{"id":1224056,"date":"2026-07-01T02:20:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:20:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T02:20:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:20:33","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008<\/p>\n

LA COUR,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que les d\u00e9fendeurs soul\u00e8vent la nullit\u00e9 de l\u2019exploit de signification du pourvoi et, par voie de cons\u00e9quence, la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance des demandeurs au motif que ledit exploit n\u2019a pas reproduit les dispositions de l\u2019article 21 de la loi organique sur la Cour de cassation, comme le prescrit, \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9, l\u2019article 20 de la m\u00eame loi organique ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 est couverte par la sauvegarde du principe du contradictoire d\u00e8s lors que, comme en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la partie adverse a pu d\u00e9poser un m\u00e9moire en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance n\u2019est pas encourue ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique, pris en ses deux branches, tir\u00e9 d\u2019une insuffisance de motifs et d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale en ce que, d\u2019une part, \u00ab la Chambre d\u2019accusation s\u2019est limit\u00e9e, en ordonnant le non lieu, \u00e0 relever que l\u2019examen bilat\u00e9ral de ladite mission r\u00e9v\u00e8le la nature civile des relations entre les parties sans pr\u00e9ciser en quoi les dispositions p\u00e9nales vis\u00e9es par l\u2019inculpation ne sont pas applicables aux faits de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce alors qu\u2019ayant statu\u00e9 comme juridiction de fond, elle devait les appr\u00e9cier et requalifier en ad\u00e9quation aux r\u00e8gles relatives \u00e0 l\u2019abus de confiance et \u00e0 l\u2019escroquerie et, d\u2019autre part, elle a \u00e9cart\u00e9 les qualifications retenues sans, en aucun cas, faire r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux dispositions des articles 383 et 379 qui d\u00e9finissent l\u2019abus de confiance et l\u2019escroquerie alors qu\u2019il ressort clairement des faits de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce qu\u2019en utilisant un montant de 349.600.000 francs \u00e0 des fins autres que le remboursement du cr\u00e9dit consenti, la banque s\u2019est rendue coupable d\u2019abus de confiance \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Mais attendu que pour ordonner le non lieu, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a, entre autres motifs, relev\u00e9 que la responsabilit\u00e9 p\u00e9nale des dirigeants sociaux, en l\u2019absence d\u2019une faute d\u00e9lictueuse directe et personnelle, ne saurait \u00eatre retenue en l\u2019\u00e9tat de notre l\u00e9gislation criminelle ;<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre criminelle 13<\/p>\n

Attendu, ainsi, que la Chambre d\u2019accusation a, par une motivation suffisante et exempte de contradiction, correctement d\u00e9duit le mal fond\u00e9 des poursuites ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que le pourvoi doit \u00eatre rejet\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par Abdoulaye Diakit\u00e9, \u00e8s nom et \u00e8s qualit\u00e9, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b079 rendu le 05 mai 2006 par la Chambre d\u2019accusation de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la confiscation de l\u2019amende ;<\/p>\n

Le condamne aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la Cour d\u2019assises de Saint-Louis en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat \u00e0 la diligence du Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e9s la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, Chambre criminelle, en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an ci-dessus et \u00e0 laquelle si\u00e9geaient Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT\u2013 RAPPORTEUR : Mamadou Badio CAMARA, CONSEILLERS : Cheikh Tidiane COULIBALY, Cir\u00e9 Aly BA, Ch\u00e9rif SOUMAR\u00c9, Mama KONAT\u00c9, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Boubacar Albert GAYE, RAPPORTEUR : Mamadou Badio CAMARA, AVOCAT : Adnan YAHYA, GREFFIER : Ibrahima SOW.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

14 Chambre criminelle<\/p>\n

\u2013 4 \u2013<\/p>\n

Minist\u00e8re Public et Autres c\/ Papa Amath SAN\u00c9<\/p>\n

D\u00c9TOURNEMENT DENIERS PUBLICS \u2013 CHAMBRE D\u2019ACCUSATION \u2013- LIBERT\u00c9 PROVISOIRE \u2013 CONDITION \u2013 \u00c9TAT DE SANT\u00c9 INCOMPATIBILIT\u00c9 AVEC LE MAINTIEN EN D\u00c9TENTION, M\u00caME DANS UN CENTRE HOSPITALIER<\/p>\n

M\u00e9conna\u00eet le sens et la port\u00e9e de l\u2019article 140 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui, pour raison de sant\u00e9, ordonne la mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire du pr\u00e9venu, inculp\u00e9 de d\u00e9tournement de deniers publics, sans relever que son \u00e9tat est incompatible avec le maintien en d\u00e9tention, m\u00eame dans un centre hospitalier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 LA COUR, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Attendu que les d\u00e9fendeurs soul\u00e8vent la nullit\u00e9 de l\u2019exploit de signification du pourvoi et, par voie de cons\u00e9quence, la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance des demandeurs au motif que ledit exploit n\u2019a pas reproduit les dispositions de l\u2019article 21 de la loi organique sur la Cour…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135599],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8464,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1224056","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135599","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 LA COUR, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Attendu que les d\u00e9fendeurs soul\u00e8vent la nullit\u00e9 de l\u2019exploit de signification du pourvoi et, par voie de cons\u00e9quence, la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance des demandeurs au motif que ledit exploit n\u2019a pas reproduit les dispositions de l\u2019article 21 de la loi organique sur la Cour...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T00:20:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008","og_description":"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 LA COUR, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Attendu que les d\u00e9fendeurs soul\u00e8vent la nullit\u00e9 de l\u2019exploit de signification du pourvoi et, par voie de cons\u00e9quence, la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance des demandeurs au motif que ledit exploit n\u2019a pas reproduit les dispositions de l\u2019article 21 de la loi organique sur la Cour...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-01T00:20:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-20-du-16-decembre-2008\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 20 du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1224056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1224056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1224056"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1224056"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1224056"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1224056"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1224056"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1224056"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1224056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}