{"id":1222935,"date":"2026-06-30T21:46:46","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T19:46:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T21:46:46","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T19:46:46","slug":"eclibervsce2025arr-262-057","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 22 janvier 2025 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 241215\/XI-24716<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 262057 – Divers (justice) – 22\/01\/2025<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2025-01-27<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

89 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-23 10:41<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 262.057 du 22 janvier 2025 Justice – Divers (justice) D\u00e9cision
\n : Rejet\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LE PR\u00c9SIDENT DE LA XIe CHAMBRE
\n no 262.057 du 22 janvier 2025
\n A. 241.215\/XI-24.716
\n En cause : P.B., ayant \u00e9lu domicile en Belgique, contre :
\n 1. le Tribunal de la jeunesse de Bruxelles, section francophone, 2. l\u2019\u00c9tat belge, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le Ministre de la Justice, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Bernard RENSON, avocat, avenue de l\u2019Arm\u00e9e 10
\n 1040 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 29 janvier 2024, le requ\u00e9rant demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision de la 21\u00e8me Chambre du Tribunal de jeunesse de Bruxelles section francophone \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n La premi\u00e8re partie adverse s\u2019est abstenue de d\u00e9poser un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse, ce dont la partie requ\u00e9rante a \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9e par un courrier \u00e9lectronique du 6 mai 2024, r\u00e9put\u00e9 re\u00e7u le 17 mai 2024
\n Un m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 par le seconde partie adverse et il a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante par un courrier \u00e9lectronique du 6 mai 2024, r\u00e9put\u00e9 re\u00e7u le 17 mai 2024.
\n M. Benoit Cuvelier, premier auditeur chef de section au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 une note le 29 juillet 2024 demandant que soit mise en \u0153uvre la proc\u00e9dure organis\u00e9e par l\u2019article 14bis du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n XI – 24.716 – 1\/3
\n Par un courrier \u00e9lectronique du 30 juillet 2024, r\u00e9put\u00e9 re\u00e7u le 9 ao\u00fbt 2024, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Par un courrier du 1er ao\u00fbt 2024, dont elle a accus\u00e9 r\u00e9ception le 5 ao\u00fbt 2024, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re partie adverse que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Par un courrier \u00e9lectronique du 30 juillet 2024, dont elle a pris connaissance le jour-m\u00eame, le greffe a notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la seconde partie adverse que la chambre allait statuer en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019elle ne demande \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis
\n L\u2019article 21 des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973, dispose, en son alin\u00e9a 2, que \u00ab lorsque la partie requ\u00e9rante ne respecte pas les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus pour l\u2019envoi du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique ou du m\u00e9moire ampliatif, la section statue sans d\u00e9lai, les parties entendues \u00e0 leur demande, en constatant l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis \u00bb. La mention de l\u2019article 21, alin\u00e9a 2, pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite lors de l\u2019envoi \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante d\u2019une copie du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse de la seconde partie adverse ainsi que lors de l\u2019envoi du courrier \u00e9lectronique l\u2019informant de l\u2019absence de d\u00e9p\u00f4t du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse par la premi\u00e8re partie adverse, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 14bis, \u00a7 2, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019ayant pas d\u00e9pos\u00e9 de m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique ni de m\u00e9moire ampliatif dans le d\u00e9lai imparti et aucune des parties n\u2019ayant demand\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00eatre entendue, il y a lieu de constater l\u2019absence de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat requis.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure
\n La seconde partie adverse sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande.
\n XI – 24.716 – 2\/3
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La requ\u00eate est rejet\u00e9e.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie requ\u00e9rante supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 24 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros, accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la seconde partie adverse.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 22 janvier 2025, par la XIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Denis Delvax, pr\u00e9sident de chambre f.f., Xavier Dupont, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Xavier Dupont Denis Delvax
\n XI – 24.716 – 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 22 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 No R\u00f4le: A. 241215\/XI-24716 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262057 – Divers (justice) – 22\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2025-01-27 Consultations: 89 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-23 10:41 Fiche…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[159991],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[16586,21837,17415,8460,99215],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1222935","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2025arr-262-057","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-adverse","kji_keyword-chambre","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-janvier","kji_keyword-memoire","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 22 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 No R\u00f4le: A. 241215\/XI-24716 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262057 - Divers (justice) - 22\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-27 Consultations: 89 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-23 10:41 Fiche...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T19:46:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 22 janvier 2025 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 No R\u00f4le: A. 241215\/XI-24716 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 262057 - Divers (justice) - 22\/01\/2025 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2025-01-27 Consultations: 89 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-05-23 10:41 Fiche...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-30T19:46:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2025arr-262-057\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.057"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1222935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1222935"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1222935"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1222935"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1222935"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1222935"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1222935"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1222935"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1222935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}