{"id":1138066,"date":"2026-06-18T10:30:02","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T08:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T10:30:02","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T08:30:02","slug":"eclibervsce2024ord-15-998","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- continue here with main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>            <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p>        &nbsp;<br \/>\nConseil d&apos;\u00c9tat  <\/p>\n<p>            Ordonnance du 10 septembre 2024            <\/p>\n<p>No ECLI:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998<\/p>\n<p>No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n<p>A. 242631\/XI-24878<\/p>\n<p>Affaire:<\/p>\n<p>Ordonnance de cassation 15998 &#8211; Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers &#8211; 10\/09\/2024<\/p>\n<p>Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n<p>\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n<p>Date d&#8217;introduction:<\/p>\n<p>2024-09-11<\/p>\n<p>Consultations:<\/p>\n<p>89 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:08<\/p>\n<p>            Fiche            <\/p>\n<p> Ordonnance de cassation no 15.998 du 10 septembre 2024 Etrangers &#8211; Conseil<br \/>\n        du Contentieux des Etrangers D\u00e9cision :  Non admis\n    <\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n<p>CONSEIL D&apos;ETAT\n<\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n<p>DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF &#8211; CONSEIL D&apos;\u00c9TAT &#8211; Section administration\n <\/p>\n<p>            Texte de la d\u00e9cision            <\/p>\n<p>\n       CONSEIL D&#8217;\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF<br \/>\n       ORDONNANCE RENDUE EN PROC\u00c9DURE<br \/>\n       D\u2019ADMISSIBILIT\u00c9 DES RECOURS EN CASSATION<br \/>\n       no 15.998 du 10 septembre 2024<br \/>\n       A. 242.631\/XI-24.878<br \/>\n       En cause : XXXXX, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par XXXXX, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Sophie BUYSSE, avocat, provinciesteenweg 537\/1<br \/>\n       2530 Boechout, contre :<br \/>\n       l&#8217;\u00c9tat belge, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par la Secr\u00e9taire d\u2019\u00c9tat \u00e0 l\u2019Asile et la Migration.<br \/>\n       &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br \/>\n       Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 31 juillet 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite la cassation de l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 309.213 du 2 juillet 2024 rendu par le Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers dans l\u2019affaire 306.785\/VII.<br \/>\n       Le dossier de la proc\u00e9dure a \u00e9t\u00e9 communiqu\u00e9 le 27 ao\u00fbt 2024 par le Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers.<br \/>\n       Il est fait application de l\u2019article 20 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, ins\u00e9r\u00e9 par l&#8217;article 8 de la loi du 15 septembre 2006 \u2018r\u00e9formant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat et cr\u00e9ant un Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers\u2019, et de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 royal du 30 novembre 2006 \u2018d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure en cassation devant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat\u2019, notamment les articles 7 \u00e0 11.<br \/>\n       Il est \u00e9galement fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois \u2018sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat\u2019, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.<br \/>\n       Il ressort du dossier de la proc\u00e9dure que la partie requ\u00e9rante a obtenu le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l\u2019assistance judiciaire devant le Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers.<br \/>\n       Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 33\/1 de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 royal du 30 novembre 2006 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, elle en b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie \u00e9galement dans la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       XI &#8211; 24.878 &#8211; 1\/3<br \/>\n       Le moyen unique<br \/>\n       D\u00e9cision du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat<br \/>\n       Le Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat, statuant en cassation, n\u2019est pas un juge d\u2019appel. Il n\u2019est pas comp\u00e9tent pour substituer son appr\u00e9ciation des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause \u00e0 celle du Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers et pour d\u00e9cider \u00e0 sa place que le \u00ab mariage des parties a bien \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnu par l\u2019officier d\u2019\u00e9tat civil le 6.2.2023 \u00bb, qu\u2019il \u00ab existe donc bien un lien de beau-p\u00e8re \u00e0 beau-fils entre (\u2026) et (\u2026) \u00bb ainsi que l\u2019enfant mineur de la partie requ\u00e9rante remplit les conditions requises pour b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier d\u2019un regroupement familial.<br \/>\n       Les critiques, par lesquelles la partie requ\u00e9rante invoque la violation de l\u2019article 40ter de la loi du 15 d\u00e9cembre 1980 sur l&#8217;acc\u00e8s au territoire, le s\u00e9jour, l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement et l&#8217;\u00e9loignement des \u00e9trangers ainsi que celle de l\u2019article 8 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l\u2019homme et des libert\u00e9s fondamentales et par lesquelles elle invite le Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u00e0 substituer son appr\u00e9ciation \u00e0 celle du premier juge au sujet des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause pr\u00e9cit\u00e9s, sont manifestement irrecevables.<br \/>\n       L\u2019obligation de motivation, prescrite par l\u2019article 149 de la Constitution et par l\u2019article 39\/65 de la loi du 15 d\u00e9cembre 1980, ne concerne pas l\u2019exactitude ou le bien-fond\u00e9 des motifs. Le caract\u00e8re erron\u00e9 de certains motifs, invoqu\u00e9 par la partie requ\u00e9rante, ne peut emporter une violation des dispositions pr\u00e9cit\u00e9es. Sur ce point, le moyen unique n\u2019est manifestement pas fond\u00e9.