{"id":562476,"date":"2026-04-14T23:24:07","date_gmt":"2026-04-14T21:24:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T09:58:37","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T07:58:37","slug":"bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<h3>Tenor<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Betroffenen gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 21. August 2025 (III-4 VAs 86-87\/25 und 89-91\/25) wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Der Beschwerdef\u00fchrer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<h3>Gr\u00fcnde<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_1\">1<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Die Rechtsbeschwerde ist unzul\u00e4ssig, weil sie in dem angefochtenen Beschluss nicht zugelassen wurde (\u00a7 29 Abs. 1 EGGVG); Schweigen bedeutet Nichtzulassung. Die Nichtzulassung ist grunds\u00e4tzlich unanfechtbar, ein etwaiger Ausnahmetatbestand liegt nicht vor (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 21. Oktober 2025 &#8211; 5 ARs 14\/25).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<table class=\"Rsp\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Cirener\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Gericke\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Mosbacher<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">K\u00f6hler\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Resch\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/?quelle=jlink&#038;docid=jb-KORE605372026&#038;psml=bsjrsprod.psml&#038;max=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/portal\/page\/bsjrsprod.psml\/screen\/JWPDFScreen\/filename\/BGH_5_ARs_13-25_KORE605372026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tenor Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Betroffenen gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 21. August 2025 (III-4 VAs 86-87\/25 und 89-91\/25) wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen. Der Beschwerdef\u00fchrer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Die Rechtsbeschwerde ist unzul\u00e4ssig, weil sie in dem angefochtenen Beschluss nicht zugelassen wurde (\u00a7 29 Abs. 1 EGGVG); Schweigen bedeutet Nichtzulassung. Die Nichtzulassung ist grunds\u00e4tzlich&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[8711],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7808,7806,8712,7809],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-562476","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-5-strafsenat","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-bundesgerichtshof","kji_keyword-strafsenat","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Betroffenen gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 21. August 2025 (III-4 VAs 86-87\/25 und 89-91\/25) wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen. Der Beschwerdef\u00fchrer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Die Rechtsbeschwerde ist unzul\u00e4ssig, weil sie in dem angefochtenen Beschluss nicht zugelassen wurde (\u00a7 29 Abs. 1 EGGVG); Schweigen bedeutet Nichtzulassung. Die Nichtzulassung ist grunds\u00e4tzlich...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-16T07:58:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\\\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-14T21:24:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-16T07:58:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\\\/25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25","og_description":"Tenor Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Betroffenen gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 21. August 2025 (III-4 VAs 86-87\/25 und 89-91\/25) wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen. Der Beschwerdef\u00fchrer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Die Rechtsbeschwerde ist unzul\u00e4ssig, weil sie in dem angefochtenen Beschluss nicht zugelassen wurde (\u00a7 29 Abs. 1 EGGVG); Schweigen bedeutet Nichtzulassung. Die Nichtzulassung ist grunds\u00e4tzlich...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-16T07:58:37+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/","name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-14T21:24:07+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-16T07:58:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bgh-5-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-24-03-2026-5-ars-13-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-03-24, 5 ARs 13\/25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/562476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=562476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=562476"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=562476"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=562476"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=562476"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=562476"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=562476"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=562476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}