{"id":784541,"date":"2026-04-30T17:11:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T15:11:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T17:11:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T15:11:43","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 &#8211; Litige foncier"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Foncier<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : LITIGE FONCIER \u2013 ACTION EN EXPULSION DU NON PROPRIETAIRE \u2013 IRRECEVABLE<\/p>\n<p>La propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse est inscrite aux noms des d\u00e9fendeurs au pourvoi. En d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l\u2019action en expulsion formul\u00e9e par les demandeurs au pourvoi, loin d\u2019avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d\u2019appel en a fait une exacte application.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 327 du 20 juillet 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 952\/13-CO<\/p>\n<p>LITIGE FONCIER \u2013 ACTION EN EXPULSION DU NON PROPRI\u00c9TAIRE \u2013 IRRECEVABLE<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab La propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse est inscrite aux noms des d\u00e9fendeurs au pourvoi. En d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l\u2019action en expulsion formul\u00e9e par les demandeurs au pourvoi, loin d\u2019avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d\u2019appel en a fait une exacte application. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi vingt juillet deux mille dix-huit, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.S. et Raz S. demeurant \u00e0 [adresse], ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre RATSIZAFY Sylvie Liliane Isabelle, contre l&#039;arr\u00eat n\u00b0 887 rendu le 13 ao\u00fbt 2013 par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d&#039;Appel d&#039;Antananarivo dans l&#039;affaire les opposant aux consorts R.A.H. et R.T. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation de l&#039;article 26 de la Loi organique n\u00b02004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame, pour violation de la loi, absence, insuffisance, contradiction de motifs et g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement impossibilit\u00e9 pour la Cour Supr\u00eame d&#039;exercer son contr\u00f4le ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d&#039;Appel a bas\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur le certificat d&#039;immatriculation et de situation juridique du 29 mai 2012 vers\u00e9 au dossier relatif \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 &quot; MANAMPISOA &quot; TF 2419-BAV sise \u00e0 [adresse], laquelle propri\u00e9t\u00e9 appartient \u00e0 R.L.I., R.D. et R.F. alors que le terrain litigieux appartient aux demandeurs qui ont d\u00fb c\u00e9der \u00e0 l&#039;Etat une partie de leur propri\u00e9t\u00e9 lors de la construction de la RN2 ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le texte de loi vis\u00e9 au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu&#039;en l&#039;\u00e9tat de la proc\u00e9dure la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse est inscrite au nom des d\u00e9fendeurs, que loin d&#039;avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d&#039;Appel en a fait une exacte application en d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l&#039;action en expulsion formul\u00e9e par les demandeurs ; que le moyen non fond\u00e9 ne saurait prosp\u00e9rer ; <\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne les demandeurs \u00e0 l&#039;amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFEF41E\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFEF41E\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : LITIGE FONCIER \u2013 ACTION EN EXPULSION DU NON PROPRIETAIRE \u2013 IRRECEVABLE La propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse est inscrite aux noms des d\u00e9fendeurs au pourvoi. En d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l\u2019action en expulsion formul\u00e9e par les demandeurs au pourvoi, loin d\u2019avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d\u2019appel en a fait une exacte application. Cassation&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,20539,8600,49317,48966],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-784541","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-foncier","kji_keyword-juillet","kji_keyword-litige","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 - Litige foncier - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 - Litige foncier\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : LITIGE FONCIER \u2013 ACTION EN EXPULSION DU NON PROPRIETAIRE \u2013 IRRECEVABLE La propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse est inscrite aux noms des d\u00e9fendeurs au pourvoi. En d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l\u2019action en expulsion formul\u00e9e par les demandeurs au pourvoi, loin d\u2019avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d\u2019appel en a fait une exacte application. Cassation...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\\\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 - Litige foncier - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T15:11:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\\\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 &#8211; Litige foncier\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 - Litige foncier - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 - Litige foncier","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : LITIGE FONCIER \u2013 ACTION EN EXPULSION DU NON PROPRIETAIRE \u2013 IRRECEVABLE La propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse est inscrite aux noms des d\u00e9fendeurs au pourvoi. En d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l\u2019action en expulsion formul\u00e9e par les demandeurs au pourvoi, loin d\u2019avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d\u2019appel en a fait une exacte application. Cassation...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 - Litige foncier - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T15:11:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-juillet-2018-952-13-co-n-327-litige-foncier\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 juillet 2018, 952\/13-CO n\u00b0 327 &#8211; Litige foncier"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/784541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=784541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=784541"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=784541"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=784541"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=784541"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=784541"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=784541"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=784541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}