{"id":1202117,"date":"2026-06-27T02:25:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:25:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T02:25:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T00:25:22","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 04 DU 4 JANVIER 2012<\/p>\n

SERA SA C\/ JACQUES ASSEF<\/p>\n

CONTRATS ET OBLIGATIONS \u2013 CONTRAT TRANSLATIF DE PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 VENTE EN MATI\u00c8RE MOBILI\u00c8RE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS R\u00c9SULTANT DE LA VENTE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS DU VENDEUR \u2013 OBLIGATION DE GARANTIE \u2013 GARANTIE DES VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 EFFET DE LA GARANTIE \u2013 D\u00c9TERMINATION<\/p>\n

En vertu de l\u2019article 297 du Code des obligations civiles et commerciales, lorsque la chose achet\u00e9e pr\u00e9sente un vice cach\u00e9, l\u2019acheteur a le choix entre la rendre en se faisant restituer le prix ou la garder moyennant restitution d\u2019une partie du prix.<\/p>\n

LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires produits ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que par l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 la r\u00e9solution de la vente intervenue entre la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SERA SA et Jacques Assef et portant sur un v\u00e9hicule Laguna II et la restitution de la somme de 15 000 000 F ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 297 du Code des obligations civiles et commerciales et de l\u2019insuffisance de motivation, en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 la d\u00e9fectuosit\u00e9 de la cr\u00e9maill\u00e8re malgr\u00e9 son remplacement comme un vice cach\u00e9 d\u2019une gravit\u00e9 suf- fisante pour rendre le v\u00e9hicule impropre \u00e0 son usage normal alors que, d\u2019une part, seul un expert aurait pu appr\u00e9cier les effets de la r\u00e9paration et, d\u2019autre part, il ressort d\u2019une jurisprudence cons- tante que d\u00e8s lors que les d\u00e9fectuosit\u00e9s de la chose vendue ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9par\u00e9es par le vendeur et que celle-ci fonctionne normalement, l\u2019action en garantie pour vice cach\u00e9 n\u2019est pas recevable ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu qu\u2019apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 que \u00ab le v\u00e9hicule vendu pr\u00e9sentait des d\u00e9fauts cach\u00e9s dus \u00e0 la d\u00e9fectuosit\u00e9 de la cr\u00e9maill\u00e8re, qui le rendaient impropre \u00e0 son usage normal \u00bb la Cour d\u2019Appel a, \u00e0 bon droit, d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que lorsque la chose pr\u00e9sente un vice cach\u00e9, l\u2019acheteur a le choix de la rendre en se faisant restituer le prix ou la garder moyennant restitution d\u2019une partie du prix \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le deuxi\u00e8me moyen tir\u00e9 d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale, en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que Jacques Assef doit b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de l\u2019action en garantie de vice cach\u00e9 alors que celui-ci n\u2019a ja- mais prouv\u00e9 que le vice \u00e9tait ant\u00e9rieur \u00e0 la vente ou \u00e0 la livraison de la chose, laquelle ant\u00e9riori- t\u00e9 de nature technique ne pouvant \u00eatre \u00e9tablie que par un expert ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que le moyen ne tend qu\u2019\u00e0 remettre en cause les appr\u00e9ciations souveraines des juges du fond ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre civile et commerciale 61<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit qu\u2019il est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

Sur le troisi\u00e8me moyen tir\u00e9 du d\u00e9faut de r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 conclusions, en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 la restitution de la somme de 15 000 000 F CFA sans r\u00e9pondre aux conclusions de la SERA du 22 juin 2007 dans lesquelles il a \u00e9t\u00e9 soutenu que Assef n\u2019a vers\u00e9 que la somme de 10 000 000 F, celle de 5 000 000 F port\u00e9e par un ch\u00e8que du 27 octobre 2003 n\u2019ayant jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 encaiss\u00e9e ledit ch\u00e8que \u00e9tant revenu impay\u00e9 pour d\u00e9faut de provision et ayant donn\u00e9 lieu le 8 juin 2004 \u00e0 une condamnation en correctionnel pour \u00e9mission de ch\u00e8que sans provision et paiement de la somme de 5 000 000 F, \u00e0 titre de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que les conclusions, pr\u00e9tendument d\u00e9laiss\u00e9es, ne sont pas produites ;<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SERA contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 23 rendu le 2 mars 2010 par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

La condamne aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar, en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audien- ce publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Mouhamadou DIAWARA ; CONSEILLERS : Jean Louis Paul TOUPANE, Mouhamadou Bachir S\u00c8YE, Waly FAYE ; RAPPORTEUR : Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Abdourahmane DIOUF ; AVOCAT : Me Mayacine TOUNKARA & associ\u00e9s ; GREFFIER : Me Macodou NDIAYE.<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats nos 4-5<\/p>\n

62 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 04 DU 4 JANVIER 2012 SERA SA C\/ JACQUES ASSEF CONTRATS ET OBLIGATIONS \u2013 CONTRAT TRANSLATIF DE PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 VENTE EN MATI\u00c8RE MOBILI\u00c8RE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS R\u00c9SULTANT DE LA VENTE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS DU VENDEUR \u2013 OBLIGATION DE GARANTIE \u2013 GARANTIE DES VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 EFFET DE LA GARANTIE \u2013 D\u00c9TERMINATION En vertu de l\u2019article 297 du Code des obligations…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135536],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8460,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1202117","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135536","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-janvier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 04 DU 4 JANVIER 2012 SERA SA C\/ JACQUES ASSEF CONTRATS ET OBLIGATIONS \u2013 CONTRAT TRANSLATIF DE PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 VENTE EN MATI\u00c8RE MOBILI\u00c8RE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS R\u00c9SULTANT DE LA VENTE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS DU VENDEUR \u2013 OBLIGATION DE GARANTIE \u2013 GARANTIE DES VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 EFFET DE LA GARANTIE \u2013 D\u00c9TERMINATION En vertu de l\u2019article 297 du Code des obligations...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-27T00:25:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 04 DU 4 JANVIER 2012 SERA SA C\/ JACQUES ASSEF CONTRATS ET OBLIGATIONS \u2013 CONTRAT TRANSLATIF DE PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 VENTE EN MATI\u00c8RE MOBILI\u00c8RE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS R\u00c9SULTANT DE LA VENTE \u2013 OBLIGATIONS DU VENDEUR \u2013 OBLIGATION DE GARANTIE \u2013 GARANTIE DES VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 EFFET DE LA GARANTIE \u2013 D\u00c9TERMINATION En vertu de l\u2019article 297 du Code des obligations...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-27T00:25:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-4-du-4-janvier-2012\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 4 du 4 JANVIER 2012"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1202117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1202117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1202117"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1202117"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1202117"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1202117"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1202117"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1202117"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1202117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}