{"id":1224030,"date":"2026-07-01T02:19:19","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:19:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T02:19:19","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:19:19","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 09 du 05 mai 2009<\/p>\n<p>LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 :<\/p>\n<p>Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat a conclu \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Alioune Badara Man\u00e9, au motif qu\u2019il vise dans sa requ\u00eate l\u2019annulation de la d\u00e9cision implicite de rejet du Ministre de l\u2019Int\u00e9rieur, mais que dans l\u2019expos\u00e9 des moyens, il argumente essentiellement sur la d\u00e9cision du Maire de la Commune de Gu\u00e9diawaye, qu\u2019il ne produit d\u2019ailleurs pas aux d\u00e9bats ;<\/p>\n<p>Consid\u00e9rant qu\u2019il y a lieu de relever que suite au \u00ab recours gracieux \u00bb de Man\u00e9, le Ministre de l\u2019Int\u00e9rieur, par lettre du 22 janvier 2007, lui a r\u00e9pondu \u00ab qu\u2019il avait instruit ses services comp\u00e9tents de prendre les dispositions n\u00e9cessaires en vue du r\u00e8glement de l\u2019affaire\u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Consid\u00e9rant qu\u2019aux termes de l\u2019article 35 de la Loi organique n\u00b0 96-30 du 21 octobre 1996 sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, le recours pour exc\u00e8s de pouvoir n\u2019est recevable que contre une d\u00e9cision explicite ou implicite d\u2019une autorit\u00e9 administrative ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la r\u00e9ponse explicite du Ministre de l\u2019Int\u00e9rieur n\u2019est pas une d\u00e9cision au sens de la loi puisqu\u2019elle ne fait pas grief au requ\u00e9rant, et ne modifie en rien l\u2019ordonnancement juridique ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il y a lieu de d\u00e9clarer le recours irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n<p>84 Chambre administrative<\/p>\n<p>PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n<p>D\u00e9clare irrecevable le recours de Alioune Badara Man\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Dit que l\u2019amende consign\u00e9e est acquise au Tr\u00e9sor public ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, Chambre administrative, en son audience publique ordinaire tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT : Fatou Habibatou DIALLO, CONSEILLERS : Mamadou Abdoulaye DIOUF, Amadou Hamady DIALLO, Abdoulaye NDIAYE, RAPPORTEUR : Mamadou Abdoulaye DIOUF, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Boubacar Albert GAYE, AVOCAT : Cir\u00e9 Cl\u00e9dor LY, GREFFIER : Cheikh DIOP.<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n<p>Chambre administrative 85<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 8 \u2013<\/p>\n<p>Salif DIAGNE c\/ \u00c9tat du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal<\/p>\n<p>D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 AUTORISATION DE LICENCIEMENT \u2013 ABSENCE DE MOTIFS PROPRES \u2013 D\u00c9CISION CONFIRMATIVE DU MINISTRE DU TRAVAIL \u2013PR\u00c9SOMPTION D\u2019ADOPTION DE MOTIFS<\/p>\n<p>Si, en vertu de l\u2019article 215 du Code du Travail, l\u2019Inspecteur du Travail est tenu de motiver sa d\u00e9cision, aucune obligation l\u00e9gale de cette nature n\u2019est impos\u00e9e au Ministre statuant sur le recours hi\u00e9rarchique, qu\u2019il confirme ou infirme la d\u00e9cision qui lui est d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du Ministre du Travail, lorsqu\u2019elle ne comporte pas de motifs propres, est cens\u00e9e avoir adopt\u00e9 les motifs de la d\u00e9cision de l\u2019Inspecteur du Travail qu\u2019elle confirme.<\/p>\n<p>D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 AUTORISATION \u2013 CONDITION \u2013 GRAVIT\u00c9 DE LA FAUTE \u2013DEGR\u00c9 \u2013 APPR\u00c9CIATION \u2013 CONTR\u00d4LE \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE<\/p>\n<p>TR<\/p>\n<p>D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 AUTORISATION \u2013 CONDITION \u2013 FAUTE \u2013 DEGR\u00c9 DE GRAVIT\u00c9 \u2013 APPR\u00c9CIATION \u2013 OBLIGATION \u2013 AUTORIT\u00c9 ADMINISTRATIVE<\/p>\n<p>La rixe entre deux travailleurs constitue une faute, en ce qu\u2019elle porte atteinte \u00e0 la discipline et \u00e0 l\u2019ordre dans l\u2019entreprise.<\/p>\n<p>Cependant, lorsqu\u2019il est \u00e9tabli qu\u2019un d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du personnel, sollicit\u00e9 par son coll\u00e8gue pour des travaux, y a donn\u00e9 suite partiellement en lui demandant d\u2019attendre le retour des autres \u00e9quipes et que ce dernier est venu le relancer \u00e0 trois reprises dans son bureau en lui tenant des propos d\u00e9sobligeants qui ont abouti \u00e0 la rixe, cette attitude doit \u00eatre analys\u00e9e comme une provocation de nature \u00e0 att\u00e9nuer la faute commise par ce travailleur.<\/p>\n<p>Par suite, encourt l\u2019annulation pour erreur manifeste d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation, la d\u00e9cision du Ministre ayant autoris\u00e9 son licenciement, sans tenir compte des circonstances de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce et sans analyser le degr\u00e9 de gravit\u00e9 de la faute.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-03\/BA1-2008-2009.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-03\/BA1-2008-2009.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 09 du 05 mai 2009 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 : Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat a conclu \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Alioune Badara Man\u00e9, au motif qu\u2019il vise dans sa requ\u00eate l\u2019annulation de la d\u00e9cision implicite de rejet du Ministre&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135554],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1224030","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135554","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 09 du 05 mai 2009 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 : Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat a conclu \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Alioune Badara Man\u00e9, au motif qu\u2019il vise dans sa requ\u00eate l\u2019annulation de la d\u00e9cision implicite de rejet du Ministre...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T00:19:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009","og_description":"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 09 du 05 mai 2009 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 : Consid\u00e9rant que, dans son m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense, l\u2019Agent judiciaire de l\u2019\u00c9tat a conclu \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours de Alioune Badara Man\u00e9, au motif qu\u2019il vise dans sa requ\u00eate l\u2019annulation de la d\u00e9cision implicite de rejet du Ministre...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-01T00:19:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-05-mai-2009\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 05 mai 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1224030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1224030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1224030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1224030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1224030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1224030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1224030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1224030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1224030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}