{"id":1224075,"date":"2026-07-01T02:21:32","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:21:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T02:21:32","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T00:21:32","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008<\/p>\n

LA COUR SUPR\u00caME,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

EN LA FORME :<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que la requ\u00eate a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite dans les forme et d\u00e9lai prescrits par la loi ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il y a lieu de la d\u00e9clarer recevable ;<\/p>\n

AU FOND :<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que l\u2019\u00c9tat du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal sollicite le sursis \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision du 27 juin 2008 du comit\u00e9 de r\u00e8glement des diff\u00e9rends statuant en commission des litiges de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 de R\u00e9gulation des March\u00e9s publics qui a retenu que :<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

Chambre administrative 89<\/p>\n

– les dispositions de l\u2019article 37 paragraphe 3 du Code des March\u00e9s publics, en ce qui concerne le repr\u00e9sentant du contr\u00f4leur financier dans les commissions des march\u00e9s, sont contraires aux dispositions des articles 13 et 14 de la directive n\u00b0 5\/2005\/CM\/UEMOA et doivent par cons\u00e9quent \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9es ;<\/p>\n

– que le contr\u00f4leur financier ne peut si\u00e9ger dans la Commission des March\u00e9s de l\u2019Agence Autonome des Travaux Routiers comme membre ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019appui de sa requ\u00eate, il soul\u00e8ve un moyen unique tir\u00e9 de la violation de la loi pris en deux branches \u00e0 savoir :<\/p>\n

La premi\u00e8re branche du moyen tir\u00e9e de la violation de l\u2019article 1er de la loi organique sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat et des articles 18 \u00e0 23 du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2007-546 du 25 avril 2007 portant organisation et fonctionnement de l\u2019Autorit\u00e9 de R\u00e9gulation des March\u00e9s Publics ;<\/p>\n

La deuxi\u00e8me branche du moyen tir\u00e9e de la violation des articles 37 al 3 du Code des March\u00e9s publics, 13 et 14 de la Directive n\u00b0 04\/2005 de l\u2019UEMOA ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que les moyens ainsi soulev\u00e9s paraissent s\u00e9rieux en l\u2019\u00e9tat actuel de l\u2019instruction ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que le pr\u00e9judice encouru par le requ\u00e9rant en cas d\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e serait difficilement r\u00e9parable pour le contr\u00f4leur financier qui ne pourra plus jouer sa mission de contr\u00f4le et d\u2019alerte dans la passation des March\u00e9s publics ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il y a lieu d\u2019ordonner le sursis \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e par application des dispositions des alin\u00e9as 1er et 2 de l\u2019article 36 de la loi organique n\u00b0 96-30 du 21 octobre 1996 sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat modifi\u00e9e par les lois organiques n\u00b0 99-70 et n\u00b0 99-72 du 17 f\u00e9vrier 1999 ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS :<\/p>\n

EN LA FORME<\/p>\n

D\u00e9clare recevable la requ\u00eate aux fins de sursis \u00e0 ex\u00e9cution ;<\/p>\n

AU FOND<\/p>\n

Ordonne le sursis \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 014 du 27 juin 2008 du Comit\u00e9 de r\u00e8glement des diff\u00e9rends de l\u2019Autorit\u00e9 de R\u00e9gulation des March\u00e9s publics ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, Chambre administrative, en son audience publique de vacation tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : Fatou Habibatou DIALLO, CONSEILLERS : Mamadou Yakham LEYE, Mamadou Abdoulaye DIOUF, Amadou Hamady DIALLO, Abdoulaye NDIAYE, RAPPORTEUR : Fatou Habibatou DIALLO, AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : Youssoupha DIAW MBODJ, AVOCAT : Gu\u00e9del NDIAYE, GREFFIER : Cheikh DIOP.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/p>\n

90 Chambre administrative<\/p>\n

\u2013 10 \u2013<\/p>\n

GEODIS WILSON S\u00c9N\u00c9GAL c\/ \u00c9tat du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal<\/p>\n

ACTE ADMINISTRATIF \u2013 AUTORISATION DE LICENCIEMENT DU D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 D\u00c9CISION DU MINISTRE DU TRAVAIL \u2013OBLIGATION DE MOTIVATION \u2013 INEXISTENCE<\/p>\n

A l\u2019inverse de la d\u00e9cision de l\u2019inspecteur du Travail statuant sur le licenciement d\u2019un d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du personnel, celle du Ministre du Travail qui se prononce sur le recours hi\u00e9rarchique n\u2019a pas \u00e0 \u00eatre sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9e, qu\u2019il confirme ou infirme la d\u00e9cision qui lui est d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9e.<\/p>\n

D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 AUTORISATION DE LICENCIEMENT \u2013 ABSENCE DE MOTIFS PROPRES \u2013 D\u00c9CISION CONFIRMATIVE DU MINISTRE DU TRAVAIL \u2013PR\u00c9SOMPTION D\u2019ADOPTION DE MOTIFS<\/p>\n

Lorsque la d\u00e9cision du Ministre du Travail ne comporte pas de motifs propres, elle est cens\u00e9e avoir adopt\u00e9 ceux articul\u00e9s dans la d\u00e9cision qu\u2019elle confirme.<\/p>\n

D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 AUTORISATION \u2013 CONDITION \u2013 GRAVIT\u00c9 DE LA FAUTE \u2013APPR\u00c9CIATION \u2013 CONTR\u00d4LE \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE<\/p>\n

D\u00c9L\u00c9GU\u00c9 DU PERSONNEL \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 AUTORISATION \u2013 CONDITION \u2013 FAUTE LOURDE \u2013CONTR\u00d4LE DE QUALIFICATION \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE<\/p>\n

La faute lourde du d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du personnel, pouvant justifier sa mise \u00e0 pied, ne doit pas \u00eatre pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e, ce mandataire ne r\u00e9pondant pas, de plein droit, des agissements de la communaut\u00e9 des travailleurs. D\u00e8s lors, n\u2019encourt pas une annulation pour erreur manifeste d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation, la d\u00e9cision du Ministre du Travail confirmant le refus de l\u2019inspecteur du Travail d\u2019autoriser le licenciement de d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s du personnel en se fondant sur la non pertinence de certaines preuves produites et l\u2019insuffisance de gravit\u00e9 d\u2019autres faits imputables aux mis en cause.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; EN LA FORME : Consid\u00e9rant que la requ\u00eate a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite dans les forme et d\u00e9lai prescrits par la loi ; Qu\u2019il y a lieu de la d\u00e9clarer recevable ; AU FOND : Consid\u00e9rant que l\u2019\u00c9tat du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal sollicite le sursis…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135599],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15227,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1224075","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-135599","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; EN LA FORME : Consid\u00e9rant que la requ\u00eate a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite dans les forme et d\u00e9lai prescrits par la loi ; Qu\u2019il y a lieu de la d\u00e9clarer recevable ; AU FOND : Consid\u00e9rant que l\u2019\u00c9tat du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal sollicite le sursis...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T00:21:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008","og_description":"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 LA COUR SUPR\u00caME, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; EN LA FORME : Consid\u00e9rant que la requ\u00eate a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite dans les forme et d\u00e9lai prescrits par la loi ; Qu\u2019il y a lieu de la d\u00e9clarer recevable ; AU FOND : Consid\u00e9rant que l\u2019\u00c9tat du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal sollicite le sursis...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-01T00:21:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-10-du-25-septembre-2008\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 10 du 25 septembre 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1224075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1224075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1224075"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1224075"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1224075"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1224075"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1224075"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1224075"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1224075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}