{"id":1219057,"date":"2026-06-30T02:19:41","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:19:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:19:41","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:19:41","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 83 DU 06 MAI 2010<\/p>\n

MAKHA BA SODATRA S.A. C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC \u00c9TS TSHIAMA ET FILS<\/p>\n

ACTION PUBLIQUE – PRESCRIPTION – D\u00c9LAI – POINT DE D\u00c9PART – ACTE IN- TERRUPTIF R\u00c9ALIS\u00c9 \u00c0 L\u2019\u00c9TRANGER – EFFETS – D\u00c9TERMINATION<\/p>\n

\u00ab Encourt la cassation l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une Cour d\u2019appel qui a \u00e9cart\u00e9 une exception de prescription de l\u2019action publique au motif qu\u2019il ne peut \u00eatre tenu compte de d\u00e9cisions rendues \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019en mati\u00e8re d\u2019abus de confiance, le d\u00e9lai de prescription court du jour o\u00f9 le d\u00e9lit est ap- paru et a pu \u00eatre constat\u00e9 dans des conditions permettant l\u2019exercice de l\u2019action publique \u00bb.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 08 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen, en sa quatri\u00e8me branche tir\u00e9e de la violation des articles 7 et 8 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat a infirm\u00e9 sur la prescription de l\u2019action publique sans prendre en consid\u00e9ration la mise en demeure faite par le biais de l\u2019assignation en date du 4 juillet 2002 qui a saisi le tribunal de Boma ainsi que les commandements de payer des 29 octo- bre et 27 d\u00e9cembre 2002 et les actes relatifs \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019exequatur alors que, selon le moyen, en mati\u00e8re d\u2019abus de confiance, la prescription de l\u2019action publique court \u00e0 compter de la mise en demeure qui est l\u2019acte \u00e0 partir duquel la partie civile a eu connaissance du fait d\u00e9lic- tueux ;<\/p>\n

Vu les articles 7 et 8 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon ces textes, qu\u2019en mati\u00e8re de d\u00e9lit, la prescription de l\u2019action publique est de trois ann\u00e9es r\u00e9volues \u00e0 compter du jour de la commission si, dans cet intervalle, il n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait aucun acte d\u2019instruction ou de poursuite ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que pour \u00e9carter l\u2019exception de prescription de l\u2019action publique, l\u2019arr\u00eat retient \u00ab qu\u2019il ne peut \u00eatre tenu compte du jugement rendu le 7 octobre 2002 \u00e0 Boma (R\u00e9publique d\u00e9mocrati- que du Congo) qui n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 ex\u00e9quatur\u00e9 ni des commandements de payer des 29 octobre et 27 d\u00e9cembre 2002 servis par un huissier de justice congolais, ni des ordonnances de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 ren- dues \u00e0 Dakar en 2003 et 2004 rejetant les demandes d\u2019exequatur puisqu\u2019il s\u2019agit d\u2019actes subs\u00e9- quents au jugement de Boma et se rattachant \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e0 laquelle la partie civile a valablement renonc\u00e9 ; que c\u2019est le 18 avril 2007, par exploit d\u2019un huissier de justice s\u00e9n\u00e9galais, que les \u00e9tablissements Tshiama et fils ont affirm\u00e9 leur volont\u00e9 de voir leur cocontractant ex\u00e9cu- ter son obligation, en le mettant en demeure de repr\u00e9senter la marchandise et que la r\u00e9union de tous les \u00e9l\u00e9ments du d\u00e9lit ne s\u2019est op\u00e9r\u00e9e qu\u2019\u00e0 partir de cette sommation \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en se d\u00e9terminant ainsi, alors qu\u2019en mati\u00e8re d\u2019abus de confiance, le d\u00e9lai de pres- cription court du jour o\u00f9 le d\u00e9lit est apparu et a pu \u00eatre constat\u00e9 dans des conditions permettant l\u2019exercice de l\u2019action publique et, qu\u2019en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, pour avoir obtenu, m\u00eame \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger, un ju-<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 27<\/p>\n

gement du 7 octobre 2002, les d\u00e9fendeurs ont pu constater la commission des faits au moins \u00e0 cette date, la Cour d\u2019appel a m\u00e9connu le sens et la port\u00e9e des textes vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que la cassation est encourue ;<\/p>\n

Et, attendu qu\u2019en application de l\u2019article 52 de la loi organique susvis\u00e9e, la cassation n\u2019implique pas qu\u2019il soit statu\u00e9 \u00e0 nouveau d\u00e8s lors que la prescription triennale de l\u2019action publique est ac- quise entre les ann\u00e9es 2002 et 2007 ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS ;<\/p>\n

Sans qu\u2019il soit besoin d\u2019examiner les autres branches du premier moyen ni le second moyen ;<\/p>\n

Casse et annule en toutes ses dispositions l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 380 rendu le 18 mai 2009 par la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Dit que la prescription de l\u2019action publique est acquise ;<\/p>\n

En cons\u00e9quence, dit n\u2019y avoir lieu \u00e0 renvoi ;<\/p>\n

Met les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du Tr\u00e9sor public.<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jours, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Mamadou Badio CAMARA ; CONSEILLER RAPPORTEUR : Mama KO- NAT\u00c9 ; CONSEILLERS : Lassana Diab\u00e9 SIBY, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Ch\u00e9rif SOU- MAR\u00c9, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Souleymane KANE ; AVOCAT : Ma\u00eetres BA & TANDIAN ; GREFFIER : Ma\u00eetre Ibrahima SOW.<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

28 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 83 DU 06 MAI 2010 MAKHA BA SODATRA S.A. C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC \u00c9TS TSHIAMA ET FILS ACTION PUBLIQUE – PRESCRIPTION – D\u00c9LAI – POINT DE D\u00c9PART – ACTE IN- TERRUPTIF R\u00c9ALIS\u00c9 \u00c0 L\u2019\u00c9TRANGER – EFFETS – D\u00c9TERMINATION \u00ab Encourt la cassation l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une Cour d\u2019appel qui a \u00e9cart\u00e9 une exception de prescription de l\u2019action publique au motif…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219057","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 83 DU 06 MAI 2010 MAKHA BA SODATRA S.A. C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC \u00c9TS TSHIAMA ET FILS ACTION PUBLIQUE - PRESCRIPTION - D\u00c9LAI - POINT DE D\u00c9PART - ACTE IN- TERRUPTIF R\u00c9ALIS\u00c9 \u00c0 L\u2019\u00c9TRANGER - EFFETS - D\u00c9TERMINATION \u00ab Encourt la cassation l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une Cour d\u2019appel qui a \u00e9cart\u00e9 une exception de prescription de l\u2019action publique au motif...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:19:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 83 DU 06 MAI 2010 MAKHA BA SODATRA S.A. C \/ MINIST\u00c8RE PUBLIC \u00c9TS TSHIAMA ET FILS ACTION PUBLIQUE - PRESCRIPTION - D\u00c9LAI - POINT DE D\u00c9PART - ACTE IN- TERRUPTIF R\u00c9ALIS\u00c9 \u00c0 L\u2019\u00c9TRANGER - EFFETS - D\u00c9TERMINATION \u00ab Encourt la cassation l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019une Cour d\u2019appel qui a \u00e9cart\u00e9 une exception de prescription de l\u2019action publique au motif...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:19:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-83-du-06-mai-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 du 06 MAI 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219057"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219057"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219057"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219057"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219057"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219057"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}