{"id":1140030,"date":"2026-06-18T18:08:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T16:08:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T18:08:27","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T16:08:27","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-717","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 septembre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 234376\/XV-4835<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 260717 – Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes – 20\/09\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-09-25<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

96 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-05 02:32<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 260.717 du 20 septembre 2024 Am\u00e9nagement du territoire, urbanisme,
\n environnement et affaires connexes – Permis d'urbanisme et permis
\n mixtes D\u00e9cision : Rejet\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LA PR\u00c9SIDENTE DE LA XVe CHAMBRE
\n no 260.717 du 20 septembre 2024
\n A. 234.376\/XV-4835
\n En cause : P.P., ayant \u00e9lu domicile en Belgique
\n contre :
\n la commune de Molenbeek-Saint-Jean, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son coll\u00e8ge des bourgmestre et \u00e9chevins, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Sacha GRUBER, avocat, avenue Louise, 140\/4
\n 1050 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite, par la voie \u00e9lectronique, le 11 ao\u00fbt 2021, le requ\u00e9rant demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision de la commission de concertation de la commune de Molenbeek-Saint-Jean du 22 juin 2021 ayant pour r\u00e9f\u00e9rence PU
\n 37834 \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Le dossier administratif a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9.
\n Les m\u00e9moires en r\u00e9ponse et en r\u00e9plique ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement \u00e9chang\u00e9s.
\n M. Yves Delval, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 un rapport sur la base de l\u2019article 93 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Par une ordonnance du 8 juillet 2024, les parties ont \u00e9t\u00e9 convoqu\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 17 septembre 2024 et le rapport leur a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9.
\n XV – 4835 – 1\/4
\n Mme \u00c9lisabeth Willemart, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Attiya Lon, loco Me Sacha Gruber, avocate, comparaissant pour la partie adverse, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en ses observations.
\n M. Yves Delval, premier auditeur, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu en son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Faits
\n 1. L\u2019association sans but lucratif Sint-Goedele Brussel a introduit une demande de permis d\u2019urbanisme visant, sur le site de l\u2019\u00e9cole Sint-Martinus 77-79
\n rue Paloke \u00e0 Molenbeek-Saint-Jean, \u00e0 d\u00e9molir le presbyt\u00e8re, \u00e0 agrandir l\u2019\u00e9cole n\u00e9erlandophone, \u00e0 abattre et \u00e0 replanter 26 arbres et \u00e0 r\u00e9am\u00e9nager la cour de r\u00e9cr\u00e9ation.
\n 2. Le 22 juin 2021, la commission de concertation \u00e9met un avis favorable sur la demande et accorde une d\u00e9rogation \u00e0 l\u2019article du Titre Ier du r\u00e8glement r\u00e9gional d\u2019urbanisme (RRU). Il s\u2019agit de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9.
\n 3. Le 4 avril 2022, le permis d\u2019urbanisme est d\u00e9livr\u00e9.
\n 4. Le 30 juin 2022, le requ\u00e9rant introduit un recours en annulation \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de ce permis. Le recours est rejet\u00e9 par l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 255.696 du 6 f\u00e9vrier 2023
\n (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.696), car il n\u2019a pas d\u00e9pos\u00e9 de m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique dans le d\u00e9lai imparti.
\n IV. D\u00e9bats succincts
\n L\u2019auditeur rapporteur a examin\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent recours dans le cadre de la proc\u00e9dure en d\u00e9bats succincts, \u00e9tant d\u2019avis que le recours \u00e9tait manifestement irrecevable.
\n XV – 4835 – 2\/4
\n L\u2019extrait pertinent du rapport se lit comme il suit (les notes infrapaginales sont omises) :
\n \u00ab L\u2019objet du recours est l\u2019avis favorable unanime de la commission de concertation qui accorde une d\u00e9rogation au Titre I, article 8 du r\u00e8glement r\u00e9gional d\u2019urbanisme.
\n Comme le rel\u00e8ve l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 241.256 du 18 avril 2018, compte tenu de [la]
\n similitude avec la comp\u00e9tence de d\u00e9rogation accord\u00e9e au fonctionnaire d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9, la d\u00e9cision unanime de la commission de concertation doit s\u2019analyser en une d\u00e9cision sur les d\u00e9rogations et elle est d\u00e8s lors un acte susceptible de recours.
\n Le requ\u00e9rant ne conserve toutefois son int\u00e9r\u00eat au recours introduit \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de cet acte interlocutoire que pour autant qu\u2019il introduise \u00e9galement et r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement un recours contre l\u2019acte final de la proc\u00e9dure. Or, le recours contre l\u2019acte final a \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9 par l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 255.696 du 6 f\u00e9vrier 2023, car le requ\u00e9rant n\u2019a pas d\u00e9pos\u00e9 de m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique dans le d\u00e9lai imparti. Il n\u2019a ainsi \u00e0 tout le moins plus int\u00e9r\u00eat au recours \u00bb.
\n Par un courrier du 29 juillet 2024, le requ\u00e9rant a indiqu\u00e9 qu\u2019il a \u00ab bien pris connaissance de l\u2019avis de l\u2019auditorat \u00bb et qu\u2019il \u00ab acquiesce \u00e0 celui-ci \u00bb. Il a par ailleurs indiqu\u00e9 que \u00ab le recours est d\u00e9sormais \u00e9galement sans objet car le b\u00e2timent a \u00e9t\u00e9 ras\u00e9 pour faire place aux travaux de construction \u00bb.
\n Il s\u2019ensuit que le recours est irrecevable.
\n Les conclusions du rapport peuvent ainsi \u00eatre suivies.
\n V. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure
\n Dans son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse, la partie adverse sollicite une \u00ab indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure \u00bb, \u00e0 la charge du requ\u00e9rant. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande et de lui accorder une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure au montant de base.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La requ\u00eate est rejet\u00e9e.
\n Article 2.
\n Le requ\u00e9rant supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 20 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.
\n XV – 4835 – 3\/4
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9, \u00e0 Bruxelles, le 20 septembre 2024, par la XVe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n \u00c9lisabeth Willemart, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f., Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Quintin, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, La Pr\u00e9sidente,
\n Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Quintin \u00c9lisabeth Willemart
\n XV – 4835 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717\n <\/p>\n

Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s) <\/p>\n

citant:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.696 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 No R\u00f4le: A. 234376\/XV-4835 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260717 – Permis d’urbanisme et permis mixtes – 20\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-09-25 Consultations: 96 – derni\u00e8re vue…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[149933],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[17415,95855,23480,15545,53488],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1140030","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-717","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-permis","kji_keyword-recours","kji_keyword-requerant","kji_keyword-urbanisme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 No R\u00f4le: A. 234376\/XV-4835 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260717 - Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes - 20\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-25 Consultations: 96 - derni\u00e8re vue...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T16:08:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 No R\u00f4le: A. 234376\/XV-4835 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260717 - Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes - 20\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-09-25 Consultations: 96 - derni\u00e8re vue...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-18T16:08:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-717\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.717"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1140030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1140030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1140030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1140030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1140030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1140030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1140030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1140030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1140030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}