{"id":1163728,"date":"2026-06-21T19:56:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-21T17:56:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/"},"modified":"2026-06-21T19:56:27","modified_gmt":"2026-06-21T17:56:27","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-261-255","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 31 octobre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 241799\/VI-22811<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 261255 – March\u00e9s publics – 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-11-08<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

97 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 09:13<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 261.255 du 31 octobre 2024 March\u00e9s et travaux publics – March\u00e9s
\n publics D\u00e9cision : Lev\u00e9e\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019ETAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA VIe CHAMBRE SI\u00c9GEANT EN R\u00c9F\u00c9R\u00c9
\n ARRET
\n no 261.255 du 31 octobre 2024
\n A. 241.799\/VI-22.811
\n En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e DEVILLERS, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Jean-Fran\u00e7ois JAMINET, avocat, rue Plumier 10\/2A
\n 4000 Li\u00e8ge, contre :
\n 1. la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme RESA
\n INNOVATION ET TECHNOLOGIE, 2. la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme RESA, ayant toutes deux \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Patrick THIEL, Isabelle VAN KRUCHTEN
\n et Hugo de GENNES, avocats, chauss\u00e9e de La Hulpe 185
\n 1170 Bruxelles.
\n Partie intervenante :
\n la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e JARDIPARC, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me David RENDERS, avocat, rue du Concours 1
\n 1170 Bruxelles, et \u00e9tant \u00e9galement assist\u00e9e et repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par Mes Emmanuelle GONTHIER et Caroline DELFORGE, avocats.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 29 avril 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite la suspension, selon la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019extr\u00eame urgence, de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision de RESA Innovation et Technologie (agissant en son nom et pour compte de RESA) du 3
\n avril 2024, notifi\u00e9e par courrier recommand\u00e9 dat\u00e9 du 3 avril 2024 et par courrier \u00e9lectronique du 12 avril 2024, par laquelle celle-ci a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 d\u2019arr\u00eater la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019attribution du march\u00e9 \u201cEntretien des espaces verts aux abords des postes 70\/15 kv, cabines r\u00e9seau (gaz et \u00e9lectricit\u00e9)\u201d \u2013 4 lots (lot 1 zone 1 ; lot 2 zone 2 ; lot 3 zone 3 ; lot 4 zone 4) en vertu des articles 85 et 153 de la loi du 17 juin 2016 et de charger ses
\n VIr – 22.811 – 1\/4
\n services de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 la r\u00e9daction de nouveaux documents de march\u00e9 en vue d\u2019une relance ult\u00e9rieure du march\u00e9 \u2013 4 lots \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Un arr\u00eat no 260.073 du 10 juin 2024 a accueilli la requ\u00eate en intervention introduite par la SRL Jardiparc et a ordonn\u00e9 la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.
\n Cet arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties.
\n Par une ordonnance du 24 septembre 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 10 octobre 2024 \u00e0 13 heures 30.
\n M. David De Roy, pr\u00e9sident de chambre, a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Guillaume Poulain, loco Me Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Jaminet, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie requ\u00e9rante, Me Lalie Lequeux, loco Mes Patrick Thiel, Isabelle Van Kruchten et Hugo De Gennes, avocate, comparaissant pour les parties adverses, et Me Emmanuelle Gonthier, avocate, comparaissant pour la partie intervenante, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendus en leurs observations.
\n M. Christian Amelynck, premier auditeur chef de section au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu en son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Lev\u00e9e de suspension
\n Aux termes de l\u2019article 17, \u00a7 4, alin\u00e9a 3, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, la \u00ab suspension et les mesures provisoires qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9es avant l\u2019introduction de la requ\u00eate en annulation de l\u2019acte ou du r\u00e8glement seront imm\u00e9diatement lev\u00e9es s\u2019il appara\u00eet qu\u2019aucune requ\u00eate en annulation invoquant des moyens qui les avaient justifi\u00e9es n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite dans le d\u00e9lai pr\u00e9vu par le r\u00e8glement de proc\u00e9dure \u00bb.
\n En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, aucune requ\u00eate en annulation n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite et l\u2019acte dont la suspension a \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e n\u2019est plus susceptible d\u2019\u00eatre annul\u00e9. La suspension ordonn\u00e9e par l\u2019arr\u00eat no 260.073 du 10 juin 2024 doit \u00eatre lev\u00e9e.
\n VIr – 22.811 – 2\/4
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et autres d\u00e9pens
\n Post\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 la suspension ordonn\u00e9e par l\u2019arr\u00eat no 260.073 du 10 juin 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019a pas introduit de requ\u00eate en annulation dans le d\u00e9lai pr\u00e9vu pour ce faire. Interrog\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019audience sur la question de savoir si la d\u00e9cision suspendue avait fait l\u2019objet d\u2019un \u00e9ventuel retrait, les parties requ\u00e9rante et adverses n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 en mesure de le pr\u00e9ciser. La partie intervenante a, quant \u00e0 elle, d\u00e9clar\u00e9 qu\u2019elle ne s\u2019\u00e9tait pas vu notifier une telle d\u00e9cision de retrait.
\n Dans ces conditions o\u00f9 il n\u2019est pas \u00e9tabli que la d\u00e9cision qui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 suspendue a finalement \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9e, il y a lieu de consid\u00e9rer les parties adverses comme celles ayant obtenu gain de cause dans ce litige.
\n Les parties adverses sollicitent une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 leur demande.
\n Par ailleurs, les autres d\u00e9pens sont laiss\u00e9s \u00e0 la charge de la partie requ\u00e9rante, \u00e0 l\u2019exception de ceux relatifs \u00e0 l\u2019intervention qui sont mis \u00e0 la charge de la partie intervenante
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La suspension ordonn\u00e9e par l\u2019arr\u00eat no 260.073 du 10 juin 2024 est lev\u00e9e.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie intervenante supporte le droit de 150 euros li\u00e9 \u00e0 son intervention.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les autres d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e aux parties adverses.
\n VIr – 22.811 – 3\/4
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 31 octobre 2024, par la VIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat si\u00e9geant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, compos\u00e9e de :
\n David De Roy, pr\u00e9sident de chambre, Vincent Durieux, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Vincent Durieux David De Roy
\n VIr – 22.811 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255\n <\/p>\n

Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s) <\/p>\n

pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 par:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.073 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 31 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 No R\u00f4le: A. 241799\/VI-22811 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261255 – March\u00e9s publics – 31\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-11-08 Consultations: 97 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 09:13 Fiche…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[153261],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[8683,17415,15537,26430,9045],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1163728","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-261-255","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_keyword-requete","kji_keyword-suspension","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 31 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 No R\u00f4le: A. 241799\/VI-22811 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261255 - March\u00e9s publics - 31\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-11-08 Consultations: 97 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 09:13 Fiche...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-21T17:56:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 31 octobre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 No R\u00f4le: A. 241799\/VI-22811 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261255 - March\u00e9s publics - 31\/10\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-11-08 Consultations: 97 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 09:13 Fiche...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-21T17:56:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-255\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.255"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1163728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1163728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1163728"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1163728"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1163728"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1163728"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1163728"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1163728"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1163728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}