{"id":666076,"date":"2026-04-24T00:52:06","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T22:52:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T00:52:06","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T22:52:06","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: GRA?A AMARAL. I – Em paralelo com o que vinha a ser defendido na jurisprud?ncia e na doutrina relativamente ? subida imediata e diferida dos agravos, a situa??o de absoluta inutilidade a que alude a al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, reporta-se t?o s? ao resultado do recurso em si mesmo; n?o aos actos processuais, entretanto praticados. II – O sentido da inutilidade consagrada na lei s? se verifica quando o despacho recorrido produza um resultado irrevers?vel em termos de n?o poder ser colmatado pela eventual anula??o do processado posterior ? interposi??o do recurso. III – O recurso de despacho que, suprimindo as nulidades invocadas pelo exequente, indeferiu o requerimento de reclama??o da conta\/nota discriminativa do agente de execu??o por falta de fundamento, esclarecendo que a execu??o prossegue para pagamento\/cobran?a da quantia de ? 84 301,97, n?o ? pass?vel de apela??o aut?noma, por n?o se subsumir ? situa??o prevista na al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, por remiss?o da al. a) do n.? 2 do art. 853.? do CPC.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: GRA?A AMARAL. I – Em paralelo com o que vinha a ser defendido na jurisprud?ncia e na doutrina relativamente ? subida imediata e diferida dos agravos, a situa??o de absoluta inutilidade a que alude a al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, reporta-se t?o s? ao resultado do recurso em si mesmo; n?o aos actos processuais, entretanto praticados. II – O sentido da inutilidade consagrada na lei s? se verifica quando o despacho recorrido produza um resultado irrevers?vel em termos de n?o poder ser colmatado pela eventual anula??o do processado posterior ? interposi??o do recurso. III – O recurso de despacho que, suprimindo as nulidades invocadas pelo exequente, indeferiu o requerimento de reclama??o da conta\/nota discriminativa do agente de execu??o por falta de fundamento, esclarecendo que a execu??o prossegue para pagamento\/cobran?a da quantia de ? 84 301,97, n?o ? pass?vel de apela??o aut?noma, por n?o se subsumir ? situa??o prevista na al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, por remiss?o da al. a) do n.? 2 do art. 853.? do CPC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-666076","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: GRA?A AMARAL. I - Em paralelo com o que vinha a ser defendido na jurisprud?ncia e na doutrina relativamente ? subida imediata e diferida dos agravos, a situa??o de absoluta inutilidade a que alude a al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, reporta-se t?o s? ao resultado do recurso em si mesmo; n?o aos actos processuais, entretanto praticados. II - O sentido da inutilidade consagrada na lei s? se verifica quando o despacho recorrido produza um resultado irrevers?vel em termos de n?o poder ser colmatado pela eventual anula??o do processado posterior ? interposi??o do recurso. III - O recurso de despacho que, suprimindo as nulidades invocadas pelo exequente, indeferiu o requerimento de reclama??o da conta\/nota discriminativa do agente de execu??o por falta de fundamento, esclarecendo que a execu??o prossegue para pagamento\/cobran?a da quantia de ? 84 301,97, n?o ? pass?vel de apela??o aut?noma, por n?o se subsumir ? situa??o prevista na al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, por remiss?o da al. a) do n.? 2 do art. 853.? do CPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\\\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T22:52:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\\\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07","og_description":"Relator: GRA?A AMARAL. I - Em paralelo com o que vinha a ser defendido na jurisprud?ncia e na doutrina relativamente ? subida imediata e diferida dos agravos, a situa??o de absoluta inutilidade a que alude a al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, reporta-se t?o s? ao resultado do recurso em si mesmo; n?o aos actos processuais, entretanto praticados. II - O sentido da inutilidade consagrada na lei s? se verifica quando o despacho recorrido produza um resultado irrevers?vel em termos de n?o poder ser colmatado pela eventual anula??o do processado posterior ? interposi??o do recurso. III - O recurso de despacho que, suprimindo as nulidades invocadas pelo exequente, indeferiu o requerimento de reclama??o da conta\/nota discriminativa do agente de execu??o por falta de fundamento, esclarecendo que a execu??o prossegue para pagamento\/cobran?a da quantia de ? 84 301,97, n?o ? pass?vel de apela??o aut?noma, por n?o se subsumir ? situa??o prevista na al. h) do n.? 2 do art. 644.? do CPC, por remiss?o da al. a) do n.? 2 do art. 853.? do CPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T22:52:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5865-15-9t8prt-f-p1-s1-2022-06-07-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5865\/15.9T8PRT-F.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-07"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/666076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=666076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=666076"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=666076"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=666076"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=666076"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=666076"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=666076"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=666076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}