<br \/>\n       Par ailleurs, l\u2019expos\u00e9 d\u2019un moyen de cassation, prescrit par l\u2019article 3, \u00a7 2, 9\u00b0, de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 royal 30 novembre 2006 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure en cassation devant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, requiert non seulement d\u2019indiquer quelles sont les normes qui auraient \u00e9t\u00e9 viol\u00e9es mais \u00e9galement d\u2019expliquer d\u2019une mani\u00e8re compr\u00e9hensible les raisons pour lesquelles elles l\u2019auraient \u00e9t\u00e9. Une explication compr\u00e9hensible suppose que le requ\u00e9rant expose l\u2019enti\u00e8ret\u00e9 de son raisonnement et pas seulement des parties de celui-ci en d\u00e9laissant \u00e0 la partie adverse et au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat la t\u00e2che de deviner la signification de ses critiques.<br \/>\n       La partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019explique pas de mani\u00e8re compr\u00e9hensible \u00e0 quelles critiques de sa requ\u00eate initiale, le Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers n\u2019aurait pas r\u00e9pondu. Sur ce point, le moyen unique est d\u00e8s lors manifestement irrecevable.<br \/>\n       Pour les motifs qui pr\u00e9c\u00e8dent, le moyen unique est en partie manifestement irrecevable et en partie manifestement non fond\u00e9.<br \/>\n       XI &#8211; 24.878 &#8211; 2\/3<br \/>\n       PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :<br \/>\n       Article 1er.<br \/>\n       Le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l\u2019assistance judiciaire est accord\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.<br \/>\n       Article 2.<br \/>\n       Le recours en cassation n\u2019est pas admissible.<br \/>\n       Article 3.<br \/>\n       Les d\u00e9pens, liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 la somme de 200 euros, sont \u00e0 charge de la partie requ\u00e9rante.<br \/>\n       Ainsi rendu \u00e0 Bruxelles, le 10 septembre 2024, par :<br \/>\n       Yves Houyet, pr\u00e9sident de chambre, Xavier Dupont, greffier.<br \/>\n       Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,<br \/>\n       Xavier Dupont Yves Houyet<br \/>\n       XI &#8211; 24.878 &#8211; 3\/3<\/p>\n<p>Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998\n       <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Action LOG \nfunction JUPORTARecordLogViewDecision  $iubel_id        : 278595\n                                       $action_type     : VIEW\n                                      &amp;$action_startmt  : 1780624673.1977\n                                      &amp;$action_duration : 67\n                                      &amp;$addressipremote : 103.115.10.116\n                                      &amp;$latitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$longitude       : null\n                                      &amp;$accuracy        : null\n                                      &amp;$altitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$langue_view     : FR\n--><br \/>\n<!-- Action_duration 67 millisec --><br \/>\n      <!-- end of main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>    <!-- end of division \"page_main\" --><\/p>\n<p>              &#9993; info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n<p>              &copy;&nbsp; 2017-2026&nbsp;Service ICT &#8211; SPF Justice<\/p>\n<p>  <!-- end of division \"conteneur\" --><\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><\/p>\n<p>\n          Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n      <\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa Start --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa End --><\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/juportal.be\/content\/ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998\/FR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#8217;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#8217;onglet Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat Ordonnance du 10 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 No R\u00f4le: A. 242631\/XI-24878 Affaire: Ordonnance de cassation 15998 &#8211; Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers &#8211; 10\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#8217;introduction: 2024-09-11 Consultations: 89 -&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[149743],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7735,8424,17415,129163,95093],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1138066","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024ord-15-998","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-contentieux","kji_keyword-etrangers","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#039;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#039;onglet Conseil d&#039;\u00c9tat Ordonnance du 10 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 No R\u00f4le: A. 242631\/XI-24878 Affaire: Ordonnance de cassation 15998 - Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers - 10\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#039;introduction: 2024-09-11 Consultations: 89 -...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T08:30:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Ordonnance du 10 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 No R\u00f4le: A. 242631\/XI-24878 Affaire: Ordonnance de cassation 15998 - Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers - 10\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-11 Consultations: 89 -...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-18T08:30:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-15-998\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.15.998"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1138066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1138066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1138066"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1138066"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1138066"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1138066"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1138066"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1138066"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1138066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}