{"id":1219603,"date":"2026-06-30T05:11:50","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T03:11:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T05:11:50","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T03:11:50","slug":"eclibervsce2025arr-262-025","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 janvier 2025 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 230409\/VI-21730<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 262025 – S\u00e9curit\u00e9 alimentaire (AFSCA) – 20\/01\/2025<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2025-01-29<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

77 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-28 17:55<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 262.025 du 20 janvier 2025 Affaires sociales et sant\u00e9 publique
\n – S\u00e9curit\u00e9 alimentaire (AFSCA) D\u00e9cision : Rejet\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

ecli_input ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:261.284
\necli_prefixe ECLI
\necli_pays BE
\necli_cour RVSCE
\necli_cour_old RVSCE
\necli_annee 2024
\necli_ordre 261.284
\necli_typedec 261
\necli_datedec
\necli_chambre
\necli_nosuite
\nInvalid ECLI ID – no_ordre – Invalid type decision 261
\nERROR JUPORTARobotRecordLienECLI ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:261.284 invalide Invalid ECLI ID – no_ordre – Invalid type decision 261 <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n VIe CHAMBRE
\n no 262.025 du 20 janvier 2025
\n A. 230.409\/VI-21.730
\n En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e DOGAN IMP-EX, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Joseph LECLERCQ, avocat, chauss\u00e9e Colonel Joset 55
\n 4630 Soumagne, contre :
\n l\u2019Agence f\u00e9d\u00e9rale pour la S\u00e9curit\u00e9 de la Cha\u00eene alimentaire (AFSCA), ayant pour conseil Me Jean-Fran\u00e7ois DE BOCK, avocat, Bosveldweg 70
\n 1180 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 11 mars 2020, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision prise par l\u2019AFSCA le 13 janvier 2020 refusant l\u2019autorisation pour le num\u00e9ro d\u2019unit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9tablissement 2.135.116.488 pour les activit\u00e9s \u201cd\u00e9taillant et boucherie\u201d \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Un arr\u00eat n\u00b0 261.284 du 5 novembre 2024 a remis l\u2019affaire \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 11 d\u00e9cembre 2024 \u00e0 10 heures. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:261.284).
\n Mme Florence Piret, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Philippe Levert loco Me Jean-Fran\u00e7ois De Bock, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie adverse, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu en ses observations.
\n VI \u2010 21.730 \u2010 1\/4
\n M. Constantin Nikis, premier auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Expos\u00e9 des faits
\n Les faits ont \u00e9t\u00e9 expos\u00e9s dans l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 261.284, pr\u00e9cit\u00e9. Il y a lieu de s\u2019y r\u00e9f\u00e9rer.
\n IV. Recevabilit\u00e9
\n Aux termes de l\u2019article 19, alin\u00e9a 1er, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, un recours en annulation au sens de l\u2019article 14, \u00a7 1er, de ces lois, peut \u00eatre port\u00e9, devant la section du contentieux administratif, par toute partie justifiant d\u2019une l\u00e9sion ou d\u2019un int\u00e9r\u00eat. Une partie requ\u00e9rante dispose de cet int\u00e9r\u00eat requis en droit si deux conditions sont remplies : tout d\u2019abord, l\u2019acte administratif attaqu\u00e9 doit lui causer un pr\u00e9judice personnel, direct, certain, actuel et l\u00e9ser un int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime ;
\n ensuite, l\u2019annulation de cet acte qui interviendra \u00e9ventuellement, doit lui procurer un avantage direct et personnel, si minime soit-il. Il appartient au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat d\u2019appr\u00e9cier si chaque partie requ\u00e9rante qui le saisit justifie d\u2019un int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 son recours. Sous r\u00e9serve des dispositions de droit international directement applicables, l\u2019article 19 des lois coordonn\u00e9es pr\u00e9cit\u00e9es fait ainsi obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019action populaire qui serait introduite par n\u2019importe quelle personne, qu\u2019elle soit physique ou morale. Le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat doit toutefois veiller \u00e0 ce que la condition de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat ne soit pas appliqu\u00e9e d\u2019une mani\u00e8re exag\u00e9r\u00e9ment restrictive ou formaliste.
\n Par ailleurs, l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat doit non seulement exister au moment de l\u2019introduction du recours mais \u00e9galement perdurer jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la cl\u00f4ture des d\u00e9bats.
\n Enfin, une partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019est pas soumise \u00e0 l\u2019obligation de d\u00e9finir ou de pr\u00e9ciser son int\u00e9r\u00eat au recours. Toutefois, si cet int\u00e9r\u00eat est mis en doute, il lui appartient alors de fournir des \u00e9claircissements \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard d\u00e8s qu\u2019elle en a l\u2019occasion dans le cadre de la proc\u00e9dure et d\u2019\u00e9tayer son int\u00e9r\u00eat. Si elle s\u2019ex\u00e9cute en ce sens, la partie requ\u00e9rante circonscrira alors \u00e9galement les motifs de sa demande et
\n VI \u2010 21.730 \u2010 2\/4
\n le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat devra tenir compte des limites du d\u00e9bat juridictionnel qu\u2019elle fixe.
\n Il s\u2019ensuit que c\u2019est au regard de la requ\u00eate et des \u00e9crits de proc\u00e9dure ult\u00e9rieurs, voire, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, des d\u00e9bats \u00e0 l\u2019audience, qu\u2019il convient d\u2019appr\u00e9cier l\u2019existence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une partie requ\u00e9rante \u00e0 agir.
