{"id":1196007,"date":"2026-06-25T22:17:46","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T20:17:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/"},"modified":"2026-06-25T22:17:46","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T20:17:46","slug":"eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Inhoudsindicatie.<\/strong> Vervolg op HR NJ 2003, 2: HR verwerpt cassatieberoep met toepassing van art. 81 RO.<\/p>\n

8 juni 2004<\/p>\n

Strafkamer<\/p>\n

nr. 02927\/03<\/p>\n

SCR\/SM<\/p>\n

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden<\/p>\n

Arrest<\/p>\n

op het beroep in cassatie tegen een arrest van het Gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage van 3 juni 2003, nummer 22\/003866-02, in de strafzaak tegen:<\/p>\n

[verdachte], geboren te [geboorteplaats] op [geboortedatum] 1961, ten tijde van de betekening van de aanzegging uit anderen hoofde gedetineerd in de Penitentiaire Inrichting "Noord Holland Noord" te Heerhugowaard.<\/p>\n

1. De bestreden uitspraak<\/p>\n

Na verwijzing van de zaak door de Hoge Raad bij arrest van 2 juli 2002, heeft het Hof in hoger beroep, voorzover aan 's Hofs oordeel onderworpen, – met vernietiging van een vonnis van de Rechtbank te Amsterdam van 30 maart 2000 – de verdachte ter zake van "medeplegen van handelen in strijd met artikel 26, eerste lid, (oud) van de Wet wapens en munitie en het feit begaan met betrekking tot een wapen van categorie II, meermalen gepleegd", "medeplegen van handelen in strijd met artikel 26, eerste lid, (oud) van de Wet wapens en munitie en het feit begaan met betrekking tot meer dan \u00e9\u00e9n vuurwapen van categorie III" en "medeplegen van handelen in strijd met artikel 26, eerste lid, (oud) van de Wet wapens en munitie, meermalen gepleegd" veroordeeld tot drie jaren en zes maanden gevangenisstraf, met onttrekking aan het verkeer zoals in het arrest omschreven.<\/p>\n

2. Geding in cassatie<\/p>\n

2.1. Het beroep is ingesteld door de verdachte. Namens deze hebben mr. A.G. van der Plas en mr. P.H. Bakker Schut, beiden advocaat te Amsterdam, bij schriftuur middelen van cassatie voorgesteld. De schriftuur is aan dit arrest gehecht en maakt daarvan deel uit.<\/p>\n

De Advocaat-Generaal J\u00f6rg heeft geconcludeerd dat de Hoge Raad het beroep zal verwerpen.<\/p>\n

2.2. De Hoge Raad heeft kennis genomen van het schriftelijk commentaar van mr. Van der Plas op de conclusie van de Advocaat-Generaal.<\/p>\n

3. Beoordeling van de middelen<\/p>\n

De middelen kunnen niet tot cassatie leiden. Dit behoeft, gezien art. 81 RO, geen nadere motivering nu de middelen niet nopen tot beantwoording van rechtsvragen in het belang van de rechtseenheid of de rechtsontwikkeling.<\/p>\n

4. Slotsom<\/p>\n

Nu de middelen niet tot cassatie kunnen leiden, terwijl de Hoge Raad ook geen grond aanwezig oordeelt waarop de bestreden uitspraak ambtshalve zou behoren te worden vernietigd, moet het beroep worden verworpen.<\/p>\n

5. Beslissing<\/p>\n

De Hoge Raad verwerpt het beroep.<\/p>\n

Dit arrest is gewezen door de vice-president F.H. Koster als voorzitter, en de raadsheren J.L.M. Urlings en A.J.A. van Dorst, in bijzijn van de waarnemend-griffier L.J.J. Okker-Braber, en uitgesproken op 8 juni 2004.<\/p>\n

Mr. Urlings is buiten staat dit arrest te ondertekenen.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtspraak.nl open data, Creative Commons Zero. Volume cible 1.8M decisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Vervolg op HR NJ 2003, 2: HR verwerpt cassatieberoep met toepassing van art. 81 RO.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7669],"kji_court":[7834],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135725],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[15038,8610,12713,27508],"kji_language":[7671],"class_list":["post-1196007","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-pays-bas","kji_court-hoge-raad","kji_year-135725","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-cassatieberoep","kji_keyword-toepassing","kji_keyword-vervolg","kji_keyword-verwerpt","kji_language-nl"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vervolg op HR NJ 2003, 2: HR verwerpt cassatieberoep met toepassing van art. 81 RO.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \\\/ 02927\\\/03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-25T20:17:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \\\/ 02927\\\/03\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03","og_description":"Vervolg op HR NJ 2003, 2: HR verwerpt cassatieberoep met toepassing van art. 81 RO.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/","name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-25T20:17:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao9645-hoge-raad-08-06-2004-02927-03\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO9645 Hoge Raad , 08-06-2004 \/ 02927\/03"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1196007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1196007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1196007"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1196007"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1196007"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1196007"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1196007"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1196007"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1196007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}