{"id":1178362,"date":"2026-06-23T13:49:19","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T11:49:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T13:49:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T11:49:19","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-261-737","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 décembre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 242274\/XV-6013<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 261737 – Police, sauf personnel – 13\/12\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-12-16<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

101 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 02:00<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 261.737 du 13 d\u00e9cembre 2024 Institutions, Int\u00e9rieur et pouvoirs
\n locaux – Police, sauf personnel D\u00e9cision : Non lieu \u00e0 statuer\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XVe CHAMBRE
\n no 261.737 du 13 d\u00e9cembre 2024
\n A. 242.274\/XV-6013
\n En cause : D.U., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Nicolas DUCHATELET, avocat, boulevard d\u2019Avroy 280
\n 4000 Li\u00e8ge,
\n contre :
\n la commune de Sprimont, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son coll\u00e8ge communal.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite, par la voie \u00e9lectronique, le 24 juin 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande, d\u2019une part, la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution et, d\u2019autre part, l\u2019annulation, de la d\u00e9cision de Monsieur le bourgmestre de la commune de Sprimont du 24 avril 2024 d\u00e9clarant le logement du requ\u00e9rant sis All\u00e9e des Renards \u00bd – 4141
\n Sprimont inhabitable et ordonnant sa d\u00e9molition.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n M. Laurent Jans, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 un rapport sur la base de l\u2019article 93 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure et de l\u2019article 12 de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 royal du 5 d\u00e9cembre 1991 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 devant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat concluant \u00e0 l\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9.
\n Le rapport a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties.
\n Par un courrier du 18 septembre 2024, la partie adverse a inform\u00e9 le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat du retrait de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.
\n XV – 6013 – 1\/3
\n Par une ordonnance du 24 octobre 2024 et en l\u2019absence d\u2019objection de l\u2019auditeur rapporteur, la chambre a propos\u00e9 aux parties que l\u2019affaire ne soit pas appel\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 26, \u00a7 2, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure. Le rapport \u00e9tait joint \u00e0 cette ordonnance.
\n Aucune partie n\u2019a sollicit\u00e9 la tenue d\u2019une audience.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Perte d\u2019objet
\n L\u2019auditeur rapporteur a examin\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent recours dans le cadre de la proc\u00e9dure en d\u00e9bats succincts, \u00e9tant d\u2019avis que l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 devait \u00eatre annul\u00e9.
\n Toutefois, par une d\u00e9cision du 17 septembre 2024, la partie adverse a retir\u00e9 l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9. Cette d\u00e9cision de retrait a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante le 20 septembre, et celle-ci a indiqu\u00e9, dans un courriel du 8 octobre 2024, qu\u2019elle n\u2019entendait pas introduire de recours contre cette d\u00e9cision de retrait. Il s\u2019ensuit que le retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 peut \u00eatre tenu pour d\u00e9finitif, ce qui prive le recours de son objet, de sorte qu\u2019il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer, ni sur le recours en annulation, ni sur la demande de suspension.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et d\u00e9pens
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n La disparition de l’acte attaqu\u00e9, cons\u00e9quence de son retrait, constitue une forme de succ\u00e9dan\u00e9 d’une annulation contentieuse de sorte que la partie requ\u00e9rante peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme ayant obtenu gain de cause, au sens de l’article 30\/1 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d’\u00c9tat et qu’il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.
\n Le retrait de l’acte attaqu\u00e9 justifie que les autres d\u00e9pens soient \u00e9galement mis \u00e0 charge de la partie adverse.
\n XV – 6013 – 2\/3
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer tant sur la demande de suspension que sur la requ\u00eate en annulation.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie adverse supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 13 d\u00e9cembre 2024, par la XVe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Marc Joassart, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Caroline Hug\u00e9, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Caroline Hug\u00e9 Marc Joassart
\n XV – 6013 – 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 d\u00e9cembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 No R\u00f4le: A. 242274\/XV-6013 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261737 – Police, sauf personnel – 13\/12\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-12-16 Consultations: 101 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 02:00…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[155517],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[7735,96915,17415,8464,100565],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1178362","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-261-737","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-attaque","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_keyword-retrait","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 d\u00e9cembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 No R\u00f4le: A. 242274\/XV-6013 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261737 - Police, sauf personnel - 13\/12\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-12-16 Consultations: 101 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 02:00...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T11:49:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 13 d\u00e9cembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 No R\u00f4le: A. 242274\/XV-6013 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261737 - Police, sauf personnel - 13\/12\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-12-16 Consultations: 101 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-03 02:00...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-23T11:49:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-261-737\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.737"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1178362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1178362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1178362"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1178362"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1178362"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1178362"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1178362"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1178362"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1178362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}