{"id":1209486,"date":"2026-06-28T08:13:11","date_gmt":"2026-06-28T06:13:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/"},"modified":"2026-06-28T08:13:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-28T06:13:11","slug":"eclibervsce2025arr-261-953","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 janvier 2025 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 237049\/VI-22405<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 261953 – March\u00e9s publics – 09\/01\/2025<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2025-01-20<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

75 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-30 03:59<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 261.953 du 9 janvier 2025 March\u00e9s et travaux publics – March\u00e9s
\n publics D\u00e9cision : Non lieu \u00e0 statuer\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA VIe CHAMBRE SI\u00c9GEANT EN R\u00c9F\u00c9R\u00c9
\n no 261.953 du 9 janvier 2025
\n A. 237.049\/VI-22.405
\n En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 en nom collectif DXC TECHNOLOGY BELGIUM, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes France VLASSEMBROUCK et Yassine LAGHMICHE, avocats, rue Royale 145
\n 1000 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la R\u00e9gion wallonne, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son Gouvernement, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Fran\u00e7ois VISEUR, avocat, avenue Louise 140
\n 1050 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet des requ\u00eates
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 17 ao\u00fbt 2022, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 en nom collectif DXC Technology Belgium demande, d\u2019une part, la suspension, selon la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019extr\u00eame urgence, de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision du 19 juillet 2022, notifi\u00e9e le 3 ao\u00fbt 2022, par laquelle la partie adverse attribue \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ATOS BELGIUM le contrat d\u2019ex\u00e9cution M024\/15-2021-08-SPWTLPE (Passeport B\u00e2timent) \u00bb et, d\u2019autre part, l\u2019annulation de cette d\u00e9cision.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Par une ordonnance du 18 ao\u00fbt 2022, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du er 1 septembre 2022.
\n La contribution et le droit vis\u00e9s respectivement aux articles 66, 6\u00b0, et 70
\n du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure ont \u00e9t\u00e9 acquitt\u00e9s.
\n Des courriers du 25 ao\u00fbt 2022 ont remis l\u2019affaire sine die.
\n VIexturg – 22.405 – 1\/4
\n Par une ordonnance du 20 novembre 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2024.
\n M. Xavier Close, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, Pr\u00e9sident f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Iris Quevy, loco Mes France Vlassembrouck et Yassine Laghmiche, avocate, comparaissant pour la partie requ\u00e9rante, et Me Simon Arnould, loco Me Fran\u00e7ois Viseur, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie adverse, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendus en leurs observations.
\n Mme Muriel Vanderhelst, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Perte d\u2019objet
\n Par une d\u00e9cision du 30 septembre 2022, la partie adverse a retir\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision d\u2019attribution du 19 juillet 2022, dont la suspension de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution et l\u2019annulation sont demand\u00e9es, et a r\u00e9attribu\u00e9 le march\u00e9 litigieux \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Athos Belgium. Cette d\u00e9cision de retrait et de r\u00e9attribution a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9e \u00e0 tous les soumissionnaires concern\u00e9s par des courriers recommand\u00e9s du 21 octobre 2022. Ces actes de notification mentionnent les voies de recours ainsi que leurs formes et d\u00e9lais \u00e0 respecter. Aucun recours en annulation n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduit contre cette d\u00e9cision de retrait et de r\u00e9attribution du march\u00e9 litigieux \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Athos Belgium par les autres soumissionnaires dans le d\u00e9lai prescrit. Le retrait de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e peut d\u00e8s lors \u00eatre tenu pour d\u00e9finitif.
\n L\u2019article 30, \u00a7 5, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019Etat, dispose que :
\n \u00ab [l]orsque le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat est saisi d\u2019une demande de suspension et d\u2019une requ\u00eate en annulation, et qu\u2019au cours de la proc\u00e9dure de suspension, le requ\u00e9rant se d\u00e9siste, ou lorsque l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 est retir\u00e9 de sorte qu\u2019il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer, le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat peut se prononcer par un seul et m\u00eame arr\u00eat sur la demande de suspension et sur la requ\u00eate en annulation sans qu\u2019il y ait lieu d\u2019introduire une demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure, et la taxe y aff\u00e9rente n\u2019est pas due \u00bb.
\n VIexturg – 22.405 – 2\/4
\n En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il convient de faire application de cette disposition et de constater que la requ\u00eate en annulation et, partant, la demande de suspension, sont devenues sans objet.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et autres d\u00e9pens
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite la condamnation de la partie adverse au paiement d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 924 euros.
\n En raison du retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9, la partie adverse doit \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme la partie qui succombe dans ce litige et la partie requ\u00e9rante comme celle ayant obtenu gain de cause au sens de l\u2019article 30\/1 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019Etat de sorte que cette derni\u00e8re est en droit de se voir accorder une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Toutefois, en application de l\u2019article 67, \u00a7 2, alin\u00e9a 3, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure, aucune majoration n\u2019est due, l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9.
\n Il y a d\u00e8s lors lieu d\u2019accorder une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.
\n Le retrait de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e justifie \u00e9galement que les autres d\u00e9pens soient mis \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse.
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer ni sur la demande de suspension, ni sur la requ\u00eate en annulation.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie adverse supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200
\n euros, la contribution de 22 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.
\n VIexturg – 22.405 – 3\/4
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles, en audience publique de la VIe chambre si\u00e9geant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, le 9 janvier 2025, par :
\n Xavier Close, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Vincent Durieux, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Vincent Durieux Xavier Close
\n VIexturg – 22.405 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 No R\u00f4le: A. 237049\/VI-22405 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261953 – March\u00e9s publics – 09\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2025-01-20 Consultations: 75 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-30 03:59 Fiche…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[159026],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[16586,21875,17415,16160,9045],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1209486","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2025arr-261-953","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-annulation","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-demande","kji_keyword-suspension","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 No R\u00f4le: A. 237049\/VI-22405 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261953 - March\u00e9s publics - 09\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-20 Consultations: 75 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-30 03:59 Fiche...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-28T06:13:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 09 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 No R\u00f4le: A. 237049\/VI-22405 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 261953 - March\u00e9s publics - 09\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-20 Consultations: 75 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-30 03:59 Fiche...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-28T06:13:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-261-953\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.261.953"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1209486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1209486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1209486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1209486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1209486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1209486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1209486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1209486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1209486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}