{"id":1170318,"date":"2026-06-22T12:53:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T10:53:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/"},"modified":"2026-06-22T12:53:44","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T10:53:44","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-261-531","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 27 novembre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 239672\/XV-5533<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 261531 – Sanctions \u00e9conomiques dont le gel des avoirs – 27\/11\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-11-27<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

111 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 16:18<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 261.531 du 27 novembre 2024 Economie – Sanctions \u00e9conomiques
\n dont le gel des avoirs D\u00e9cision : Non lieu \u00e0 statuer\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LA PR\u00c9SIDENTE DE LA XVe CHAMBRE
\n no 261.531 du 27 novembre 2024
\n A. 239.672\/XV-5533
\n En cause : M.V., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Laurens ENGELEN
\n et Aurore ANCION, avocats, rue de la R\u00e9gence, 58
\n 1000 Bruxelles, contre :
\n l\u2019\u00c9tat belge, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le ministre des Finances.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite, par la voie \u00e9lectronique, le 26 juillet 2023, le requ\u00e9rant demande l\u2019annulation \u00ab de la d\u00e9cision de refus (r\u00e9f\u00e9rence PID : 18391, TID : 89597) prise le 7 juin 2023 et notifi\u00e9e (de mani\u00e8re \u00e9lectronique) le 13 juin 2023, par l\u2019\u00c9tat belge, SPF Finances, Administration g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la Tr\u00e9sorerie, de lib\u00e9rer les titres et les fonds [lui] appartenant et d\u00e9tenus pour [lui] par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par actions Raiffeisenbank, par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire de la cha\u00eene de d\u00e9positaires, y compris National Settlement Depository et Euroclear Bank, sur base de l\u2019article 6ter, \u00a7 5 du r\u00e8glement (UE) n\u00b0 269\/2014 du Conseil du 17 mars 2014 concernant des mesures restrictives eu \u00e9gard aux actions compromettant ou mena\u00e7ant l\u2019int\u00e9grit\u00e9 territoriale, la souverainet\u00e9 et l\u2019ind\u00e9pendance de l\u2019Ukraine \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n La partie adverse a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 un dossier administratif et un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse.
\n Le requ\u00e9rant ayant son domicile \u00e0 Moscou (F\u00e9d\u00e9ration de Russie), le d\u00e9lai de 60 jours dont il disposait pour d\u00e9poser son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique a \u00e9t\u00e9 prolong\u00e9 de 30 jours et port\u00e9 \u00e0 90 jours, en vertu de l\u2019article 89 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n XV – 5533 – 1\/4
\n Le requ\u00e9rant a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique.
\n Par un courrier d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 15 mars 2024 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat et dont le requ\u00e9rant a pris connaissance le 18 mars, la partie adverse a inform\u00e9 le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat du retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9.
\n Mme Esther Rombaux, auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de faire application de l\u2019article 11\/5 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Par une ordonnance du 26 septembre 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 19 novembre 2024.
\n Mme \u00c9lisabeth Willemart, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Aurore Ancion, avocate, comparaissant pour le requ\u00e9rant, et Mme Fabienne Roland, conseiller g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, comparaissant pour la partie adverse, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendues en leurs observations.
\n Mme Esther Rombaux, auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Perte d\u2019objet
\n Par une d\u00e9cision du 13 mars 2024, la partie adverse a retir\u00e9 l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9. Cette d\u00e9cision a \u00e9t\u00e9 communiqu\u00e9e par un courrier \u00e9lectronique du lendemain au premier conseil du requ\u00e9rant.
\n La d\u00e9cision de retrait n\u2019a pas fait l\u2019objet d\u2019un recours, de sorte qu\u2019elle peut \u00eatre tenue pour d\u00e9finitive.
\n Le retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 prive le recours de son objet et il n\u2019y a, en cons\u00e9quence, plus lieu de statuer sur le recours en annulation.
\n XV – 5533 – 2\/4
\n IV. Confidentialit\u00e9
\n Dans sa requ\u00eate, le requ\u00e9rant demande, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 87, \u00a7\u00a7 2 \u00e0 4 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure, la confidentialit\u00e9 des pi\u00e8ces nos A1 et A2 jointes \u00e0 sa requ\u00eate au motif qu\u2019il \u00ab s\u2019agit d\u2019une d\u00e9cision individuelle adopt\u00e9e par la partie adverse \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de tierce personne \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure et\/ou d\u2019une demande adress\u00e9e par tierce personne \u00e0 la partie adverse, et qui contient des \u00e9l\u00e9ments personnels \u00bb.
\n D\u00e8s lors que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat met fin \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure devant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer sur la demande de confidentialit\u00e9.
\n V. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n Dans son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique le requ\u00e9rant sollicite que lui soit accord\u00e9e une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse.
\n La disparition de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9, cons\u00e9quence de son retrait, constitue une forme de succ\u00e9dan\u00e9 d\u2019une annulation contentieuse de sorte que le requ\u00e9rant peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme ayant obtenu gain de cause, au sens de l\u2019article 30\/1 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat. Il y a, en cons\u00e9quence, lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.
\n Le retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 justifie \u00e9galement que les autres d\u00e9pens soient mis \u00e0 charge de la partie adverse.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer.
\n Article 2.
\n XV – 5533 – 3\/4
\n La partie adverse supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, accord\u00e9e au requ\u00e9rant.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9, \u00e0 Bruxelles, le 27 novembre 2024, par la XVe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n \u00c9lisabeth Willemart, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f.
\n Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Quintin, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, La Pr\u00e9sidente,
\n Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Quintin \u00c9lisabeth Willemart
\n XV – 5533 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 27 novembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 No R\u00f4le: A. 239672\/XV-5533 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261531 – Sanctions \u00e9conomiques dont le gel des avoirs – 27\/11\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-11-27 Consultations: 111 -…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[154430],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[16586,7735,17415,8576,15545],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1170318","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-261-531","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-novembre","kji_keyword-requerant","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 27 novembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 No R\u00f4le: A. 239672\/XV-5533 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261531 - Sanctions \u00e9conomiques dont le gel des avoirs - 27\/11\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-11-27 Consultations: 111 -...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-22T10:53:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 27 novembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 No R\u00f4le: A. 239672\/XV-5533 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261531 - Sanctions \u00e9conomiques dont le gel des avoirs - 27\/11\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-11-27 Consultations: 111 -...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-22T10:53:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-531\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.531"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1170318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1170318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1170318"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1170318"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1170318"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1170318"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1170318"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1170318"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1170318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}