{"id":1219010,"date":"2026-06-30T02:15:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:15:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:15:22","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 106 DU 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010<\/p>\n

ABDOU AZIZ NDAO C \/ IBRAHIMA NDIAYE<\/p>\n

COMP\u00c9TENCE – JUGE DE FONDS – ACTE ADMINISTRATIF – APPR\u00c9CIATION ET INTERPR\u00c9TATION<\/p>\n

Viole les dispositions de l\u2019article 4 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 02 f\u00e9vrier 1984 fixant l\u2019organisation judicaire, une Cour d\u2019appel qui retient qu\u2019il ne lui revient pas d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure de d\u00e9saffectation ou la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des actes administratifs alors que les juridictions du fond ont, au cours des instances dont elles sont saisies, comp\u00e9tence pour interpr\u00e9ter et appr\u00e9- cier la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions des diverses autorit\u00e9s administratives.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi.<\/p>\n

Attendu que par l\u2019arr\u00eat partiellement infirmatif d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 Ab- dou Aziz Ndao de sa demande d\u2019expulsion d\u2019Ibrahima Ndiaye de la parcelle n\u00b0 12 L du plan de lotissement de Saly Carrefour ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen, en sa premi\u00e8re branche, tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 4 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 02 f\u00e9vrier 1984 fixant l\u2019organisation judiciaire et du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 64-573 du 30 juil- let 1964 fixant les conditions d\u2019application de la loi n\u00b0 64-46 du 17 juin 1964 relative au do- maine national, en ce que la Cour d\u2019appel a retenu \u00ab qu\u2019il ne revient pas \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure de d\u00e9saffectation ou de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des actes administratifs en cau- se ; qu\u2019elle constate simplement que pour justifier son occupation, l\u2019appelant exhibe un acte administratif portant attribution de la parcelle \u00e0 sa fille et post\u00e9rieur \u00e0 celui invoqu\u00e9 par l\u2019intim\u00e9 \u00bb, alors que, selon les textes vis\u00e9s au moyen, la Cour d\u2019appel a effectivement comp\u00e9- tence pour appr\u00e9cier et interpr\u00e9ter la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de l\u2019acte de r\u00e9affectation de la parcelle litigieuse ;<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019article 4 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 02 f\u00e9vrier 1984 fixant l\u2019organisation judiciaire ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que pour d\u00e9bouter Abdou Aziz Ndao de sa demande d\u2019expulsion, la Cour d\u2019appel a retenu \u00ab qu\u2019il ne revient pas \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure de d\u00e9saffecta- tion ou de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des actes administratifs en cause ; qu\u2019elle constate simplement que pour justifier son occupation, l\u2019appelant exhibe un acte administratif portant attribution de la parcel- le \u00e0 sa fille et post\u00e9rieur \u00e0 celui invoqu\u00e9 par l\u2019intim\u00e9 \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, alors que, selon le texte susvis\u00e9, les juridictions de fond ont, au cours des instances dont elles sont saisies, comp\u00e9tence pour interpr\u00e9ter et appr\u00e9cier la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des d\u00e9ci- sions des diverses autorit\u00e9s administratives, la Cour d\u2019appel a m\u00e9connu le sens et la port\u00e9e dudit texte ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS<\/p>\n

Et sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de statuer sur les autres branches du premier moyen et sur les au- tres moyens :<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

126 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n

Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 277 rendu le 10 avril 2008 par la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Remet, en cons\u00e9quence, la cause et les parties au m\u00eame et semblable \u00e9tat o\u00f9 elles \u00e9taient avant ledit arr\u00eat et, pour \u00eatre fait droit, les renvoie devant la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar autrement compo- s\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Condamne Ibrahima Ndiaye aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar, en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audien- ce publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Mouhamadou DIAWARA ; CONSEILLERS : Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Jean Louis Paul TOUPANE, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9, Mouhamadou Bachir S\u00c8YE ; RAPPOR- TEUR : Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9 ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; AVOCAT : Ma\u00ee- tres GENI, SANKAL\u00c9 ET K\u00c9B\u00c9 ; GREFFIER : Ma\u00eetre Macodou NDIAYE.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre civile et commerciale 127<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 106 DU 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 ABDOU AZIZ NDAO C \/ IBRAHIMA NDIAYE COMP\u00c9TENCE – JUGE DE FONDS – ACTE ADMINISTRATIF – APPR\u00c9CIATION ET INTERPR\u00c9TATION Viole les dispositions de l\u2019article 4 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 02 f\u00e9vrier 1984 fixant l\u2019organisation judicaire, une Cour d\u2019appel qui retient qu\u2019il ne lui revient pas d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8464,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219010","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 106 DU 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 ABDOU AZIZ NDAO C \/ IBRAHIMA NDIAYE COMP\u00c9TENCE - JUGE DE FONDS - ACTE ADMINISTRATIF - APPR\u00c9CIATION ET INTERPR\u00c9TATION Viole les dispositions de l\u2019article 4 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 02 f\u00e9vrier 1984 fixant l\u2019organisation judicaire, une Cour d\u2019appel qui retient qu\u2019il ne lui revient pas d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:15:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 106 DU 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 ABDOU AZIZ NDAO C \/ IBRAHIMA NDIAYE COMP\u00c9TENCE - JUGE DE FONDS - ACTE ADMINISTRATIF - APPR\u00c9CIATION ET INTERPR\u00c9TATION Viole les dispositions de l\u2019article 4 de la loi n\u00b0 84-19 du 02 f\u00e9vrier 1984 fixant l\u2019organisation judicaire, une Cour d\u2019appel qui retient qu\u2019il ne lui revient pas d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:15:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-106-du-16-decembre-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 106 du 16 D\u00c9CEMBRE 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219010"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219010"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219010"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219010"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219010"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219010"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}