{"id":1163430,"date":"2026-06-21T18:59:55","date_gmt":"2026-06-21T16:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/"},"modified":"2026-06-21T18:59:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-21T16:59:55","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-261-184","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 23 octobre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 241023\/XI-24696<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 261184 – Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) – 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-10-28<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

76 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 16:55<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 261.184 du 23 octobre 2024 Enseignement et culture – Contentieux
\n scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d'inscription) D\u00e9cision : Rejet\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XIe CHAMBRE
\n no 261.184 du 23 octobre 2024
\n A. 241.023\/XI-24.696
\n En cause : P.K., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Dieudonn\u00e9 ILUNGA KABINGA, avocat, avenue de la Toison d\u2019Or 67\/9
\n 1060 Bruxelles,
\n contre :
\n 1. la Commission d\u2019examen des plaintes d\u2019\u00e9tudiants relatives \u00e0 un refus d\u2019inscription \u2013 CEPERI, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Michel KAROLINSKI, avocat, galerie du Roi 30
\n 1000 Bruxelles, 2. l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Mons-Hainaut.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 25 janvier 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision du 18 d\u00e9cembre 2023 prise par la Commission de l’ARES-Secr\u00e9taire de la CEPERI charg\u00e9e de recevoir les dossiers de refus d’inscription en tra\u00eenant celle d’octobre 2023 de la part de la Commission de recours concernant les refus d’inscription, Direction des affaires acad\u00e9miques de l’Universit\u00e9 de Mons \u201cUMONS\u201d en d\u00e9faveur de mon client Monsieur P.K. : Place du Parc, 20 \u00e0 7000 Mons\u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n La premi\u00e8re partie adverse a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le dossier administratif.
\n XI – 24.696 – 1\/4
\n Un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 par la premi\u00e8re partie adverse et il a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante par courrier du 26 mars 2024, r\u00e9ceptionn\u00e9 le 29
\n mars 2024.
\n Une lettre valant m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9e par la seconde partie adverse et elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante par courrier du 19 avril 2024, r\u00e9ceptionn\u00e9 le 7 mai 2024.
\n M. Laurent Jans, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note le 19 juillet 2024 demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 14bis du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Par une lettre du 26 juillet 2024, r\u00e9ceptionn\u00e9e le 29 juillet 2024, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Par un courrier \u00e9lectronique du 24 juillet 2024, dont elle a pris connaissance le jour-m\u00eame, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re partie adverse que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Par une lettre du 26 juillet 2024, r\u00e9ceptionn\u00e9e le 29 juillet 2024, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la seconde partie adverse que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Par une ordonnance du 17 septembre 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 8 octobre 2024.
\n M. Emmanuel Jacubowitz, pr\u00e9sident de chambre f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Corneille Kweson Kieleka, loco Me Dieudonn\u00e9 Ilunga Kabinga, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie requ\u00e9rante, et Me Fran\u00e7ois Lorand, loco Me Michel Karolinski, avocat, comparaissant pour la premi\u00e8re partie adverse, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendus en leurs observations.
\n Mme Val\u00e9rie Michiels, premier auditeur, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en son avis conforme.
\n XI – 24.696 – 2\/4
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis
\n L\u2019article 21 des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose, en son alin\u00e9a 2, que \u00ab lorsque la partie requ\u00e9rante ne respecte pas les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus pour l\u2019envoi du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique ou du m\u00e9moire ampliatif, la section statue sans d\u00e9lai, les parties entendues \u00e0 leur demande, en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis \u00bb. La mention de l\u2019article 21, alin\u00e9a 2, pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite lors de l\u2019envoi \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante d\u2019une copie du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse de la premi\u00e8re partie adverse et d\u2019une copie de la lettre valant m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse de la seconde partie adverse, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 14bis, \u00a7 2, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019a pas d\u00e9pos\u00e9 de m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique dans le d\u00e9lai imparti. Elle a toutefois demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue. \u00c0 l\u2019audience du 8 octobre 2024, elle n\u2019a fait valoir aucune force majeure l\u2019ayant emp\u00each\u00e9e de d\u00e9poser un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique dans les d\u00e9lais. En cons\u00e9quence, il y a lieu de constater l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n La premi\u00e8re partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La requ\u00eate est rejet\u00e9e.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re partie adverse.
\n XI – 24.696 – 3\/4
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 23 octobre 2024, par la XIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Emmanuel Jacubowitz, pr\u00e9sident de chambre f.f., Xavier Dupont, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Xavier Dupont Emmanuel Jacubowitz
\n XI – 24.696 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 23 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 No R\u00f4le: A. 241023\/XI-24696 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261184 – Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) – 23\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-10-28 Consultations: 76 – derni\u00e8re vue…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[153160],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[16586,17415,99215,8598,15537],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1163430","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-261-184","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-memoire","kji_keyword-octobre","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 23 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 No R\u00f4le: A. 241023\/XI-24696 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261184 - Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) - 23\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-10-28 Consultations: 76 - derni\u00e8re vue...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-21T16:59:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 23 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 No R\u00f4le: A. 241023\/XI-24696 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261184 - Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) - 23\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-10-28 Consultations: 76 - derni\u00e8re vue...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-21T16:59:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-184\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.184"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1163430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1163430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1163430"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1163430"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1163430"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1163430"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1163430"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1163430"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1163430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}