{"id":1202104,"date":"2026-06-27T02:24:29","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:24:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T02:24:29","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:24:29","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 09 DU 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012<\/p>\n

SERIGNE BABACAR SECK C\/ CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL DE KAOLACK ET GOUVERNEUR DE LA R\u00c9GION DE KAOLACK<\/p>\n

ACTE ADMINISTRATIF \u2013 D\u00c9CISION DU PR\u00c9SIDENT DU CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL PORTANT RETRAIT DE L\u2019AUTORISATION D\u2019AMODIATION DE DROITS DE CHASSE POUR MANQUEMENTS GRAVES \u2013 VALIDIT\u00c9 \u2013 RESPECT DU PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 CHAMP D\u2019APPLICATION<\/p>\n

Viole le principe du contradictoire et encourt l\u2019annulation de ce chef, la d\u00e9cision du Pr\u00e9sident d\u2019un conseil r\u00e9gional portant retrait de l\u2019autorisation d\u2019amodiation de droits de chasse pour manquements graves, d\u00e8s lors que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 mis \u00e0 m\u00eame de discuter des griefs articul\u00e9s contre lui.<\/p>\n

LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du recours :<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, le conseil r\u00e9gional de Kaolack conclut \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours, au motif qu\u2019il a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduit plus de deux mois apr\u00e8s la notification de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 attaqu\u00e9, intervenue le 25 novembre 2010 et un mois apr\u00e8s la saisine du repr\u00e9sentant de l\u2019\u00c9tat ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que le requ\u00e9rant a adress\u00e9 le 25 janvier 2011 un recours gracieux au Gouverneur de la r\u00e9gion de Kaolack ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant qu\u2019il est de principe que, sauf dans le cas o\u00f9 des dispositions l\u00e9gislatives ou r\u00e9- glementaires ont organis\u00e9 des proc\u00e9dures particuli\u00e8res, toute d\u00e9cision administrative peut \u00eatre l\u2019objet, dans le d\u00e9lai imparti pour l\u2019introduction d\u2019un recours contentieux, d\u2019un recours gracieux ou hi\u00e9rarchique qui interrompt le cours de ce d\u00e9lai ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019ainsi le requ\u00e9rant, qui dans le d\u00e9lai de deux mois, a saisi le repr\u00e9sentant de l\u2019\u00c9tat d\u2019un re- cours gracieux, a b\u00e9n\u00e9fici\u00e9 de la prorogation dudit d\u00e9lai ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que son recours, introduit le 28 f\u00e9vrier 2011, est recevable ;<\/p>\n

Sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de statuer sur les autres moyens du requ\u00e9rant, sur le moyen tir\u00e9 de la violation du principe du contradictoire, en ce que, pour lui retirer l\u2019autorisation d\u2019amodiation de droits de chasse, l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 attaqu\u00e9 se fonde sur les manquements graves consign\u00e9s dans le rap- port d\u2019\u00e9valuation des Plans de Travail annuels concert\u00e9s (PTAC) Campagne 2005-2006 et sur l\u2019absence de correctifs \u00e0 ces manquements, alors qu\u2019il n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu en ses moyens de d\u00e9- fense, lors de l\u2019\u00e9laboration dudit rapport ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre administrative 217<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que la d\u00e9cision, qui a retir\u00e9 \u00e0 Babacar Seck l\u2019autorisation d\u2019amodiation des droits de chasse dans la zone cyn\u00e9g\u00e9tique du Baobolong, a pour motif le non-respect du cahier des charges ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte de l\u2019article 25 al 2 dudit cahier des charges que des \u00e9valuations ap- profondies sont pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 la quatri\u00e8me et derni\u00e8re ann\u00e9e du contrat et doivent \u00eatre effectu\u00e9es en pr\u00e9sence de l\u2019amodiataire ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que les manquements reproch\u00e9s au requ\u00e9rant sont consign\u00e9s dans les rapports d\u2019\u00e9valuation des Plans de Travail annuels concert\u00e9s (PTAC) 2005-2006, desquels il r\u00e9sulte que, lors de leur \u00e9laboration, Seck n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 appel\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e, en proc\u00e9dant au retrait d\u2019un avantage acquis sans que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire n\u2019ait \u00e9t\u00e9 mis \u00e0 m\u00eame de pr\u00e9senter ses moyens de d\u00e9fense, m\u00e9conna\u00eet le principe du contradictoire et, par cons\u00e9quent, celui du respect des droits de la d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit qu\u2019elle encourt l\u2019annulation ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

D\u00e9clare recevable le recours de Babacar Seck ;<\/p>\n

Annule l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 n\u00b0 0011\/CR-KL\/Pdt du 13 octobre 2010 du Pr\u00e9sident du conseil r\u00e9gional de Kaolack portant retrait de l\u2019autorisation d\u2019amodiation des droits de chasse accord\u00e9e \u00e0 Babacar Seck dans la zone d\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat cyn\u00e9g\u00e9tique du Baobolong ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende consign\u00e9e.<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT DE CHAMBRE : Fatou Habibatou DIALLO ; CONSEILLERS : El Hadji Ma- lick SOW, Abdoulaye NDIAYE, Amadou BAL, Mback\u00e9 FALL ; RAPPORTEUR : Amadou BAL ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; AVOCAT : Me Samba AMETTI ; GREFFIER : Cheikh DIOP.<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 4-5<\/p>\n

218 Chambre administrative<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 09 DU 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 SERIGNE BABACAR SECK C\/ CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL DE KAOLACK ET GOUVERNEUR DE LA R\u00c9GION DE KAOLACK ACTE ADMINISTRATIF \u2013 D\u00c9CISION DU PR\u00c9SIDENT DU CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL PORTANT RETRAIT DE L\u2019AUTORISATION D\u2019AMODIATION DE DROITS DE CHASSE POUR MANQUEMENTS GRAVES \u2013 VALIDIT\u00c9 \u2013 RESPECT DU PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 CHAMP D\u2019APPLICATION Viole le…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135536],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8457,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1202104","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135536","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 09 DU 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 SERIGNE BABACAR SECK C\/ CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL DE KAOLACK ET GOUVERNEUR DE LA R\u00c9GION DE KAOLACK ACTE ADMINISTRATIF \u2013 D\u00c9CISION DU PR\u00c9SIDENT DU CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL PORTANT RETRAIT DE L\u2019AUTORISATION D\u2019AMODIATION DE DROITS DE CHASSE POUR MANQUEMENTS GRAVES \u2013 VALIDIT\u00c9 \u2013 RESPECT DU PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 CHAMP D\u2019APPLICATION Viole le...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-27T00:24:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 09 DU 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 SERIGNE BABACAR SECK C\/ CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL DE KAOLACK ET GOUVERNEUR DE LA R\u00c9GION DE KAOLACK ACTE ADMINISTRATIF \u2013 D\u00c9CISION DU PR\u00c9SIDENT DU CONSEIL R\u00c9GIONAL PORTANT RETRAIT DE L\u2019AUTORISATION D\u2019AMODIATION DE DROITS DE CHASSE POUR MANQUEMENTS GRAVES \u2013 VALIDIT\u00c9 \u2013 RESPECT DU PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 CHAMP D\u2019APPLICATION Viole le...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-27T00:24:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-23-fevrier-2012\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 23 F\u00c9VRIER 2012"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1202104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1202104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1202104"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1202104"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1202104"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1202104"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1202104"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1202104"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1202104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}