{"id":1219065,"date":"2026-06-30T02:20:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:20:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:20:25","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:20:25","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 59 DU 04 MARS 2010<\/p>\n

FASSALY KON\u00c9 SERIGNE GAYE C \/ PAPE GORA THIAM<\/p>\n

POUVOIR DES JUGES – POUVOIR SOUVERAIN DES JUGES DU FOND – DOMMA- GES INT\u00c9R\u00caTS – FIXATION – PR\u00c9JUDICE – \u00c9VALUATION<\/p>\n

\u00ab Rel\u00e8vent de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond l\u2019\u00e9valuation du pr\u00e9judice subi par une victime d\u2019infraction et la fixation du montant des dommages int\u00e9r\u00eats \u00bb.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008-35 du 08 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte de l\u2019arr\u00eat confirmatif attaqu\u00e9 que suite \u00e0 des promesses de vente de ter- rains, Pape Gora Thiam a \u00e9t\u00e9 poursuivi des chefs d\u2019abus de confiance et d\u2019escroquerie, relax\u00e9 pour le premier d\u00e9lit, condamn\u00e9 pour le second \u00e0 six mois d\u2019emprisonnement avec sursis et \u00e0 payer aux parties civiles Serigne Gaye et Fassaly Kon\u00e9, respectivement les sommes de 4 500 000 francs CFA et 22 250 000 francs \u00e0 titre de dommage et int\u00e9r\u00eats ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 3 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u2019a pas pris en compte la r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale des pr\u00e9judices subis par les demandeurs \u00e0 savoir le manque \u00e0 gagner relatif \u00e0 la valeur des parcelles, dont l\u2019attribution \u00e9tait la contrepar- tie convenue des prestations qu\u2019ils ont fournies ; que la Cour d\u2019appel s\u2019est born\u00e9e \u00e0 condamner Pape Gora Thiam \u00e0 rembourser uniquement les sommes que les demandeurs lui ont remises au titre de la cession d\u2019autres parcelles, qu\u2019il n\u2019a pas honor\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Sur le second moyen tir\u00e9 de l\u2019insuffisance de motifs et de la contradiction de motifs en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat, pour rejeter la demande de r\u00e9paration de leur manque \u00e0 gagner sur les parcelles non livr\u00e9es, a adopt\u00e9 une motivation consistant, d\u2019une part, \u00e0 dire que les arguments des parties civi- les ne sont pas convaincants quant au d\u00e9faut de fondement de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du premier juge et, d\u2019autre part, \u00e0 remettre en cause le rapport d\u2019expertise quant \u00e0 la garantie d\u2019objectivit\u00e9 et du principe du contradictoire alors que, selon le moyen, la Cour d\u2019appel, qui n\u2019a pas remis en cause les chefs de pr\u00e9judice soulev\u00e9s par Gaye et Kon\u00e9 mais seulement la base de calcul de leur mon- tant, a admis le principe de la r\u00e9paration correspondant au manque \u00e0 gagner sur les parcelles concern\u00e9es, et par cons\u00e9quent devait d\u00e9cider de leur r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale ;<\/p>\n

Les deux moyens \u00e9tant r\u00e9unis ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que pour condamner Pape Gora Thiam au paiement de diverses sommes \u00e0 titre de remboursement et de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats, la Cour d\u2019appel a relev\u00e9 que le premier juge a pris en compte non seulement les montants remis par les parties civiles et non contest\u00e9s, mais \u00e9ga- lement le manque \u00e0 gagner et la privation de jouissance ; que le d\u00e9faut de fondement de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du premier juge n\u2019est pas soutenu par des arguments convaincants ; que le rapport d\u2019expertise ne pr\u00e9sente aucune objectivit\u00e9 ; que Gaye et Kon\u00e9 n\u2019ont pas \u00e9tabli avoir remis au pr\u00e9venu plus que les sommes respectives de 3 500 000 francs et 17 250 000 francs ;<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

20 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en d\u00e9duisant de ces constatations souveraines que le premier juge, apr\u00e8s avoir ca- ract\u00e9ris\u00e9 la faute du pr\u00e9venu, a convenablement statu\u00e9 sur les int\u00e9r\u00eats des plaignants, la Cour d\u2019appel a l\u00e9galement justifi\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

Rejette le pourvoi de Fassaly Kon\u00e9 et Serigne Gaye form\u00e9 contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 377 rendu le 15 mai 2009 par la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Les condamne aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jours, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Mamadou Badio CAMARA ; CONSEILLERS : Lassana Diab\u00e9 SIBY, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9 ; CONSEILLER RAPPORTEUR : Mama KO- NAT\u00c9 ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : El Hadji Lamine BOUSSO ; AVOCAT : Ma\u00eetre Gu\u00e9del NDIAYE ; GREFFIER : Ma\u00eetre Ibrahima SOW.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 21<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 59 DU 04 MARS 2010 FASSALY KON\u00c9 SERIGNE GAYE C \/ PAPE GORA THIAM POUVOIR DES JUGES – POUVOIR SOUVERAIN DES JUGES DU FOND – DOMMA- GES INT\u00c9R\u00caTS – FIXATION – PR\u00c9JUDICE – \u00c9VALUATION \u00ab Rel\u00e8vent de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond l\u2019\u00e9valuation du pr\u00e9judice subi par une victime d\u2019infraction et la fixation du montant des dommages…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219065","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 59 DU 04 MARS 2010 FASSALY KON\u00c9 SERIGNE GAYE C \/ PAPE GORA THIAM POUVOIR DES JUGES - POUVOIR SOUVERAIN DES JUGES DU FOND - DOMMA- GES INT\u00c9R\u00caTS - FIXATION - PR\u00c9JUDICE - \u00c9VALUATION \u00ab Rel\u00e8vent de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond l\u2019\u00e9valuation du pr\u00e9judice subi par une victime d\u2019infraction et la fixation du montant des dommages...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:20:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 59 DU 04 MARS 2010 FASSALY KON\u00c9 SERIGNE GAYE C \/ PAPE GORA THIAM POUVOIR DES JUGES - POUVOIR SOUVERAIN DES JUGES DU FOND - DOMMA- GES INT\u00c9R\u00caTS - FIXATION - PR\u00c9JUDICE - \u00c9VALUATION \u00ab Rel\u00e8vent de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond l\u2019\u00e9valuation du pr\u00e9judice subi par une victime d\u2019infraction et la fixation du montant des dommages...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:20:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-59-du-04-mars-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 59 du 04 MARS 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219065"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219065"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219065"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219065"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219065"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219065"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}