{"id":1221137,"date":"2026-06-30T14:17:12","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T12:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T14:17:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T12:17:12","slug":"eclibervsce2025arr-262-043","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- continue here with main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>            <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p>        &nbsp;<br \/>\nConseil d&apos;\u00c9tat  <\/p>\n<p>            Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 21 janvier 2025            <\/p>\n<p>No ECLI:<\/p>\n<p>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043<\/p>\n<p>No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n<p>A. 242498\/XIII-10439<\/p>\n<p>Affaire:<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat 262043 &#8211; Permis d&apos;urbanisme et permis mixtes &#8211; 21\/01\/2025<\/p>\n<p>Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n<p>\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n<p>Date d&#8217;introduction:<\/p>\n<p>2025-01-23<\/p>\n<p>Consultations:<\/p>\n<p>82 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-28 14:54<\/p>\n<p>            Fiche            <\/p>\n<p> Arr\u00eat no 262.043 du 21 janvier 2025 Am\u00e9nagement du territoire, urbanisme,<br \/>\n        environnement et affaires connexes &#8211; Permis d&apos;urbanisme et permis<br \/>\n        mixtes D\u00e9cision :  D\u00e9sistement\n    <\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n<p>CONSEIL D&apos;ETAT\n<\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n<p>DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF &#8211; CONSEIL D&apos;\u00c9TAT &#8211; Arr\u00eats (Conseil d&apos;\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n<p>            Texte de la d\u00e9cision            <\/p>\n<p>\n       CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF<br \/>\n       LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XIIIe CHAMBRE<br \/>\n       no 262.043 du 21 janvier 2025<br \/>\n       A. 242.498\/XIII-10.439<br \/>\n       En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme B.W. PROMO, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Beno\u00eet HAVET et Guillaume DE SMET, avocats, rue de Bruxelles 51<br \/>\n       1400 Nivelles, contre :<br \/>\n       1. la R\u00e9gion wallonne, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son Gouvernement, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte HENDRICKX, avocat, rue de l\u2019Aurore 52<br \/>\n       1000 Bruxelles, 2. la commune de Baelen, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son coll\u00e8ge communal, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Mes Pierre HENRY et Nadia EL MOKHTARI, avocats, rue Mitoyenne 9<br \/>\n       4840 Welkenraedt.<br \/>\n       &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br \/>\n       I. Objet de la requ\u00eate<br \/>\n       1. Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 3 juillet 2024 par la voie \u00e9lectronique, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de :<br \/>\n       &#8211; l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 du 22 d\u00e9cembre 2023 par lequel le ministre de l\u2019Am\u00e9nagement du territoire refuse de lui d\u00e9livrer un permis d\u2019urbanisme ayant pour objet la construction group\u00e9e de 25 appartements et d\u2019emplacements de parking sur un bien sis route d\u2019Eupen, \u00e0 Baelen, et cadastr\u00e9 1\u00e8re division, section B, n\u00b0 450P2 ;<br \/>\n       &#8211; la d\u00e9cision du 6 juillet 2023 par laquelle le coll\u00e8ge communal de Baelen refuse de lui d\u00e9livrer un permis d\u2019urbanisme ayant pour objet la construction group\u00e9e de 25 appartements et d\u2019emplacements de parking sur le m\u00eame bien.<br \/>\n       XIII &#8211; 10.439 &#8211; 1\/4<br \/>\n       II. Proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       2. Les m\u00e9moires en r\u00e9ponse et les dossiers administratifs ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9s.<br \/>\n       Par un courrier du 19 novembre 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante a inform\u00e9 le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat de son souhait de se d\u00e9sister de son recours.<br \/>\n       M. Julien Lejeune, auditeur adjoint au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de faire application de l\u2019article 11\/5 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.<br \/>\n       Par une ordonnance du 12 d\u00e9cembre 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 16 janvier 2025.<br \/>\n       M. Lionel Renders, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., a expos\u00e9 son rapport.<br \/>\n       Me Armelle Siangang Tientcheu, loco Mes Guillaume De Smet et Beno\u00eet Havet, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie requ\u00e9rante, Me B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Hendrickx, avocat, comparaissant pour la premi\u00e8re partie adverse, et Me Nadia El Mokhtari, avocat, comparaissant pour la seconde partie adverse, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendues en leurs observations.<br \/>\n       Mme Isabelle Leysen, premier auditeur chef de section, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en son avis conforme.<br \/>\n       Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.<br \/>\n       III. D\u00e9sistement<br \/>\n       3. Par un courrier du 19 novembre 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante a inform\u00e9 le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat de son souhait de se d\u00e9sister de son recours.<br \/>\n       Rien ne s\u2019y oppose.<br \/>\n       IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure<br \/>\n       XIII &#8211; 10.439 &#8211; 2\/4<br \/>\n       4. Les parties adverses sollicitent chacune une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.<br \/>\n       La partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite une minoration du montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure au motif que son d\u00e9sistement est ant\u00e9rieur au d\u00e9p\u00f4t de son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique.<br \/>\n       5. Au sens de l\u2019article 30\/1, \u00a7 1er, des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure est \u00ab une intervention forfaitaire dans les frais et honoraires d\u2019avocat de la partie ayant obtenu gain de cause \u00bb.<br \/>\n       En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, en raison du d\u00e9sistement de la partie requ\u00e9rante, les parties adverses doivent \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9es comme ayant obtenu gain de cause. Il n\u2019est, par ailleurs, pas contest\u00e9 que les parties adverses ont expos\u00e9 des frais et honoraires d\u2019avocat dans le cadre du d\u00e9p\u00f4t d\u2019un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse.<br \/>\n       Il s\u2019ensuit qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu de r\u00e9duire le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure qui n\u2019est qu\u2019une intervention forfaitaire dans ces frais. Il convient d\u00e8s lors d\u2019allouer aux parties adverses une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure fix\u00e9e \u00e0 son montant de base de 770 euros.<br \/>\n       PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :<br \/>\n       Article 1er.<br \/>\n       Il est donn\u00e9 acte du d\u00e9sistement.<br \/>\n       Article 2.<br \/>\n       Une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros est accord\u00e9e \u00e0 chacune des parties adverses, \u00e0 la charge de la partie requ\u00e9rante.<br \/>\n       La contribution pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l\u2019article 66, 6o, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure, liquid\u00e9e \u00e0 la somme de 24 euros, est mise \u00e0 la charge de la partie requ\u00e9rante.<br \/>\n       XIII &#8211; 10.439 &#8211; 3\/4<br \/>\n       Les autres d\u00e9pens, liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 la somme de 200 euros, sont \u00e9galement mis \u00e0 la charge de la partie requ\u00e9rante.<br \/>\n       Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 21 janvier 2025, par la XIIIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :<br \/>\n       Lionel Renders, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, pr\u00e9sident f.f., Simon Pochet, greffier.<br \/>\n       Le Greffier Le Pr\u00e9sident,<br \/>\n       Simon Pochet Lionel Renders<br \/>\n       XIII &#8211; 10.439 &#8211; 4\/4<\/p>\n<p>Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043\n       <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail--> <\/p>\n<p>                  Imprimer cette page<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>          Taille d&#8217;impression          <\/p>\n<p>            S<br \/>\n            M<br \/>\n            L<br \/>\n            XL<\/p>\n<p>          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL<br \/>\n          &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>                  Fermer l&#8217;onglet          <\/p>\n<p>        <!-- Fin commandes de navigation page d\u00e9tail --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Action LOG \nfunction JUPORTARecordLogViewDecision  $iubel_id        : 281023\n                                       $action_type     : VIEW\n                                      &amp;$action_startmt  : 1779976536.0679\n                                      &amp;$action_duration : 159\n                                      &amp;$addressipremote : 103.115.10.116\n                                      &amp;$latitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$longitude       : null\n                                      &amp;$accuracy        : null\n                                      &amp;$altitude        : null\n                                      &amp;$langue_view     : FR\n--><br \/>\n<!-- Action_duration 159 millisec --><br \/>\n      <!-- end of main block (division \"content\") --><\/p>\n<p>    <!-- end of division \"page_main\" --><\/p>\n<p>              &#9993; info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n<p>              &copy;&nbsp; 2017-2026&nbsp;Service ICT &#8211; SPF Justice<\/p>\n<p>  <!-- end of division \"conteneur\" --><\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><\/p>\n<p>\n          Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n          == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n      <\/p>\n<p>  <!-- Balloon system info --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa Start --><br \/>\n          <!-- BalloonObjectPrepa End --><\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/juportal.be\/content\/ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043\/FR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#8217;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#8217;onglet Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 21 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 No R\u00f4le: A. 242498\/XIII-10439 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262043 &#8211; Permis d&#8217;urbanisme et permis mixtes &#8211; 21\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#8217;introduction: 2025-01-23 Consultations: 82 &#8211; derni\u00e8re vue&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[159901],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[136535,17415,85268,8460,15537],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1221137","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2025arr-262-043","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-ayant","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-indemnite","kji_keyword-janvier","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d&#039;impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l&#039;onglet Conseil d&#039;\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 21 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 No R\u00f4le: A. 242498\/XIII-10439 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262043 - Permis d&#039;urbanisme et permis mixtes - 21\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d&#039;introduction: 2025-01-23 Consultations: 82 - derni\u00e8re vue...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T12:17:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 21 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 No R\u00f4le: A. 242498\/XIII-10439 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262043 - Permis d'urbanisme et permis mixtes - 21\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-23 Consultations: 82 - derni\u00e8re vue...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T12:17:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-043\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.043"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1221137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1221137"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1221137"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1221137"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1221137"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1221137"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1221137"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1221137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}