{"id":1218177,"date":"2026-06-29T22:50:23","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T20:50:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/"},"modified":"2026-06-29T22:50:23","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T20:50:23","slug":"eclibervsce2025arr-262-014","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 17 janvier 2025 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 232951\/XIII-9187<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 262014 – Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes – 17\/01\/2025<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2025-01-21<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

75 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-23 10:53<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 262.014 du 17 janvier 2025 Am\u00e9nagement du territoire, urbanisme,
\n environnement et affaires connexes – Permis d'urbanisme et permis
\n mixtes D\u00e9cision : Non lieu \u00e0 statuer\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XIIIe CHAMBRE
\n no 262.014 du 17 janvier 2025
\n A. 232.951\/XIII-9187
\n En cause : B.A., ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Alain LEBRUN, avocat, place de la Libert\u00e9 6
\n 4030 Grivegn\u00e9e, contre :
\n la commune de Fl\u00e9malle, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son coll\u00e8ge communal.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 17 f\u00e9vrier 2021, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de la d\u00e9cision du 31 d\u00e9cembre 2020 par laquelle le coll\u00e8ge communal de Fl\u00e9malle d\u00e9livre \u00e0 G. E. un permis d\u2019urbanisme pour la pose d\u2019une palissade en b\u00e9ton sur un bien sis rue Tavalle 144 \u00e0 Fl\u00e9malle.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Le dossier administratif a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9.
\n Un m\u00e9moire ampliatif a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9.
\n Mme Isabelle Leysen, premier auditeur chef de section au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 un rapport sur la base de l\u2019article 12 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Le rapport a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie adverse le 27 mai 2024.
\n Isabelle Leysen, premier auditeur chef de section au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note le 4 juillet 2024 demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 14quinquies de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 du R\u00e9gent du 23 ao\u00fbt 1948
\n XIII – 9187 – 1\/3
\n d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure devant la section du contentieux administratif du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat.
\n Par une lettre du 9 juillet 2024, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie adverse que la chambre allait statuer sur l\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande, dans un d\u00e9lai de quinze jours, \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Perte d\u2019objet du recours
\n L\u2019article 30 des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose, en son paragraphe 3, que la section du contentieux administratif peut annuler l\u2019acte ou le r\u00e8glement si la partie adverse ou celui qui a int\u00e9r\u00eat au r\u00e8glement du litige n\u2019introduit aucune demande de poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure dans un d\u00e9lai de trente jours \u00e0 compter de la notification d\u2019un rapport concluant \u00e0 l\u2019annulation.
\n La partie adverse n\u2019a pas sollicit\u00e9 la poursuite de la proc\u00e9dure et aucune des parties n\u2019a souhait\u00e9 \u00eatre entendue.
\n L\u2019auditeur rapporteur a en cons\u00e9quence demand\u00e9 la mise en \u0153uvre de l\u2019article 14quinquies du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure. L\u2019\u00e9crit d\u00e9pos\u00e9 ult\u00e9rieurement par la partie requ\u00e9rante est \u00e9cart\u00e9 des d\u00e9bats n\u2019\u00e9tant pas pr\u00e9vu par le r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Toutefois, par une d\u00e9cision du 7 juin 2024, le coll\u00e8ge communal de Fl\u00e9malle a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de retirer le permis attaqu\u00e9. Cette d\u00e9cision de retrait a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9e au b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire du permis retir\u00e9 par un courrier du 11 juin 2024 et n\u2019a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019aucun recours dans le d\u00e9lai imparti, de sorte que le retrait est devenu d\u00e9finitif.
\n Cette circonstance prive le recours de son objet. Il n\u2019y a, en cons\u00e9quence, plus lieu de statuer.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.
\n XIII – 9187 – 2\/3
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer.
\n Article 2.
\n Une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros est accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante, \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse.
\n La contribution pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l\u2019article 66, 6o, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure, liquid\u00e9e \u00e0 la somme de 20 euros, est mise \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse.
\n Les autres d\u00e9pens, liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 la somme de 200 euros, sont mis \u00e0 la charge de la partie adverse.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 17 janvier 2025, par la XIIIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019Etat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Colette Debroux, pr\u00e9sident de chambre, C\u00e9line Morel, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n C\u00e9line Morel Colette Debroux
\n XIII – 9187 – 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 17 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 No R\u00f4le: A. 232951\/XIII-9187 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262014 – Permis d’urbanisme et permis mixtes – 17\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2025-01-21 Consultations: 75 – derni\u00e8re vue…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[159736],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[16586,7735,17415,8460,95855],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1218177","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2025arr-262-014","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-janvier","kji_keyword-permis","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 17 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 No R\u00f4le: A. 232951\/XIII-9187 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262014 - Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes - 17\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-21 Consultations: 75 - derni\u00e8re vue...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T20:50:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 17 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 No R\u00f4le: A. 232951\/XIII-9187 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262014 - Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes - 17\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-21 Consultations: 75 - derni\u00e8re vue...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-29T20:50:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-014\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1218177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1218177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1218177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1218177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1218177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1218177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1218177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1218177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}