\n \u00c0 l\u2019audience du 9 octobre 2024, \u00e0 laquelle la requ\u00e9rante n\u2019\u00e9tait ni pr\u00e9sente ni repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e et qui a donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 261.284, le conseil de la partie adverse a contest\u00e9 l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat actuel \u00e0 agir de la requ\u00e9rante, en faisant valoir que, depuis le 2 juin 2020, l\u2019unit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9tablissement num\u00e9rot\u00e9e 2.135.116.488 n\u2019exerce plus aucune activit\u00e9 AFSCA et que le g\u00e9rant unique de la requ\u00e9rante a, entretemps, fond\u00e9 une autre soci\u00e9t\u00e9 (0895.271.396) qui exploite une nouvelle unit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9tablissement (2.204.882.551), laquelle exerce d\u2019autres activit\u00e9s AFSCA. Elle a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 deux pi\u00e8ces \u00e0 l\u2019appui de ses affirmations.
\n L\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 261.284 a remis l\u2019affaire \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 11 d\u00e9cembre 2024
\n pour permettre \u00e0 la requ\u00e9rante de fournir des \u00e9claircissements sur son int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir et au premier auditeur de donner un avis \u00e0 ce sujet. Les pi\u00e8ces produites par la partie adverse \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 9 octobre 2024 ont \u00e9t\u00e9 vers\u00e9es au dossier de proc\u00e9dure et communiqu\u00e9es \u00e0 la requ\u00e9rante avec l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 261.284 qui lui a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9.
\n La requ\u00e9rante ne s\u2019est toutefois pas pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e et n\u2019\u00e9tait pas repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 11 d\u00e9cembre 2024. Elle n\u2019a donc apport\u00e9 aucune pr\u00e9cision sur le maintien de son int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 l\u2019annulation, pourtant contest\u00e9. En faisant preuve de passivit\u00e9 dans la d\u00e9monstration de son int\u00e9r\u00eat actuel \u00e0 agir, la requ\u00e9rante manifeste son d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat pour le traitement de son recours.
\n Dans ce contexte, il convient de constater que la requ\u00e9rante n’a ni invoqu\u00e9 ni d\u00e9montr\u00e9 la subsistance d’un int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 l’annulation de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.
\n Le recours est irrecevable.
\n V. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure
\n La partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure \u00e9valu\u00e9e au montant de base. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.
\n VI \u2010 21.730 \u2010 3\/4
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La requ\u00eate est rejet\u00e9e.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 20 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie adverse.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 20 janvier 2025, par la VIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n David De Roy, pr\u00e9sident de chambre Florence Piret, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, Aur\u00e9lien Vandeburie, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, Adeline Schyns, greffi\u00e8re.
\n La greffi\u00e8re, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Adeline Schyns David De Roy
\n VI \u2010 21.730 \u2010 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025\n <\/p>\n

Publication(s) li\u00e9e(s) <\/p>\n

pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 par:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.261.284 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 No R\u00f4le: A. 230409\/VI-21730 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262025 – S\u00e9curit\u00e9 alimentaire (AFSCA) – 20\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2025-01-29 Consultations: 77 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-28 17:55…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[159808],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[8683,17415,55659,15537,120926],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1219603","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2025arr-262-025","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-interet","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_keyword-rvsce","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 No R\u00f4le: A. 230409\/VI-21730 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262025 - S\u00e9curit\u00e9 alimentaire (AFSCA) - 20\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-29 Consultations: 77 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-28 17:55...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T03:11:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 20 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 No R\u00f4le: A. 230409\/VI-21730 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262025 - S\u00e9curit\u00e9 alimentaire (AFSCA) - 20\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-29 Consultations: 77 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-28 17:55...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T03:11:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-025\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.025"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1219603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1219603"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1219603"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1219603"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1219603"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1219603"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1219603"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1219603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}