{"id":1170679,"date":"2026-06-22T14:11:02","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T12:11:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/"},"modified":"2026-06-22T14:11:02","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T12:11:02","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-261-600","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- continue here with main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>            <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p>        &nbsp;<br \/>\nConseil d&apos;\u00c9tat  <\/p>\n<p>            Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 29 novembre 2024            <\/p>\n<p>No ECLI:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600<\/p>\n<p>No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n<p>A. 236649\/XV-5972<\/p>\n<p>Affaire:<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat 261600 &#8211; Logement &#8211; 29\/11\/2024<\/p>\n<p>Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n<p>\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n<p>Date d&#8217;introduction:<\/p>\n<p>2024-12-13<\/p>\n<p>Consultations:<\/p>\n<p>100 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-02 19:25<\/p>\n<p>            Fiche            <\/p>\n<p> Arr\u00eat no 261.600 du 29 novembre 2024 Am\u00e9nagement du territoire, urbanisme,<br \/>\n        environnement et affaires connexes &#8211; Logement D\u00e9cision :  D\u00e9sistement<br \/>\n        d&apos;instance\n    <\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n<p>CONSEIL D&apos;ETAT\n<\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n<p>DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF &#8211; CONSEIL D&apos;\u00c9TAT &#8211; Arr\u00eats (Conseil d&apos;\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n<p>            Texte de la d\u00e9cision            <\/p>\n<p>\n       CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF<br \/>\n       LA PR\u00c9SIDENTE DE LA XVe CHAMBRE<br \/>\n       no 261.600 du 29 novembre 2024<br \/>\n       A. 236.649\/XV-5972<br \/>\n       En cause : E.R., ayant \u00e9lu domicile au cabinet de son ancien conseil, place du Champ de Mars, 5, bo\u00eete 5<br \/>\n       1050 Bruxelles, contre :<br \/>\n       la R\u00e9gion de Bruxelles-Capitale, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son Gouvernement, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Marie BOURGYS, avocate, chemin de la Maison du Roi, 34C<br \/>\n       1380 Lasne.<br \/>\n       &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br \/>\n       I. Objet de la requ\u00eate<br \/>\n       Par une requ\u00eate introduite, par la voie \u00e9lectronique, le 20 juin 2022, le requ\u00e9rant demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision du Fonctionnaire d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 de Bruxelles Logement, Service Public R\u00e9gional de Bruxelles, du 6 avril 2022 par laquelle le recours du 16 mars 2022 contre les d\u00e9cisions de la Cellule logements inoccup\u00e9s (CLI) du 07\/02\/2019, 06\/08\/2021 et 23\/11\/2021 imposant des amendes pour le logement situ\u00e9 \u00e0 1190 Bruxelles, avenue Albert, 42, est rejet\u00e9 comme irrecevable en raison de son retard \u00bb.<br \/>\n       II. Proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       Le dossier administratif a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9.<br \/>\n       Les m\u00e9moires en r\u00e9ponse et en r\u00e9plique ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement \u00e9chang\u00e9s.<br \/>\n       Mme Laurence Lejeune, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 un rapport sur la base de l\u2019article 12 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       XV &#8211; 5972 &#8211; 1\/3<br \/>\n       Le rapport a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat le 30 ao\u00fbt 2023 et le requ\u00e9rant est r\u00e9put\u00e9 l\u2019avoir re\u00e7u le 19 septembre 2023, apr\u00e8s deux rappels de notification des 4 et 18 septembre.<br \/>\n       Mme Laurence Lejeune, premier auditeur, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note, le 7 mars 2024, demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 14quater de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 du R\u00e9gent du 23 ao\u00fbt 1948 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure devant la section du contentieux administratif du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat.<br \/>\n       Par un courrier d\u00e9pos\u00e9 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, le 12 mars 2024, que le requ\u00e9rant est r\u00e9put\u00e9 avoir re\u00e7u le 22 mars, apr\u00e8s un rappel de notification du 18 mars, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 celui-ci que la chambre allait statuer en d\u00e9cr\u00e9tant le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance \u00e0 moins qu\u2019il ne demande, dans un d\u00e9lai de quinze jours, \u00e0 \u00eatre entendu.<br \/>\n       Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.<br \/>\n       III. \u00c9lection de domicile<br \/>\n       Par un courrier du 1er septembre 2023, le conseil du requ\u00e9rant a inform\u00e9 le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat qu\u2019il ne repr\u00e9sentait plus son client et que, partant, celui-ci ne faisait plus \u00e9lection de domicile \u00e0 son cabinet.<br \/>\n       Toutefois, le requ\u00e9rant n\u2019a pas modifi\u00e9 son domicile \u00e9lu aupr\u00e8s du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, malgr\u00e9 un courriel du 27 septembre 2023 de son ancien conseil, l\u2019invitant \u00e0 le faire. Partant, le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat ne peut que maintenir l\u2019\u00e9lection de domicile existante, pour les besoins de la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       IV. D\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance<br \/>\n       L\u2019article 21, alin\u00e9a 7, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose qu\u2019il existe, dans le chef de la partie requ\u00e9rante, une pr\u00e9somption de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance lorsqu\u2019elle n\u2019introduit aucune demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans un d\u00e9lai de trente jours \u00e0 compter de la notification d\u2019un rapport de l\u2019auditeur concluant au rejet du recours.