.<br \/>\n       Toutefois, s\u2019agissant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure, en application de l\u2019article 67, \u00a7 2, alin\u00e9a 3, de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 du R\u00e9gent du 23 ao\u00fbt 1948 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, aucune majoration n\u2019est due, l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9.<br \/>\n       Par cons\u00e9quent, il convient d\u2019accorder \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros et de mettre les autres d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse, \u00e0 l\u2019exception de ceux relatifs \u00e0 l\u2019intervention qui sont laiss\u00e9s \u00e0 la partie intervenante.<br \/>\n       PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :<br \/>\n       Article 1er.<br \/>\n       La requ\u00eate en annulation est rejet\u00e9e.<br \/>\n       VI \u2013 22.634- 3\/4<br \/>\n       Article 2.<br \/>\n       La partie intervenante supporte le droit de 150 euros li\u00e9 \u00e0 son intervention.<br \/>\n       La partie adverse supporte les autres d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir les droits de r\u00f4le de 400 euros, les contributions de 48 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.<br \/>\n       Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 13 septembre 2024, par la VIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :<br \/>\n       Florence Piret, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f., Vincent Durieux, greffier.<br \/>\n       Le Greffier, La Pr\u00e9sidente,<br \/>\n       Vincent Durieux Florence Piret<br \/>\n       VI \u2013 22.634- 4\/4<\/p>\n<p>Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613\n       <\/p>\n<p>            Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s)              <\/p>\n<p>pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 par:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.257.390         <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Action LOG \nfunction JUPORTARecordLogViewDecision  $iubel_id        : 278571\n                                       $action_type     : VIEW\n                                      &amp;$action_startmt  : 1780625541.0631\n                                      &amp;$action_duration : 170\n                                      &amp;$addressipremote : 103.115.10.116\n                                      &amp;$latitude        : '39.0469000'\n                                      &amp;$longitude       : '-77.4903000'\n                                      &amp;$accuracy        : null\n                                      &amp;$altitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$langue_view     : FR\n--><br \/>\n<!-- Action_duration 170 millisec --><br \/>\n      <!-- end of main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>    <!-- end of division \"page_main\" --><\/p>\n<p>              &#9993; info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n<p>              &copy;&nbsp; 2017-2026&nbsp;Service ICT &#8211; SPF Justice<\/p>\n<p>  <!-- end of division \"conteneur\" --><\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><\/p>\n<p>\n          Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n      <\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa Start --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa End --><\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/juportal.be\/content\/ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613\/FR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#8217;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#8217;onglet Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 No R\u00f4le: A. 239911\/VI-22634 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260613 &#8211; March\u00e9s publics &#8211; 13\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#8217;introduction: 2024-09-16 Consultations: 95 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:09 Fiches&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[149701],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[16586,7735,136535,17415,15537],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1137856","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-613","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-ayant","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#039;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#039;onglet Conseil d&#039;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 No R\u00f4le: A. 239911\/VI-22634 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260613 - March\u00e9s publics - 13\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#039;introduction: 2024-09-16 Consultations: 95 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:09 Fiches...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T07:42:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 No R\u00f4le: A. 239911\/VI-22634 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260613 - March\u00e9s publics - 13\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-16 Consultations: 95 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:09 Fiches...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-18T07:42:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-613\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.613"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1137856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1137856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1137856"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1137856"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1137856"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1137856"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1137856"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1137856"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1137856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}