{"id":789780,"date":"2026-04-30T22:56:51","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T20:56:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T22:56:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T20:56:51","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : \u00c9tat Malagasy et SEPST \u2013 action conjointe et solidaire<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019\u00c9tat Malagasy est partie prenante conjointement et solidairement avec le SEPST quand bien m\u00eame celui-ci jouit d\u2019une autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Sociale<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARRET N\u00b0249 du 18 mai 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier n\u00b0984\/11-SOC<\/p>\n<p>\u00c9TAT MALAGASY ET SEPST \u2013 ACTION CONJOINTE ET SOLIDAIRE<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab L\u2019\u00c9tat Malagasy est partie prenante conjointement et solidairement avec le SEPST quand bien m\u00eame celui-ci jouit d\u2019une autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>AU NOM DU PEUPLE MALAGASY<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi dix-huit mai deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de l &#039; Etat Malagasy contre l &#039; arr\u00eat n\u00b0166 du 05 Mai 2011 rendu par la Chambre Sociale de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo dans la proc\u00e9dure qui l\u2019oppose \u00e0 R.K.L. ;<\/p>\n<p> Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande,<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi n\u00b02004-036 du 1er Octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant pour violation de la loi et exc\u00e8s de pouvoir,<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a confirm\u00e9 les jugements n0931 \u00e0 941,943 \u00e0 959, 961 \u00e0 963 du 20 Septembre 2006 en toutes ses dispositions et a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 l &#039; Etat Malagasy de sa demande de mise hors de cause, alors que les motifs du premier juge sont non fond\u00e9s et parfaitement contestables en ce que :<\/p>\n<p>-le licenciement collectif des personnels du SEPST a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00fb uniquement \u00e0 la suppression de son financement par la Banque Mondiale qui a rendu impossible la continuit\u00e9 du contrat de travail ;<\/p>\n<p>-l\u2019article 1 alin\u00e9a 1 du d\u00e9cret n\u00b02002-1278 portant cr\u00e9ation, organisation et fonctionnement du Secr\u00e9tariat Ex\u00e9cutif du Programme Sectoriel Transport (SEPST) pr\u00e9cise bien l\u2019autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re du SEPS qui est lui-m\u00eame gestionnaire de ses cr\u00e9dits,<\/p>\n<p>La Cour d\u2019Appel aurait d\u00fb en prendre acte et ainsi faire droit \u00e0 la demande de mise hors de cause de l&#039;Etat Malagasy,<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019il est reproch\u00e9 \u00e0 l &#039; arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 d\u2019avoir confirm\u00e9 les jugements entrepris et d\u2019avoir d\u00e9bout\u00e9 l\u2019Etat Malagasy de sa demande de mise hors de cause ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que pour d\u00e9cider ainsi, la Cour d\u2019Appel a \u00e9nonc\u00e9 que : \u00ab l &#039; appel de l\u2019Etat Malagasy se limite \u00e0 sa demande de mise hors de cause aux motifs que le SEPST est un organisme jouissant de l &#039; autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le SEPST est sous la tutelle technique conjointe du Minist\u00e8re des Transports et de la M\u00e9t\u00e9orologique et du Minist\u00e8re des Travaux Publics, et sous la tutelle financi\u00e8re du Minist\u00e8re charg\u00e9 des Finances (article I er du d\u00e9cret 1102002-1278 portant cr\u00e9ation, organisation et fonctionnement du Secr\u00e9tariat Ex\u00e9cutif du Programme Sectoriel Transport)<\/p>\n<p>Qu&#039;il en r\u00e9sulte que le SEPST n\u2019est que le repr\u00e9sentant desdits Minist\u00e8res et partant de l&#039;Etat Malagasy, dans s la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure,<\/p>\n<p>Que cette repr\u00e9sentation est confirm\u00e9e \u00e0 titre d&#039;exemple par le contrat n\u00b0235-SEPST\/VPM du 06 Octobre 2003 o\u00f9 il est sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 : \u00ab le pr\u00e9sent contrat est conclu le 06 Octobre 2003 par et entre le Vice Premier Ministre charg\u00e9 des programmes \u00e9conomiques, Ministre des Transports, des Travaux Publics et de l &#039; Am\u00e9nagement du Territoire repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le Secr\u00e9tariat Ex\u00e9cutif du Programme Sectoriel des Transports ( le client) ayant son Etablissement principal rue Jules Ranaivo, Anosy BP V5\u00d64 Antananarivo Madagascar&#8230; \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Que d\u00e8s lors, l&#039;Etat Malagasy est partie prenante conjointement et solidairement avec le SEPS T quand bien m\u00eame celui-ci jouit d\u2019une autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re, dans la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en l &#039; \u00e9tat de ces \u00e9nonciations, loin d\u2019avoir viol\u00e9 la loi, la Cour d\u2019Appel en a fait une exacte application ;<\/p>\n<p>D&#039;o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9 par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFED503\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFED503\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : \u00c9tat Malagasy et SEPST \u2013 action conjointe et solidaire L\u2019\u00c9tat Malagasy est partie prenante conjointement et solidairement avec le SEPST quand bien m\u00eame celui-ci jouit d\u2019une autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet ARRET N\u00b0249 du 18 mai 2018 Dossier n\u00b0984\/11-SOC \u00c9TAT MALAGASY ET SEPST \u2013&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[9682,8424,48966,50065,50066],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-789780","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-action","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-malagasy","kji_keyword-sepst","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mots cl\u00e9s : \u00c9tat Malagasy et SEPST \u2013 action conjointe et solidaire L\u2019\u00c9tat Malagasy est partie prenante conjointement et solidairement avec le SEPST quand bien m\u00eame celui-ci jouit d\u2019une autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet ARRET N\u00b0249 du 18 mai 2018 Dossier n\u00b0984\/11-SOC \u00c9TAT MALAGASY ET SEPST \u2013...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\\\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T20:56:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\\\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249","og_description":"Mots cl\u00e9s : \u00c9tat Malagasy et SEPST \u2013 action conjointe et solidaire L\u2019\u00c9tat Malagasy est partie prenante conjointement et solidairement avec le SEPST quand bien m\u00eame celui-ci jouit d\u2019une autonomie administrative et financi\u00e8re. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet ARRET N\u00b0249 du 18 mai 2018 Dossier n\u00b0984\/11-SOC \u00c9TAT MALAGASY ET SEPST \u2013...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T20:56:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-984-11-soc-n-249\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 984\/11-SOC n\u00b0 249"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/789780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=789780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=789780"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=789780"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=789780"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=789780"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=789780"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=789780"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=789780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}