{"id":1219048,"date":"2026-06-30T02:18:55","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:18:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:18:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:18:55","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 95 DU 20 MAI 2010<\/p>\n

LIMA GOMIS C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC H\u00c9RITIERS DE KHADIM KA<\/p>\n

COUR D\u2019ASSISES – AUDIENCE – ACCOMPLISSEMENT FORMALIT\u00c9S DE LA LECTURE DES TEXTES APPLIQU\u00c9S – JUSTIFICATION – MENTION DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT – OUI COUR D\u2019ASSISES – \u00c9TABLISSEMENT DU PROC\u00c8S-VERBAL CONSTATANT L\u2019ACCOMPLISSEMENT DES FORMALIT\u00c9S PROC\u00c9DURALES – D\u00c9FAUT – SANC- TION – INEXISTENCE COUR D\u2019ASSISES – ARR\u00caT – OBLIGATION DE MOTIVATION – \u00c9TENDUE – D\u00c9- TERMINATION<\/p>\n

\u00ab La justification de l\u2019accomplissement de la formalit\u00e9 de lecture, \u00e0 l\u2019audience, des textes ap- pliqu\u00e9s par une Cour d\u2019assises, peut \u00eatre d\u00e9duite des mentions de l\u2019arr\u00eat qui font foi jusqu\u2019\u00e0 inscription de faux. Les arr\u00eats de la Cour d\u2019assises ne sont motiv\u00e9s que par r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la d\u00e9claration de culpabilit\u00e9 et la r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la question pos\u00e9e \u00e0 cet effet est souveraine. Doit par cons\u00e9quent, \u00eatre d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable, le moyen qui, sous le couvert d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale, ne tend qu\u2019\u00e0 remettre en discussion la r\u00e9ponse de la Cour sur la culpabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019accus\u00e9. L\u2019article 352 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, qui pr\u00e9voit l\u2019\u00e9tablissement d\u2019un proc\u00e8s-verbal cons- tatant l\u2019accomplissement des formalit\u00e9s prescrites, n\u2019attache aucune sanction \u00e0 l\u2019inobservation des dispositions y contenues, sauf au demandeur \u00e0 justifier d\u2019une atteinte \u00e0 ses droits \u00bb.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 92-25 du 30 mai 1992 sur la Cour de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 08 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen, tir\u00e9 d\u2019une violation de l\u2019article 340 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, en ce que le Pr\u00e9sident de la Cour d\u2019assises n\u2019a pas lu \u00e0 l\u2019audience les textes de loi dont il est fait ap- plication ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte des mentions de l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, qui font foi jusqu\u2019\u00e0 inscription de faux, que \u00ab les faits d\u00e9clar\u00e9s constants par la Cour d\u2019assises sont pr\u00e9vus et punis par les articles 364, 366, 367, 238 et 239 du code p\u00e9nal dont la lecture a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite par Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident et qui sont ainsi libell\u00e9s\u2026 \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que le moyen, qui manque en fait, doit \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le deuxi\u00e8me moyen, tir\u00e9 d\u2019une violation de l\u2019article 352 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, en ce que le proc\u00e8s verbal constatant l\u2019accomplissement des formalit\u00e9s prescrites n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 dress\u00e9 et sign\u00e9 dans les trois jours impos\u00e9s par le texte pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que, d\u2019une part, l\u2019article invoqu\u00e9 n\u2019attache aucune sanction \u00e0 l\u2019inobservation de la formalit\u00e9 qu\u2019il prescrit et, d\u2019autre part, le demandeur ne justifie d\u2019aucune violation de ses droits ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 49<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que le moyen est mal fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le troisi\u00e8me moyen, pris d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale, en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a appliqu\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re injustifi\u00e9e l\u2019article 367 du code p\u00e9nal, en consid\u00e9rant que le seul coup de couteau re\u00e7u par la victime Khadim Ka lui a \u00e9t\u00e9 donn\u00e9 par Lima Gomis, ce qui est hasardeux d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019il y avait deux mis en cause et que le seul t\u00e9moin oculaire des faits a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 qu\u2019il ne sait pas lequel des deux accus\u00e9s a donn\u00e9 le coup mortel ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que les arr\u00eats de Cours d\u2019assises ne sont motiv\u00e9s que par r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la d\u00e9clara- tion de culpabilit\u00e9 qui r\u00e9pond par oui ou non aux questions r\u00e9dig\u00e9es par le Pr\u00e9sident, la r\u00e9ponse \u00e9tant souveraine ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que le moyen est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par Lima Gomis contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 02 rendu le 22 juillet 2008 par la Cour d\u2019assises si\u00e9geant \u00e0 Thi\u00e8s ;<\/p>\n

Le condamne aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019assises si\u00e9geant \u00e0 Thi\u00e8s en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jours, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT RAPPORTEUR : Mamadou Badio CAMARA ; CONSEILLERS : Lassana Diab\u00e9 SIBY, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9, Mama KONAT\u00c9 ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; AVOCAT : Ma\u00eetres Babacar CAMARA et Khoureychi BA ; GREFFIER : Ma\u00eetre Ibrahima SOW.<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

50 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 95 DU 20 MAI 2010 LIMA GOMIS C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC H\u00c9RITIERS DE KHADIM KA COUR D\u2019ASSISES – AUDIENCE – ACCOMPLISSEMENT FORMALIT\u00c9S DE LA LECTURE DES TEXTES APPLIQU\u00c9S – JUSTIFICATION – MENTION DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT – OUI COUR D\u2019ASSISES – \u00c9TABLISSEMENT DU PROC\u00c8S-VERBAL CONSTATANT L\u2019ACCOMPLISSEMENT DES FORMALIT\u00c9S PROC\u00c9DURALES – D\u00c9FAUT – SANC- TION – INEXISTENCE COUR D\u2019ASSISES – ARR\u00caT…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219048","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 95 DU 20 MAI 2010 LIMA GOMIS C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC H\u00c9RITIERS DE KHADIM KA COUR D\u2019ASSISES - AUDIENCE - ACCOMPLISSEMENT FORMALIT\u00c9S DE LA LECTURE DES TEXTES APPLIQU\u00c9S - JUSTIFICATION - MENTION DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT - OUI COUR D\u2019ASSISES - \u00c9TABLISSEMENT DU PROC\u00c8S-VERBAL CONSTATANT L\u2019ACCOMPLISSEMENT DES FORMALIT\u00c9S PROC\u00c9DURALES - D\u00c9FAUT - SANC- TION - INEXISTENCE COUR D\u2019ASSISES - ARR\u00caT...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:18:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 95 DU 20 MAI 2010 LIMA GOMIS C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC H\u00c9RITIERS DE KHADIM KA COUR D\u2019ASSISES - AUDIENCE - ACCOMPLISSEMENT FORMALIT\u00c9S DE LA LECTURE DES TEXTES APPLIQU\u00c9S - JUSTIFICATION - MENTION DE L\u2019ARR\u00caT - OUI COUR D\u2019ASSISES - \u00c9TABLISSEMENT DU PROC\u00c8S-VERBAL CONSTATANT L\u2019ACCOMPLISSEMENT DES FORMALIT\u00c9S PROC\u00c9DURALES - D\u00c9FAUT - SANC- TION - INEXISTENCE COUR D\u2019ASSISES - ARR\u00caT...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:18:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-95-du-20-mai-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 95 du 20 MAI 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}