{"id":1219078,"date":"2026-06-30T02:21:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:21:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T02:21:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T00:21:28","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009<\/p>\n

LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 :<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent Judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat conclut \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Mamadou Seck pour nullit\u00e9 de la signification servie au Ministre charg\u00e9 de la Fonction publique ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que, certes, aux termes de l\u2019article 39 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure civile, l\u2019\u00c9tat est assign\u00e9 en la personne de l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat ;<\/p>\n

Que, cependant, bien que le recours ait \u00e9t\u00e9, en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, irr\u00e9guli\u00e8rement signifi\u00e9 au Ministre charg\u00e9 de la Fonction publique, l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 un m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense au nom de l\u2019\u00c9tat, dans les forme et d\u00e9lai pr\u00e9vus par la loi ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019ainsi la signification servie ayant rempli son objet, l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat qui n\u2019invoque aucun pr\u00e9judice de ce chef, est mal fond\u00e9 \u00e0 solliciter l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours ;<\/p>\n

AU FOND :<\/p>\n

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE TIR\u00c9 DE LA VIOLATION DE LA LOI N\u00b0 61-33 PORTANT STATUT DES FONCTIONNAIRES, ET DE LA LOI N\u00b0 81-52 DU 10 JUILLET 1981 PORTANT CODE DES PENSIONS CIVILES ET MILITAIRES DE RETRAITE :<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que Mamadou Seck, greffier pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment greffier en chef int\u00e9rimaire au tribunal d\u00e9partemental de Lingu\u00e8re, reproche au Ministre de la Fonction publique d\u2019avoir refus\u00e9 de lui faire b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier d\u2019une d\u00e9cision r\u00e9troactive de maintien en activit\u00e9, au motif qu\u2019aucune<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre administrative 143<\/p>\n

prolongation n\u2019est pr\u00e9vue par la loi pour les greffiers, alors qu\u2019ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 admis \u00e0 faire valoir ses droits \u00e0 une pension de retraite depuis le 1er juin 2007, il n\u2019en a re\u00e7u notification que le 06 f\u00e9vrier 2008 et n\u2019a effectivement cess\u00e9 ses activit\u00e9s que le 12 mars 2008 ;<\/p>\n

Mais consid\u00e9rant que le requ\u00e9rant n\u2019indique aucune disposition l\u00e9gale que la d\u00e9cision du Ministre aurait m\u00e9connue alors surtout qu\u2019aucune des lois vis\u00e9es au moyen ne lui ouvre droit \u00e0 une prolongation d\u2019activit\u00e9 au-del\u00e0 de l\u2019\u00e2ge l\u00e9gal de la retraite ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019ainsi le moyen est mal fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

D\u00e9clare le recours recevable en la forme ;<\/p>\n

Au Fond, le rejette ;<\/p>\n

Dit que l\u2019amende consign\u00e9e est acquise au Tr\u00e9sor public ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, Chambre administrative, en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Fatou Habibatou DIALLO, CONSEILLERS : Mouhamadou NGOM, Mamadou Abdoulaye DIOUF, Amadou Hamady DIALLO, Abdoulaye NDIAYE, RAPPORTEUR : Fatou Habibatou DIALLO, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Boubacar Albert GAYE, AVOCAT : Cheikh Tidiane MBODJ, GREFFIER : Cheikh DIOP.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

144 Chambre administrative<\/p>\n

\u2013 30 \u2013<\/p>\n

Babacar NIANG c\/ Le Directeur de l\u2019Enregistrement des Domaines et du Timbre<\/p>\n

RECOURS POUR EXC\u00c8S DE POUVOIR \u2013 D\u00c9CH\u00c9ANCE \u2013 SIGNIFICATION DE LA REQU\u00caTE ACCOMPAGN\u00c9E DE LA COPIE DE LA D\u00c9CISION ADMINISTRATIVE ATTAQU\u00c9E \u00c0 LA PARTIE ADVERSE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT<\/p>\n

Il r\u00e9sulte des dispositions de l\u2019article 38 de la loi organique sur la Cour supr\u00eame que la requ\u00eate, accompagn\u00e9e soit d\u2019une exp\u00e9dition de la d\u00e9cision juridictionnelle attaqu\u00e9e, soit d\u2019une copie de la d\u00e9cision administrative attaqu\u00e9e, doit \u00eatre signifi\u00e9e par acte extrajudiciaire \u00e0 la partie adverse dans le d\u00e9lai de deux mois du d\u00e9p\u00f4t de la requ\u00eate en annulation, faute de quoi le requ\u00e9rant est d\u00e9clar\u00e9 d\u00e9chu de son recours ;<\/p>\n

Encourt la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance le requ\u00e9rant dont l\u2019acte de signification du recours mentionne simplement que la d\u00e9cision administrative attaqu\u00e9e a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9e au greffe de la Cour supr\u00eame, alors que cette d\u00e9cision aurait d\u00fb \u00eatre signifi\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 : Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent Judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat conclut \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Mamadou Seck pour nullit\u00e9 de la signification servie au Ministre charg\u00e9 de la Fonction publique ; Consid\u00e9rant que, certes, aux…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135554],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219078","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135554","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 : Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent Judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat conclut \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Mamadou Seck pour nullit\u00e9 de la signification servie au Ministre charg\u00e9 de la Fonction publique ; Consid\u00e9rant que, certes, aux...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T00:21:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009","og_description":"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 : Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent Judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat conclut \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Mamadou Seck pour nullit\u00e9 de la signification servie au Ministre charg\u00e9 de la Fonction publique ; Consid\u00e9rant que, certes, aux...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T00:21:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-32-du-25-aout-2009\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 32 du 25 ao\u00fbt 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219078"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}