{"id":1219067,"date":"2026-06-30T02:20:36","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:20:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:20:36","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:20:36","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 44 DU 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010<\/p>\n

LE M\u00c9RIDIEN PR\u00c9SIDENT C \/ BILLIE MBAYE<\/p>\n

APPEL – PRINCIPE DU DOUBLE DEGR\u00c9 DE JURIDICTION – INTERDICTION DE- MANDE NOUVELLE – APPLICATION – DEMANDE FOND\u00c9E SUR L\u2019ARTICLE 457 ALIN\u00c9A 2 DU CPP – IRRECEVABILIT\u00c9 – CAS<\/p>\n

\u00ab En l\u2019absence d\u2019indication pr\u00e9cise de domicile r\u00e9el ou \u00e9lu, est recevable le pourvoi signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 parquet d\u00e8s lors que la d\u00e9fense a produit un m\u00e9moire, le principe de contradictoire \u00e9tant ainsi sauvegard\u00e9. Justifie sa d\u00e9cision, au regard de l\u2019article 503 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale selon lequel la par- tie civile, en cause d\u2019appel, ne peut former aucune demande nouvelle, une Cour d\u2019appel qui a jug\u00e9 qu\u2019une demande fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 457 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale et pr\u00e9sen- t\u00e9e pour la premi\u00e8re fois en appel, ne saurait \u00eatre accueillie en raison du principe du double degr\u00e9 de juridiction \u00bb.<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il ressort des \u00e9nonciations de l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 que la Cour d\u2019appel, saisie sur renvoi apr\u00e8s cassation, a confirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris en ce qu\u2019il a relax\u00e9 la pr\u00e9venue du chef d\u2019escroquerie et, infirmant sur les chefs de filouterie d\u2019aliments et d\u00e9tention d\u2019arme sans autori- sation administrative, renvoy\u00e9 Billie Mbaye des fins de la poursuite puis rejet\u00e9 la demande en paiement form\u00e9e sur la base de l\u2019article 457 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale par la partie civile ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la d\u00e9fenderesse a conclu \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi au motif que le recours de l\u2019h\u00f4tel M\u00e9ridien Pr\u00e9sident a \u00e9t\u00e9 signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 parquet en violation des dispositions de la loi organi- que sur la Cour supr\u00eame, dont l\u2019article 63 pr\u00e9voit que le recours en cassation, exerc\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re p\u00e9nale par la partie civile, doit \u00eatre signifi\u00e9 au d\u00e9fendeur en libert\u00e9 soit \u00e0 sa personne soit \u00e0 son domicile r\u00e9el ou \u00e9lu ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu qu\u2019en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 ne porte indication d\u2019aucun domicile r\u00e9el ou \u00e9lu de la d\u00e9fenderesse au pourvoi, laquelle a mentionn\u00e9, dans ses propres \u00e9critures, en guise d\u2019adresse,<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n\u00b0 2-3<\/p>\n

18 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n

qu\u2019elle est \u00ab de passage \u00e0 Dakar \u00bb ; que le principe du contradictoire \u00e9tant sauvegard\u00e9 d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019elle a produit un m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, le pourvoi doit \u00eatre re\u00e7u ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique tir\u00e9 de la violation des articles 457 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9- nale et 273 alin\u00e9a 3 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile en ce que la Cour d\u2019appel a rejet\u00e9, comme nouvelle, la demande en paiement pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e pour la premi\u00e8re fois en cause d\u2019appel sur le fon- dement de l\u2019article 457 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale alors que ladite demande n\u2019est que l\u2019accessoire de l\u2019action civile en r\u00e9paration form\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance devant la juridiction correctionnelle ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que la Cour d\u2019appel, qui a retenu que la demande, fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 457 alin\u00e9a 2 et pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e pour la premi\u00e8re fois en appel, ne saurait prosp\u00e9rer, eu \u00e9gard au principe du double degr\u00e9 de juridiction, a l\u00e9galement justifi\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision au regard des dispositions de l\u2019article 503 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale selon lesquelles la partie civile ne peut, en cause d\u2019appel, former aucune demande nouvelle ;<\/p>\n

Et attendu que l\u2019article 273 alin\u00e9a 3 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui n\u2019est pas applicable aux instances p\u00e9nales, n\u2019a pu \u00eatre viol\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par l\u2019h\u00f4tel M\u00e9ridien Pr\u00e9sident contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 286 rendu le 03 avril 2009 par la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Condamne le demandeur aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e8s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jours, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Mamadou B.CAMARA ; CONSEILLERS : Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Bara NIANG, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9, Mama KONAT\u00c9 ; RAPPORTEUR : Cheikh Tidiane Couli- baly, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Lamine BOUSSO ; AVOCAT : Gu\u00e9del NDIAYE ; GREF- FIER : Ibrahima Sow.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 19<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 44 DU 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 LE M\u00c9RIDIEN PR\u00c9SIDENT C \/ BILLIE MBAYE APPEL – PRINCIPE DU DOUBLE DEGR\u00c9 DE JURIDICTION – INTERDICTION DE- MANDE NOUVELLE – APPLICATION – DEMANDE FOND\u00c9E SUR L\u2019ARTICLE 457 ALIN\u00c9A 2 DU CPP – IRRECEVABILIT\u00c9 – CAS \u00ab En l\u2019absence d\u2019indication pr\u00e9cise de domicile r\u00e9el ou \u00e9lu, est recevable le pourvoi signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 parquet…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135559],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8457,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219067","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135559","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 44 DU 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 LE M\u00c9RIDIEN PR\u00c9SIDENT C \/ BILLIE MBAYE APPEL - PRINCIPE DU DOUBLE DEGR\u00c9 DE JURIDICTION - INTERDICTION DE- MANDE NOUVELLE - APPLICATION - DEMANDE FOND\u00c9E SUR L\u2019ARTICLE 457 ALIN\u00c9A 2 DU CPP - IRRECEVABILIT\u00c9 - CAS \u00ab En l\u2019absence d\u2019indication pr\u00e9cise de domicile r\u00e9el ou \u00e9lu, est recevable le pourvoi signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 parquet...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:20:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010","og_description":"ARR\u00caT n\u00b0 44 DU 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 LE M\u00c9RIDIEN PR\u00c9SIDENT C \/ BILLIE MBAYE APPEL - PRINCIPE DU DOUBLE DEGR\u00c9 DE JURIDICTION - INTERDICTION DE- MANDE NOUVELLE - APPLICATION - DEMANDE FOND\u00c9E SUR L\u2019ARTICLE 457 ALIN\u00c9A 2 DU CPP - IRRECEVABILIT\u00c9 - CAS \u00ab En l\u2019absence d\u2019indication pr\u00e9cise de domicile r\u00e9el ou \u00e9lu, est recevable le pourvoi signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 parquet...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:20:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-44-du-18-fevrier-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 44 du 18 F\u00c9VRIER 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}