{"id":1202105,"date":"2026-06-27T02:24:33","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:24:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T02:24:33","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:24:33","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 13 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012<\/p>\n<p>ALY KONATE C\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 TOTAL \u00c9NERGIE DE L\u2019AFRIQUE DE L\u2019OUEST<\/p>\n<p>CASSATION \u2013 POURVOI EN CASSATION \u2013 MOYEN \u2013 RECEVABILIT\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOYEN CRITIQUANT UN ARR\u00caT QUI S\u2019EST CONFORME \u00c0 LA DOCTRINE DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>Lorsqu\u2019apr\u00e8s cassation, la Cour de renvoi s\u2019est conform\u00e9e \u00e0 la doctrine de l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour supr\u00eame, aucune des parties engag\u00e9es dans la m\u00eame affaire n\u2019est recevable \u00e0 critiquer l\u2019arr\u00eat de renvoi par le m\u00eame grief.<\/p>\n<p>D\u00e8s lors, doit \u00eatre d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable, un moyen qui reproche \u00e0 une cour de renvoi qui, suite \u00e0 une cassation prononc\u00e9e au motif qu\u2019il y a incoh\u00e9rence dans la base de calcul du montant des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et de celui de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9avis, a retenu un revenu mensuel commun comme base de calcul desdites allocations.<\/p>\n<p>LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n<p>Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar a par arr\u00eat infirmatif du 26 juillet 2007 condamn\u00e9 la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Total Energie Afrique de l\u2019Ouest dite TEAO \u00e0 payer \u00e0 Aly Konat\u00e9 la somme de 3 000 000 F \u00e0 titre d\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9avis et celle de 200 000 000 francs \u00e0 titre de dommages- int\u00e9r\u00eats pour licenciement abusif ;<\/p>\n<p>Que ledit arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 cass\u00e9 au motif que pour d\u00e9terminer le montant des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et celui du pr\u00e9avis, la base de calcul retenu est diff\u00e9rente, d\u2019une part, environ 15 000 000 F de re- venu mensuel et d\u2019autre part, 1 300 000 F de salaire mensuel ;<\/p>\n<p>Que par l\u2019arr\u00eat dont est pourvoi, la Cour d\u2019Appel de Saint-Louis a allou\u00e9 3 900 000 F et 65 000 000 F, \u00e0 titre respectivement d\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9avis et de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour licen- ciement abusif ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique du pourvoi tir\u00e9 de la violation de la loi en ce que pour la fixation du mon- tant des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats, la Cour d\u2019Appel n\u2019a retenu que le revenu mensuel alors que l\u2019article L.56 du Code du travail fixe d\u2019autres \u00e9l\u00e9ments pour calculer ce montant ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu que la cassation a \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9e au motif qu\u2019il y a incoh\u00e9rence dans la base de calcul du montant des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et de celui de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9avis ;<\/p>\n<p>Et attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat de renvoi d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 a retenu comme base de calcul un revenu mensuel de 1 600 525 F commun pour le calcul des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 pr\u00e9avis faisant ainsi dispara\u00eetre l\u2019incoh\u00e9rence qui \u00e9tait reproch\u00e9e aux juges du fond ;<\/p>\n<p>Bulletin des Arr\u00eats nos 4-5<\/p>\n<p>!188 Chambre sociale<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019apr\u00e8s cassation, la Cour de renvoi s\u2019\u00e9tant conform\u00e9e \u00e0 la doctrine de l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour supr\u00eame, d\u00e8s lors, aucune des parties engag\u00e9es dans la m\u00eame affaire n\u2019est recevable \u00e0 cri- tiquer l\u2019arr\u00eat de renvoi par le m\u00eame grief.<\/p>\n<p>PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n<p>Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par Aly Konat\u00e9 contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 04 rendu le 8 juillet 2010 par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Saint-Louis.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la chambre sociale de la Cour supr\u00eame, en son audience publi- que ordinaire tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT DE CHAMBRE &#8211; RAPPORTEUR : Awa SOW CABA ; CONSEILLER : Wa- ly FAYE, El Hadj Malick SOW, Amadou Lamine BATHILY, Cheikh Ahmed Tidiane COULI- BALY ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; GREFFIER : Maurice Dioma KAMA.<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n<p>!Chambre sociale 189<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA4-5-2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA4-5-2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 13 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 ALY KONATE C\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 TOTAL \u00c9NERGIE DE L\u2019AFRIQUE DE L\u2019OUEST CASSATION \u2013 POURVOI EN CASSATION \u2013 MOYEN \u2013 RECEVABILIT\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOYEN CRITIQUANT UN ARR\u00caT QUI S\u2019EST CONFORME \u00c0 LA DOCTRINE DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT DE CASSATION Lorsqu\u2019apr\u00e8s cassation, la Cour de renvoi s\u2019est conform\u00e9e \u00e0 la doctrine de l\u2019arr\u00eat de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135536],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8457,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1202105","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135536","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 13 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 ALY KONATE C\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 TOTAL \u00c9NERGIE DE L\u2019AFRIQUE DE L\u2019OUEST CASSATION \u2013 POURVOI EN CASSATION \u2013 MOYEN \u2013 RECEVABILIT\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOYEN CRITIQUANT UN ARR\u00caT QUI S\u2019EST CONFORME \u00c0 LA DOCTRINE DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT DE CASSATION Lorsqu\u2019apr\u00e8s cassation, la Cour de renvoi s\u2019est conform\u00e9e \u00e0 la doctrine de l\u2019arr\u00eat de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-27T00:24:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 13 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 ALY KONATE C\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 TOTAL \u00c9NERGIE DE L\u2019AFRIQUE DE L\u2019OUEST CASSATION \u2013 POURVOI EN CASSATION \u2013 MOYEN \u2013 RECEVABILIT\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT \u2013 CAS \u2013 MOYEN CRITIQUANT UN ARR\u00caT QUI S\u2019EST CONFORME \u00c0 LA DOCTRINE DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT DE CASSATION Lorsqu\u2019apr\u00e8s cassation, la Cour de renvoi s\u2019est conform\u00e9e \u00e0 la doctrine de l\u2019arr\u00eat de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-27T00:24:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-13-du-22-fevrier-2012\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 13 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2012"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1202105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1202105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1202105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1202105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1202105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1202105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1202105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1202105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1202105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}