{"id":1219045,"date":"2026-06-30T02:18:36","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:18:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:18:36","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:18:36","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 96 DU 03 JUIN 2010<\/p>\n

ALIOU SALL C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC<\/p>\n

JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS – JURIDICTION DE JUGEMENT – SAISINE IN REM – EFFETS – D\u00c9TERMINATION<\/p>\n

\u00ab Les incriminations et les textes, initialement retenus comme base de la poursuite, ne lient pas la juridiction de jugement en vertu du principe de la saisine in rem \u00bb.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 92-25 du 30 mai 1992 sur la Cour de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 08 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon les \u00e9nonciations de l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que le demandeur a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9clar\u00e9 coupable des chefs d\u2019association de malfaiteurs, vols commis la nuit, avec port d\u2019armes v\u00e9ritables, usage d\u2019armes et de violences et condamn\u00e9 \u00e0 la peine des travaux forc\u00e9s \u00e0 perp\u00e9tuit\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique, tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 366 du code p\u00e9nal en ce que, pour condamner Aliou Sall aux travaux forc\u00e9s \u00e0 perp\u00e9tuit\u00e9, la Cour d\u2019assises a appliqu\u00e9 l\u2019article 367 du m\u00eame code, alors que l\u2019arr\u00eat de la chambre d\u2019accusation n\u2019a renvoy\u00e9 l\u2019accus\u00e9 devant la dite Cour que pour des faits pr\u00e9vus et punis par les articles 238, 239, 364, 366, 430, 370 et 138 du code p\u00e9nal ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que les incriminations et les textes retenus, soit comme base d\u2019une poursuite p\u00e9- nale, soit par une ordonnance ou un arr\u00eat de renvoi devant une juridiction de jugement, ne lient pas celle-ci en vertu du principe de la saisine \u00ab in rem \u00bb ; qu\u2019en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il r\u00e9sulte des mentions de l\u2019arr\u00eat que le demandeur est accus\u00e9 d\u2019association de malfaiteurs, vol en r\u00e9union avec usage de violences et d\u2019armes ; qu\u2019enfin, la Cour d\u2019assises, qui a r\u00e9pondu affirmativement aux ques- tions sur la culpabilit\u00e9 du chef de vol et sur la circonstance aggravante d\u2019usage d\u2019armes pr\u00e9vue par l\u2019article 367 du code p\u00e9nal et appliqu\u00e9 la peine pr\u00e9vue par ce texte cit\u00e9 et reproduit, a l\u00e9ga- lement justifi\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que le moyen doit \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par Aliou Sall contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 27 rendu le 28 juillet 2008 par la Cour d\u2019assises de Kaolack ;<\/p>\n

Le condamne aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019assises de Kaolack en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 51<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jours, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT RAPPORTEUR : Mamadou Badio CAMARA ; CONSEILLERS : Lassana Diab\u00e9 SIBY, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9, Mama KONAT\u00c9 ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; AVOCAT : Ma\u00eetre Amadou SOW ; GREFFIER : Ma\u00eetre Ibrahima SOW.<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

52 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 96 DU 03 JUIN 2010 ALIOU SALL C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS – JURIDICTION DE JUGEMENT – SAISINE IN REM – EFFETS – D\u00c9TERMINATION \u00ab Les incriminations et les textes, initialement retenus comme base de la poursuite, ne lient pas la juridiction de jugement en vertu du principe de la saisine in rem \u00bb. LA COUR,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219045","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 96 DU 03 JUIN 2010 ALIOU SALL C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS - JURIDICTION DE JUGEMENT - SAISINE IN REM - EFFETS - D\u00c9TERMINATION \u00ab Les incriminations et les textes, initialement retenus comme base de la poursuite, ne lient pas la juridiction de jugement en vertu du principe de la saisine in rem \u00bb. LA COUR,...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:18:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 96 DU 03 JUIN 2010 ALIOU SALL C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC JUGEMENTS ET ARR\u00caTS - JURIDICTION DE JUGEMENT - SAISINE IN REM - EFFETS - D\u00c9TERMINATION \u00ab Les incriminations et les textes, initialement retenus comme base de la poursuite, ne lient pas la juridiction de jugement en vertu du principe de la saisine in rem \u00bb. LA COUR,...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:18:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-96-du-03-juin-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 96 du 03 JUIN 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219045"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219045"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219045"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219045"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219045"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219045"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}