{"id":1163475,"date":"2026-06-21T19:07:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-21T17:07:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/"},"modified":"2026-06-21T19:07:25","modified_gmt":"2026-06-21T17:07:25","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-261-195","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 24 octobre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 242131\/XI-24820<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 261195 – Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) – 24\/10\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-10-28<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

87 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-04 05:04<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 261.195 du 24 octobre 2024 Enseignement et culture – Contentieux
\n scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d'inscription) D\u00e9cision : Non lieu \u00e0 statuer
\n Lev\u00e9e\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XIe CHAMBRE SI\u00c9GEANT EN R\u00c9F\u00c9R\u00c9
\n no 261.195 du 24 octobre 2024
\n A. 242.131\/XI-24.820
\n En cause : M.T., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Thomas DELATTRE, avocat, chauss\u00e9e de Waterloo 868\/4
\n 1180 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la commune de Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, assist\u00e9e et repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par Me Geoffroy GENERET, avocat.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 12 juin 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande la suspension, selon la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019extr\u00eame urgence, de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision du 30 mai 2024, notifi\u00e9e le 12 juin 2024 \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure devant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat
\n Un arr\u00eat n\u00b0 260.129 du 14 juin 2024 a ordonn\u00e9 la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision du 30 mai 2024 n\u2019autorisant pas la partie requ\u00e9rante \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter ses examens de fin d\u2019ann\u00e9e et a r\u00e9serv\u00e9 \u00e0 statuer sur les d\u00e9pens (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.129).
\n Par une ordonnance du 19 septembre 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 21 octobre 2024.
\n M. Denis Delvax, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Megi Bakiasi, loco Me Thomas Delattre, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie requ\u00e9rante, et Me Juliette Byl, loco Me Geoffroy Generet, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie adverse, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendues en leurs observations.
\n M. Alain Lefebvre, premier auditeur, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu en son avis conforme.
\n XIr – 24.820 – 1\/3
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Lev\u00e9e de suspension
\n Aux termes de l\u2019article 17, \u00a7 4, alin\u00e9a 3, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat du 12 janvier 1973, \u00ab la suspension et les mesures provisoires qui auraient \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9es avant l\u2019introduction de la requ\u00eate en annulation de l\u2019acte ou du r\u00e8glement seront imm\u00e9diatement lev\u00e9es s\u2019il appara\u00eet qu\u2019aucune requ\u00eate en annulation invoquant les moyens qui les avaient justifi\u00e9es n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite dans le d\u00e9lai pr\u00e9vu par le r\u00e8glement de proc\u00e9dure \u00bb. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, aucune requ\u00eate en annulation n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite. L\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 n\u2019est plus susceptible d\u2019\u00eatre annul\u00e9.
\n Partant, la suspension ordonn\u00e9e par l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 260.129 du 14 juin 2024 devrait \u00eatre lev\u00e9e.
\n Il ressort toutefois d\u2019un courrier adress\u00e9 au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat le 24 juin 2024 par la partie requ\u00e9rante et des annexes \u00e0 ce dernier, que la partie requ\u00e9rante a \u00e9t\u00e9 autoris\u00e9e \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter ses examens de fin d\u2019ann\u00e9e. Cette circonstance prive le recours de tout objet.
\n Par ailleurs, en raison de la disparition de l\u2019acte dont la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e, il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer sur la lev\u00e9e de suspension ordonn\u00e9e par l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 260.129 du 14 juin 2024.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n Ayant obtenu gain de cause, il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande. Les autres d\u00e9pens sont \u00e9galement support\u00e9s par la partie adverse.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer sur la lev\u00e9e de suspension ordonn\u00e9e par l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 260.129 du 14 juin 2024.
\n XIr – 24.820 – 2\/3
\n Article 2.
\n La partie adverse supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 24 octobre 2024, par la XIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat si\u00e9geant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Denis Delvax, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Katty Lauvau, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Katty Lauvau Denis Delvax
\n XIr – 24.820 – 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195\n <\/p>\n

Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s) <\/p>\n

pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 par:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.129 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 24 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 No R\u00f4le: A. 242131\/XI-24820 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261195 – Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) – 24\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-10-28 Consultations: 87 – derni\u00e8re vue…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[153177],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[8683,17415,15537,120926,9045],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1163475","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-261-195","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_keyword-rvsce","kji_keyword-suspension","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 24 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 No R\u00f4le: A. 242131\/XI-24820 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261195 - Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) - 24\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-10-28 Consultations: 87 - derni\u00e8re vue...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-21T17:07:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 24 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 No R\u00f4le: A. 242131\/XI-24820 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261195 - Contentieux scolaire (\u00e9chec, refus d\u2019inscription) - 24\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-10-28 Consultations: 87 - derni\u00e8re vue...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-21T17:07:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-195\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.195"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1163475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1163475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1163475"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1163475"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1163475"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1163475"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1163475"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1163475"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1163475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}