{"id":1219052,"date":"2026-06-30T02:19:19","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:19:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:19:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:19:19","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 89 DU 20 MAI 2010<\/p>\n

\u00c9TAT DU S\u00c9N\u00c9GAL C \/ ABDOU KARIM GU\u00c9YE<\/p>\n

DENIERS PUBLICS – MANDAT DE D\u00c9P\u00d4T – MAIN LEV\u00c9E – CONDITION – CAU- TIONNEMENT – OFFRE DE GARANTIE D\u2019UN IMMEUBLE – EXCLUSION (NON)<\/p>\n

\u00ab Encourt la cassation, pour violation de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une chambre d\u2019accusation ordonnant la mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire d\u2019une personne poursuivie par application des articles 152 \u00e0 155 du code p\u00e9nal, sur le fondement d\u2019une offre de garantie d\u2019immeuble en lieu et place d\u2019un cautionnement effectif mat\u00e9rialis\u00e9 par la remise des titres de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 et l\u2019inscription de la garantie au livre foncier \u00bb.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 08 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique, en sa seconde branche tir\u00e9e d\u2019une violation de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, en ce que la chambre d\u2019accusation a ordonn\u00e9 la mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire d\u2019une personne poursuivie sur la base des articles 152 et suivants du code p\u00e9nal, au motif qu\u2019en offrant des immeubles en garantie, l\u2019inculp\u00e9 a \u00ab satisfait aux conditions de l\u2019article 140 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, notamment celle li\u00e9e au cautionnement \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019aux termes de ce texte, \u00ab \u00c0 l\u2019encontre des personnes poursuivies par application des articles 152 \u00e0 155 du code p\u00e9nal, le juge d\u2019instruction d\u00e9livre obligatoirement : 1\u00b0) mandat d\u2019arr\u00eat si l\u2019inculp\u00e9 est en fuite ; 2\u00b0) mandat de d\u00e9p\u00f4t, lorsque le montant du manquant initial est \u00e9gal ou sup\u00e9rieur \u00e0 1 000 000 de francs et ne fait pas l\u2019objet d\u2019un remboursement ou du cautionnement de son int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 ou d\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse. Dans les cas ci-dessus o\u00f9 les mandats d\u2019arr\u00eat ou de d\u00e9p\u00f4t sont obligatoires, il ne peut en \u00eatre donn\u00e9 mainlev\u00e9e que si au cours de l\u2019information surviennent des contestations s\u00e9rieuses ou le remboursement ou le cautionnement de l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 du manquant. Il n\u2019y a d\u2019exception aux dispositions des deux premiers alin\u00e9as que si, selon le rapport d\u2019un m\u00e9- decin commis en qualit\u00e9 d\u2019expert, l\u2019\u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 du d\u00e9tenu est incompatible avec le maintien en d\u00e9tention, m\u00eame dans un centre hospitalier \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que pour infirmer l\u2019ordonnance entreprise et ordonner la mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire de Abdou Karim Gu\u00e9ye, poursuivi par application des articles 152 et suivants du code p\u00e9nal, la chambre d\u2019accusation retient, \u00e0 la suite d\u2019une expertise qu\u2019elle a ordonn\u00e9e, que \u00ab l\u2019inculp\u00e9 a offert en garantie de la pr\u00e9servation des droits de la partie civile des immeubles dont la valeur v\u00e9nale couvre largement les sommes dont le d\u00e9tournement lui est reproch\u00e9\u2026 ; qu\u2019il a satisfait aux conditions de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, notamment celle li\u00e9e au caution- nement\u2026 \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 33<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, alors que l\u2019inculp\u00e9 n\u2019a fait qu\u2019une offre de garantie d\u2019immeubles en lieu et place d\u2019un cautionnement effectif mat\u00e9rialis\u00e9 par la remise des titres de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 et l\u2019inscription de la garantie au livre foncier, la chambre d\u2019accusation a viol\u00e9 l\u2019article 140 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que la cassation est encourue ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS,<\/p>\n

Sans qu\u2019il soit besoin d\u2019examiner la premi\u00e8re branche du moyen,<\/p>\n

Casse et annule en toutes ses dispositions l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 35 rendu le 02 mars 2010 par la chambre d\u2019accusation de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne le renvoi de la proc\u00e9dure devant le doyen des juges d\u2019instruction du tribunal r\u00e9gional hors classe de Dakar, pour continuation de l\u2019information ;<\/p>\n

Met les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du tr\u00e9sor public ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jours, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT RAPPORTEUR : Mamadou Badio CAMARA ; CONSEILLERS : Lassana Diab\u00e9 SIBY, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9, Mama KONAT\u00c9 ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; GREFFIER : Ma\u00eetre Ibrahima SOW.<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

34 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 89 DU 20 MAI 2010 \u00c9TAT DU S\u00c9N\u00c9GAL C \/ ABDOU KARIM GU\u00c9YE DENIERS PUBLICS – MANDAT DE D\u00c9P\u00d4T – MAIN LEV\u00c9E – CONDITION – CAU- TIONNEMENT – OFFRE DE GARANTIE D\u2019UN IMMEUBLE – EXCLUSION (NON) \u00ab Encourt la cassation, pour violation de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une chambre d\u2019accusation ordonnant la mise en…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219052","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 89 DU 20 MAI 2010 \u00c9TAT DU S\u00c9N\u00c9GAL C \/ ABDOU KARIM GU\u00c9YE DENIERS PUBLICS - MANDAT DE D\u00c9P\u00d4T - MAIN LEV\u00c9E - CONDITION - CAU- TIONNEMENT - OFFRE DE GARANTIE D\u2019UN IMMEUBLE - EXCLUSION (NON) \u00ab Encourt la cassation, pour violation de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une chambre d\u2019accusation ordonnant la mise en...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:19:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 89 DU 20 MAI 2010 \u00c9TAT DU S\u00c9N\u00c9GAL C \/ ABDOU KARIM GU\u00c9YE DENIERS PUBLICS - MANDAT DE D\u00c9P\u00d4T - MAIN LEV\u00c9E - CONDITION - CAU- TIONNEMENT - OFFRE DE GARANTIE D\u2019UN IMMEUBLE - EXCLUSION (NON) \u00ab Encourt la cassation, pour violation de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une chambre d\u2019accusation ordonnant la mise en...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:19:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-89-du-20-mai-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 89 du 20 MAI 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219052"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219052"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219052"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219052"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219052"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219052"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}