{"id":1224037,"date":"2026-07-01T02:19:36","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:19:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T02:19:36","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:19:36","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal soul\u00e8ve la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance de Form Action, par application de l\u2019article 20 alin\u00e9a 1er de la loi organique n\u00b0 92-25 du 30 mai 1992 sur la Cour de cassation et des articles 39 et 57-3\u00b0 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, au motif, que le pourvoi n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 signifi\u00e9 au Parquet g\u00e9n\u00e9ral ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte des articles 116-1 et suivants du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, que le minist\u00e8re public, en mati\u00e8re d\u2019immunit\u00e9 juridictionnelle, n\u2019a pas qualit\u00e9 pour agir seul, en lieu et place de la partie qui en sollicite le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019ainsi, l\u2019intervention du minist\u00e8re public \u00e0 l\u2019instance a, pour objet, non seulement de dispenser la partie qui se pr\u00e9vaut de l\u2019immunit\u00e9 de compara\u00eetre, mais \u00e9galement, d\u2019appuyer les pr\u00e9tentions de cette derni\u00e8re, ce qui lui conf\u00e8re la qualit\u00e9 de partie jointe, exclusive des formalit\u00e9s prescrites par l\u2019article 20 alin\u00e9a 1 de la loi organique sur la Cour de cassation ;<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance n\u2019est pas encourue ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat infirmatif attaqu\u00e9, que dans le litige opposant les organisations non gouvernementales Form Action et Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, celle-ci a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9clar\u00e9e b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l\u2019immunit\u00e9 juridictionnelle et d\u2019ex\u00e9cution au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen tir\u00e9 de la perte du fondement juridique en ce que, l\u2019acte d\u00e9nomm\u00e9 \u00ab attestation d\u2019immunit\u00e9 de juridiction et d\u2019ex\u00e9cution \u00bb du 26 juillet 2006, d\u00e9livr\u00e9 par le minist\u00e8re des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res, a \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9 par l\u2019arr\u00eat du Conseil d\u2019Etat du 22 avril 2008 ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre civile et commerciale 35<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 27\/08 du 22 avril du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que, pour reconna\u00eetre l\u2019immunit\u00e9 juridictionnelle \u00e0 Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, l\u2019arr\u00eat retient \u00ab qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte des dispositions des articles 116-2 et 116-3 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile que la production de l\u2019attestation d\u2019accr\u00e9ditation d\u00e9livr\u00e9e par le Minist\u00e8re des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res reconnaissant l\u2019immunit\u00e9 de juridiction adoss\u00e9e aux r\u00e9quisitions du Minist\u00e8re public constituent les pi\u00e8ces exig\u00e9es par les textes suscit\u00e9s pour mettre la Cour en situation de constater le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l\u2019immunit\u00e9 revendiqu\u00e9e au profit de Plan International S\u00e9n\u00e9gal ; que la Cour devant simplement constater l\u2019existence dudit privil\u00e8ge en faveur de celui qui le revendique, ne saurait s\u2019arroger un pouvoir d\u2019analyse encore moins de critique relativement \u00e0 un acte de souverainet\u00e9 qui rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive du pouvoir ex\u00e9cutif \u00bb\u2026 ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, alors que l\u2019acte d\u00e9nomm\u00e9 \u00ab attestation d\u2019immunit\u00e9 de juridiction et d\u2019ex\u00e9cution \u00bb, d\u00e9livr\u00e9 le 25 juin 2006, par le Minist\u00e8re des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res, sur lequel s\u2019est fond\u00e9e la Cour d\u2019Appel pour reconna\u00eetre le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l\u2019immunit\u00e9 juridictionnelle \u00e0 Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, a \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9 par l\u2019arr\u00eat du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat susvis\u00e9, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, par l\u2019effet de cette annulation, se trouve priv\u00e9 de base l\u00e9gale ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS<\/p>\n

Et sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de statuer sur les autres moyens :<\/p>\n

Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 353 rendu le 07 mai 2007 par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Remet, en cons\u00e9quence, la cause et les parties au m\u00eame et semblable \u00e9tat o\u00f9 elles \u00e9taient avant ledit arr\u00eat et, pour \u00eatre fait droit, les renvoie devant la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint Louis ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende consign\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Condamne l\u2019Organisation non gouvernementale Plan International S\u00e9n\u00e9gal aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dakar, en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour Supr\u00eame, Chambre civile et commerciale en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Ibrahima GU\u00c9YE, Conseillers : Mouhamadou DIAWARA, Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Jean Louis TOUPANE, RAPPORTEUR : Jean Louis TOUPANE, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Abdourahmane DIOUF, AVOCAT : Joseph Etienne NDIONE, GREFFIER : Maurice KAMA.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

36 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n

\u2013 6 \u2013<\/p>\n

Abdoul Aziz DIOP c\/ Abdou Mazide NDIAYE<\/p>\n

CASSATION \u2013 MOYEN \u2013 MOYEN TIR\u00c9 DU D\u00c9FAUT DE R\u00c9PONSE \u00c0 CONCLUSIONS \u2013 IRRECEVABILIT\u00c9 \u2013 PRODUCTION ET VISA DES CONCLUSIONS \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT<\/p>\n

Est irrecevable le moyen tir\u00e9 d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 conclusions lorsque celles-ci ne sont ni produites, ni vis\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 LA COUR, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Attendu que Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal soul\u00e8ve la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance de Form Action, par application de l\u2019article 20 alin\u00e9a 1er de la loi organique n\u00b0 92-25 du 30 mai 1992 sur la Cour de cassation et des articles 39 et 57-3\u00b0 du code de proc\u00e9dure…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135554],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1224037","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135554","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 LA COUR, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Attendu que Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal soul\u00e8ve la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance de Form Action, par application de l\u2019article 20 alin\u00e9a 1er de la loi organique n\u00b0 92-25 du 30 mai 1992 sur la Cour de cassation et des articles 39 et 57-3\u00b0 du code de proc\u00e9dure...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T00:19:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009","og_description":"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 LA COUR, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Attendu que Plan S\u00e9n\u00e9gal soul\u00e8ve la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance de Form Action, par application de l\u2019article 20 alin\u00e9a 1er de la loi organique n\u00b0 92-25 du 30 mai 1992 sur la Cour de cassation et des articles 39 et 57-3\u00b0 du code de proc\u00e9dure...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-01T00:19:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-16-du-18-mars-2009\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 16 du 18 mars 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1224037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1224037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1224037"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1224037"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1224037"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1224037"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1224037"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1224037"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1224037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}