{"id":1145078,"date":"2026-06-19T09:46:01","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T07:46:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/"},"modified":"2026-06-19T09:46:01","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T07:46:01","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-781","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 240942\/XI-24681<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 260781 – Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) – 25\/09\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-10-16<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

86 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:10<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 260.781 du 25 septembre 2024 Enseignement et culture – Contentieux
\n scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d'inscription) D\u00e9cision : D\u00e9sistement
\n d'instance\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XIe CHAMBRE
\n no 260.781 du 25 septembre 2024
\n A. 240.942\/XI-24.681
\n En cause : N.N., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Jean-Marc VAN GYSEGHEM, avocat boulevard de Waterloo 34
\n 1000 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la Communaut\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son Gouvernement, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Marc UYTTENDAELE, Anne FEYT et Ethel DESPY, avocats, rue de la Source 68
\n 1060 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 12 janvier 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande d\u2019une part, la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision de la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration Wallonie-Bruxelles du 17 juillet 2023 par laquelle le stage d\u2019adaptation en vue de la reconnaissance professionnelle en tant que dentiste g\u00e9n\u00e9raliste du requ\u00e9rant [\u2026] a \u00e9t\u00e9 interrompu \u00bb et d\u2019autre part, l\u2019annulation de cette d\u00e9cision.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n L\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 259.520 du 17 avril 2024
\n (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.259.520) a rejet\u00e9 la demande de suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9.
\n L\u2019arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties le 18 avril 2024.
\n XI – 24.681 –
\n 1\/3
\n Par un courrier dat\u00e9 du 18 avril 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante a \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9e \u00e0 introduire une demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure. Elle en a pris connaissance le 20 avril 2024.
\n M. Alain Lefebvre, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note le 10 juin 2024 demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 11\/3 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Par une lettre dat\u00e9e du 11 juin 2024, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante que la chambre allait statuer en d\u00e9cr\u00e9tant le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande, dans un d\u00e9lai de quinze jours, \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue. La partie requ\u00e9rante en a pris connaissance le 12 juin 2024.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. D\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance
\n L\u2019article 17, \u00a7 7, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose qu\u2019il existe dans le chef de la partie requ\u00e9rante une pr\u00e9somption de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance lorsque, la demande de suspension d\u2019un acte ou d\u2019un r\u00e8glement ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e, elle n\u2019introduit aucune demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans un d\u00e9lai de trente jours \u00e0 compter de la notification de l\u2019arr\u00eat.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019ayant pas introduit de demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans le d\u00e9lai imparti et n\u2019ayant pas non plus demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue, elle est donc pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e l\u00e9galement se d\u00e9sister de son recours.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n La partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure \u00ab liquid\u00e9e \u00e0 924
\n euros (indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de base) \u00bb. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande en la limitant au montant de base index\u00e9 de 770 euros d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019en vertu de l\u2019article 67, \u00a7 2, alin\u00e9a 3, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure, aucune majoration n\u2019est due dans l\u2019hypoth\u00e8se o\u00f9 notamment, comme en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il y a lieu de faire application de l\u2019article 11\/3 du m\u00eame r\u00e8glement.
\n XI – 24.681 –
\n 2\/3
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance est d\u00e9cr\u00e9t\u00e9.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 25 septembre 2024, par la XIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Emmanuel Jacubowitz, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Katty Lauvau, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Katty Lauvau Emmanuel Jacubowitz
\n XI – 24.681 –
\n 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781\n <\/p>\n

Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s) <\/p>\n

pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 par:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.259.520 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 No R\u00f4le: A. 240942\/XI-24681 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260781 – Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) – 25\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-10-16 Consultations: 86 – derni\u00e8re vue…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[150833],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[8683,7735,17415,16160,15537],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1145078","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-781","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-demande","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 No R\u00f4le: A. 240942\/XI-24681 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260781 - Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) - 25\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-10-16 Consultations: 86 - derni\u00e8re vue...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-19T07:46:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 No R\u00f4le: A. 240942\/XI-24681 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260781 - Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) - 25\/09\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-10-16 Consultations: 86 - derni\u00e8re vue...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-19T07:46:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-781\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.781"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1145078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1145078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1145078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1145078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1145078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1145078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1145078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1145078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1145078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}