{"id":1180771,"date":"2026-06-23T21:10:58","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T19:10:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T21:10:58","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T19:10:58","slug":"eclibervsce2024ord-16-126","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Ordonnance du 16 décembre 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 243256\/XI-24949<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Ordonnance de cassation 16126 – Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers – 16\/12\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-12-23<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

96 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-23 08:42<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Ordonnance de cassation no 16.126 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2024 Etrangers – Conseil
\n du Contentieux des Etrangers D\u00e9cision : Non admis\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Section administration\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

ERROR JUPORTARobotRecordLienECLI WARNING ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 no lien 280588 identiques <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D’\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n ORDONNANCE RENDUE EN PROC\u00c9DURE
\n D\u2019ADMISSIBILIT\u00c9 DES RECOURS EN CASSATION
\n no 16.126 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2024
\n A. 243.256\/XI-24.949
\n En cause : XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Sevda KARSIKAYA, avocat, place Colignon 37
\n 1030 Bruxelles,
\n contre :
\n l\u2019\u00c9tat belge, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par la Secr\u00e9taire d\u2019\u00c9tat \u00e0 l\u2019Asile et la Migration, adjoint \u00e0 la ministre de l\u2019Int\u00e9rieur.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 18 octobre 2024, les parties requ\u00e9rantes sollicitent la cassation de l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 313.176 du 19 septembre 2024 rendu par le Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers dans l\u2019affaire 313.842\/III.
\n Le dossier de la proc\u00e9dure a \u00e9t\u00e9 communiqu\u00e9 le 6 d\u00e9cembre 2024 par le Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers.
\n Il est fait application de l\u2019article 20 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat et de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 royal du 30 novembre 2006 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure en cassation devant le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, notamment les articles 7 \u00e0 11.
\n Il est \u00e9galement fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois \u2018sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat\u2019, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n D\u00e9cision du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat sur le moyen unique
\n Contrairement \u00e0 ce que soutiennent les parties requ\u00e9rantes, le courrier \u00e9lectronique de la partie adverse du 20 f\u00e9vrier 2024 ne confirme pas que la premi\u00e8re notification des d\u00e9cisions initialement attaqu\u00e9es n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 que partielle.
\n Ce courrier \u00e9lectronique fait uniquement \u00e9tat de la communication en ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126
\n XI -24.949- 1\/3
\n \u00ab pi\u00e8ce jointe (d\u2019)un courrier \u00e9lectronique adress\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019attention de l\u2019ambassade belge d\u2019Istanbul contenant la motivation compl\u00e8te \u00bb des actes initialement attaqu\u00e9s.
\n Le premier juge, examinant les arguments des parties, a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que \u00ab la partie [adverse] [a] en effet renvoy\u00e9 le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2024 l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de la motivation des d\u00e9cisions entreprises \u00bb. L\u2019utilisation du verbe \u00ab renvoyer \u00bb et non du verbe \u00ab envoyer \u00bb \u00e9tablit que le premier juge avait consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de cette motivation avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 envoy\u00e9e une premi\u00e8re fois aux parties requ\u00e9rantes.
\n En tant qu\u2019il repose sur le postulat contraire, le moyen manque en fait.
\n Par ailleurs, l\u2019article 39\/57, \u00a7 1er, alin\u00e9a 1er, de la loi du 15 d\u00e9cembre 1980 sur l\u2019acc\u00e8s au territoire, le s\u00e9jour, l\u2019\u00e9tablissement et l\u2019\u00e9loignement des \u00e9trangers ne r\u00e8gle pas le lieu o\u00f9 doit \u00eatre op\u00e9r\u00e9e la notification d\u2019une d\u00e9cision de la partie adverse.
\n Le moyen est donc manifestement irrecevable en tant qu\u2019il invoque la violation de cette disposition.
\n Pour le surplus, le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, statuant en cassation, n\u2019est pas un juge d\u2019appel. Il n\u2019est pas comp\u00e9tent pour substituer son appr\u00e9ciation des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause \u00e0 celle du Conseil du contentieux des \u00e9trangers. Les critiques par lesquelles les parties requ\u00e9rantes invitent le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat \u00e0 substituer son appr\u00e9ciation des faits de la cause \u00e0 celle du premier juge et \u00e0 d\u00e9cider qu\u2019au regard de ces faits, et notamment de l\u2019\u00e9change de correspondance entre leur conseil et la partie adverse, la seconde notification des d\u00e9cisions initialement attaqu\u00e9es, et donc le point de d\u00e9part ultime du d\u00e9lai de recours, est intervenue le 27 f\u00e9vrier et non le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2024, sont donc manifestement irrecevables.
\n Le moyen est donc partiellement manifestement non fond\u00e9 et partiellement manifestement irrecevable.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Le recours en cassation n\u2019est pas admissible.
\n Article 2.
\n XI -24.949- 2\/3
\n Les parties requ\u00e9rantes supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 600 euros et la contribution de 24 euros, \u00e0 concurrence de 208 euros chacune.
\n Ainsi rendu \u00e0 Bruxelles, le 16 d\u00e9cembre 2024, par :
\n Denis Delvax, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, Katty Lauvau, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Conseiller,
\n Katty Lauvau Denis Delvax
\n XI -24.949- 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Ordonnance du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 No R\u00f4le: A. 243256\/XI-24949 Affaire: Ordonnance de cassation 16126 – Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers – 16\/12\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-12-23 Consultations: 96 -…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[155784],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[8424,17415,129163,8464,95093],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1180771","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024ord-16-126","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-contentieux","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_keyword-etrangers","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Ordonnance du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 No R\u00f4le: A. 243256\/XI-24949 Affaire: Ordonnance de cassation 16126 - Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers - 16\/12\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-12-23 Consultations: 96 -...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T19:10:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Ordonnance du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 No R\u00f4le: A. 243256\/XI-24949 Affaire: Ordonnance de cassation 16126 - Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers - 16\/12\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-12-23 Consultations: 96 -...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-23T19:10:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024ord-16-126\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ORD.16.126"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1180771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1180771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1180771"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1180771"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1180771"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1180771"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1180771"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1180771"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1180771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}