{"id":1202091,"date":"2026-06-27T02:23:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:23:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T02:23:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:23:40","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 44 DU 2 MAI 2012<\/p>\n

MA\u00ceTRE TAMARO SEYDI C\/ WALID CHANINE ET AUTRES<\/p>\n

JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS \u2013 OBLIGATION DE MOTIVATION \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE MO- TIFS \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOTIF DUBITATIF \u2013 APPLICATION DIVERSE<\/p>\n

Selon l\u2019article 6 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 1984 portant organisation judiciaire au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, tout jugement doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9, \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 et le motif dubitatif \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 un d\u00e9faut de motifs.<\/p>\n

Viole ce texte, la Cour d\u2019Appel qui a \u00e9nonc\u00e9 que l\u2019\u00e9tude a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement de l\u2019acte, ce qui laisse supposer que les intim\u00e9s ont pay\u00e9 les frais y aff\u00e9rents.<\/p>\n

LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat confirmatif attaqu\u00e9, que Tamaro Seydi, notaire \u00e0 Dakar, a \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9e \u00e0 proc\u00e9der aux formalit\u00e9s d\u2019immatriculation de la SCI Al Ghadir, remettre les statuts, le registre de commerce, le NINEA et \u00e9ventuellement le reliquat du capital apr\u00e8s d\u00e9duction des frais sous astreinte de 100 000 F CFA par jour de retard ;<\/p>\n

Sur le deuxi\u00e8me moyen tir\u00e9 du d\u00e9faut de motifs, en ce que, la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 au no- taire Tamaro Seydi de proc\u00e9der aux formalit\u00e9s d\u2019immatriculation de la SCI Al Ghadir, remettre les statuts, le registre du commerce, le NINEA et \u00e9ventuellement le reliquat du capital apr\u00e8s d\u00e9- duction des frais sous astreinte de 100 000 F par jour de retard, au motif que \u00ab l\u2019\u00e9tude a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement de l\u2019acte ce qui laisse supposer \u00e9galement que les intim\u00e9s ont pay\u00e9 les frais y aff\u00e9rents \u00bb alors qu\u2019elle n\u2019a pas la certitude que le compte du tireur a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectivement d\u00e9bit\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019article 6 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 1984 ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon ce texte, qu\u2019un jugement doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9 \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 ; que le motif dubita- tif \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 un d\u00e9faut de motifs ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, qu\u2019apr\u00e8s avoir relev\u00e9 que \u00ab les seuls arguments suivants lesquels le ch\u00e8que a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sans indication du nom du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire et n\u2019a pas fait l\u2019objet d\u2019un re\u00e7u l\u00e9gal ne sont pas perti- nents ; qu\u2019en effet, le notaire n\u2019a pas soutenu n\u2019avoir pas encaiss\u00e9 le ch\u00e8que qui porte son ca- chet \u00bb, la Cour d\u2019Appel, pour retenir que \u00ab le premier juge \u00e9tait fond\u00e9 \u00e0 rendre l\u2019ordonnance entreprise \u00bb, \u00e9nonce que \u00ab l\u2019\u00e9tude a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement de l\u2019acte, ce qui laisse supposer \u00e9galement que les intim\u00e9s ont pay\u00e9 les frais y aff\u00e9rents \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant par de tels motifs, qui sont dubitatifs, la Cour d\u2019Appel n\u2019a pas satisfait aux exi- gences du texte susvis\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats nos 4-5<\/p>\n

84 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS ;<\/p>\n

Et sans qu\u2019il y ait lieu de statuer sur les autres moyens :<\/p>\n

Casse et annule, dans toutes ses dispositions, l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 873 rendu le 28 d\u00e9cembre 2010, entre les parties, par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Remet, en cons\u00e9quence, la cause et les parties au m\u00eame et semblable \u00e9tat o\u00f9 elles \u00e9taient avant ledit arr\u00eat et, pour \u00eatre fait droit, les renvoie devant la Cour d\u2019Appel de Kaolack ;<\/p>\n

Condamne Walid Chanine et autres aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar, en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audien- ce publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Mouhamadou DIAWARA ; CONSEILLERS : Jean Louis Paul TOUPANE, Mouhamadou Bachir S\u00c8YE, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY ; RAPPORTEUR : Waly FAYE ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; AVOCAT : Me Boubacar WADE ; GREF- FIER : Me Macodou NDIAYE.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre civile et commerciale 85<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 44 DU 2 MAI 2012 MA\u00ceTRE TAMARO SEYDI C\/ WALID CHANINE ET AUTRES JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS \u2013 OBLIGATION DE MOTIVATION \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE MO- TIFS \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOTIF DUBITATIF \u2013 APPLICATION DIVERSE Selon l\u2019article 6 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 1984 portant organisation judiciaire au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, tout jugement doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9, \u00e0 peine de…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135536],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1202091","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135536","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 44 DU 2 MAI 2012 MA\u00ceTRE TAMARO SEYDI C\/ WALID CHANINE ET AUTRES JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS \u2013 OBLIGATION DE MOTIVATION \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE MO- TIFS \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOTIF DUBITATIF \u2013 APPLICATION DIVERSE Selon l\u2019article 6 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 1984 portant organisation judiciaire au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, tout jugement doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9, \u00e0 peine de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-27T00:23:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 44 DU 2 MAI 2012 MA\u00ceTRE TAMARO SEYDI C\/ WALID CHANINE ET AUTRES JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS \u2013 OBLIGATION DE MOTIVATION \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE MO- TIFS \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOTIF DUBITATIF \u2013 APPLICATION DIVERSE Selon l\u2019article 6 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 1984 portant organisation judiciaire au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, tout jugement doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9, \u00e0 peine de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-27T00:23:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-2-mai-2012\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 2 MAI 2012"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1202091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1202091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1202091"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1202091"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1202091"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1202091"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1202091"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1202091"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1202091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}