{"id":1180095,"date":"2026-06-23T18:56:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T16:56:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T18:56:44","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T16:56:44","slug":"eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Inhoudsindicatie.<\/strong> 4 juni 2004 Eerste Kamer Rek.nr. R04\/003HR JMH\/AS Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Beschikking in de zaak van: [Verzoeker], wonende te [woonplaats], VERZOEKER tot cassatie. 1. Het geding in cassatie…<\/p>\n

4 juni 2004<\/p>\n

Eerste Kamer<\/p>\n

Rek.nr. R04\/003HR<\/p>\n

JMH\/AS<\/p>\n

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden<\/p>\n

Beschikking<\/p>\n

in de zaak van:<\/p>\n

[Verzoeker],<\/p>\n

wonende te [woonplaats],<\/p>\n

VERZOEKER tot cassatie.<\/p>\n

1. Het geding in cassatie<\/p>\n

Met een op 14 oktober 2003 gedateerd en op 17 oktober 2003 ter griffie van de Hoge Raad ingekomen verzoekschrift heeft verzoeker tot cassatie – verder te noemen: [verzoeker] – zich gewend tot de Hoge Raad en verzocht de uitspraak van het gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage van 18 juli 2003 (nummer 2002\/01443), waarbij de vorderingen van [verzoeker] zouden zijn afgewezen, te vernietigen.<\/p>\n

Voormelde uitspraak van het hof is door [verzoeker] niet overgelegd.<\/p>\n

De conclusie van de Advocaat-Generaal L. Strikwerda strekt tot niet-ontvankelijkverklaring van [verzoeker] in zijn cassatieberoep.<\/p>\n

[Verzoeker] heeft bij brief van 13 april 2004 op de conclusie gereageerd.<\/p>\n

2. Beoordeling van de ontvankelijkheid van het beroep<\/p>\n

[Verzoeker] kan in zijn verzoek, dat kennelijk ertoe strekt cassatieberoep in te stellen tegen de onder 1 vermelde uitspraak van het gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage, niet worden ontvangen. Indien moet worden aangenomen dat de bij het hof gevoerde procedure een dagvaardings-procedure is, had het cassatieberoep ingevolge het bepaalde in art. 407 lid 1 Rv. bij dagvaarding moeten worden ingesteld. De onder 1 vermelde brief van 14 oktober 2003 is geen dagvaarding. Indien aangenomen moet worden dat de bestreden uitspraak is gegeven op rekest, had het verzoekschrift ingevolge het bepaalde in art. 426a lid 1 Rv. getekend moeten worden door een advocaat bij de Hoge Raad. De voormelde brief van 14 oktober 2003 is niet getekend door een advocaat bij de Hoge Raad.<\/p>\n

3. Beslissing<\/p>\n

De Hoge Raad verklaart [verzoeker] niet-ontvankelijk in zijn verzoek.<\/p>\n

Deze beschikking is gegeven door de raadsheren D.H. Beukenhorst, als voorzitter, O. de Savornin Lohman en A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, en in het openbaar uitgesproken door de raadsheer A. Hammerstein op 4 juni 2004.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtspraak.nl open data, Creative Commons Zero. Volume cible 1.8M decisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

4 juni 2004 Eerste Kamer Rek.nr. R04\/003HR JMH\/AS Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Beschikking in de zaak van: [Verzoeker], wonende te [woonplaats], VERZOEKER tot cassatie. 1. Het geding in cassatie…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7669],"kji_court":[7834],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135725],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8609,7812,13116,63908,8602],"kji_language":[7671],"class_list":["post-1180095","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-pays-bas","kji_court-hoge-raad","kji_year-135725","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-cassatie","kji_keyword-eerste","kji_keyword-kamer","kji_keyword-nederlanden","kji_keyword-verzoeker","kji_language-nl"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"4 juni 2004 Eerste Kamer Rek.nr. R04\/003HR JMH\/AS Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Beschikking in de zaak van: [Verzoeker], wonende te [woonplaats], VERZOEKER tot cassatie. 1. Het geding in cassatie...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \\\/ R04\\\/003HR - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T16:56:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \\\/ R04\\\/003HR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR","og_description":"4 juni 2004 Eerste Kamer Rek.nr. R04\/003HR JMH\/AS Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Beschikking in de zaak van: [Verzoeker], wonende te [woonplaats], VERZOEKER tot cassatie. 1. Het geding in cassatie...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/","name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-23T16:56:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao5667-hoge-raad-04-06-2004-r04-003hr\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO5667 Hoge Raad , 04-06-2004 \/ R04\/003HR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1180095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1180095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1180095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1180095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1180095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1180095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1180095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1180095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1180095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}