<br \/>\n       Le requ\u00e9rant ayant son domicile \u00e0 New York (\u00c9tats-Unis d\u2019Am\u00e9rique), le d\u00e9lai de 60 jours dont il disposait pour d\u00e9poser son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique a \u00e9t\u00e9<br \/>\n       XV &#8211; 5972 &#8211; 2\/3<br \/>\n       prolong\u00e9 de 90 jours et port\u00e9 \u00e0 150 jours, en vertu de l\u2019article 89 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       Le requ\u00e9rant n\u2019ayant pas introduit de demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans le d\u00e9lai imparti et n\u2019ayant pas non plus demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendu, il est pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 l\u00e9galement se d\u00e9sister de son recours.<br \/>\n       V. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       Dans son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse, la partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, \u00e0 la charge du requ\u00e9rant. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.<br \/>\n       PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :<br \/>\n       Article 1er.<br \/>\n       Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance est d\u00e9cr\u00e9t\u00e9.<br \/>\n       Article 2.<br \/>\n       Le requ\u00e9rant supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 22 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.<br \/>\n       Ainsi prononc\u00e9, \u00e0 Bruxelles, le 29 novembre 2024, par la XVe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :<br \/>\n       \u00c9lisabeth Willemart, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sidente f.f., Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Quintin, greffier.<br \/>\n       Le Greffier, La Pr\u00e9sidente,<br \/>\n       Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Quintin \u00c9lisabeth Willemart<br \/>\n       XV &#8211; 5972 &#8211; 3\/3<\/p>\n<p>Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600\n       <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Action LOG \nfunction JUPORTARecordLogViewDecision  $iubel_id        : 280287\n                                       $action_type     : VIEW\n                                      &amp;$action_startmt  : 1780494688.0181\n                                      &amp;$action_duration : 19088\n                                      &amp;$addressipremote : 103.115.10.116\n                                      &amp;$latitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$longitude       : null\n                                      &amp;$accuracy        : null\n                                      &amp;$altitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$langue_view     : FR\n--><br \/>\n<!-- Action_duration 19088 millisec --><br \/>\n      <!-- end of main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>    <!-- end of division \"page_main\" --><\/p>\n<p>              &#9993; info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n<p>              &copy;&nbsp; 2017-2026&nbsp;Service ICT &#8211; SPF Justice<\/p>\n<p>  <!-- end of division \"conteneur\" --><\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><\/p>\n<p>\n          Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n      <\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa Start --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa End --><\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/juportal.be\/content\/ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600\/FR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#8217;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#8217;onglet Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 29 novembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 No R\u00f4le: A. 236649\/XV-5972 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261600 &#8211; Logement &#8211; 29\/11\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#8217;introduction: 2024-12-13 Consultations: 100 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-02 19:25 Fiche Arr\u00eat&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[154528],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[7735,17415,16160,14751,15545],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1170679","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-261-600","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-demande","kji_keyword-domicile","kji_keyword-requerant","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#039;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#039;onglet Conseil d&#039;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 29 novembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 No R\u00f4le: A. 236649\/XV-5972 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261600 - Logement - 29\/11\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#039;introduction: 2024-12-13 Consultations: 100 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-02 19:25 Fiche Arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-22T12:11:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 29 novembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 No R\u00f4le: A. 236649\/XV-5972 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261600 - Logement - 29\/11\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-12-13 Consultations: 100 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-02 19:25 Fiche Arr\u00eat...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-22T12:11:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-600\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.600"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1170679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1170679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1170679"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1170679"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1170679"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1170679"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1170679"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1170679"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1170679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}