{"id":789781,"date":"2026-04-30T22:56:53","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T20:56:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T22:56:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T20:56:53","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 – Qualit\u00e9 pour agir"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : D\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 \u2013 absence de mandat \u2013 Irrecevable<\/p>\n

L\u2019appelant n\u2019a aucun mandat pour justifier sa qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 repr\u00e9senter la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. L'appel est irrecevable<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Sociale<\/p>\n

Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 247 du 18 mai 2018<\/p>\n

Dossier : N\u00b0580\/11-SOC<\/p>\n

D\u00c9FAUT DE QUALIT\u00c9 \u2013 ABSENCE DE MANDAT \u2013 IRRECEVABLE<\/p>\n

\u00ab L\u2019appelant n\u2019a aucun mandat pour justifier sa qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 repr\u00e9senter la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. Appel irrecevable \u00bb<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi dix-huit mai deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit:<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi:<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 XXX sise \u00e0 [adresse], ayant pour conseil Maitre Arlette Rafanomadio avocat contre arr\u00eat n\u00b027 du 24 Mars 2011 rendu par la Chambre Sociale de la Cour d' Appel de Toamasina dans la proc\u00e9dure qui l'oppose \u00e0 D.E.;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande :<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique de cassation pris de la violation des articles 4 et 17 de l\u2019ordonnance n\u00b060-120 du 1\u00ba Octobre 1960 d\u00e9terminant la proc\u00e9dure devant les juridictions de travail ;<\/p>\n

En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par A.M.J., pour d\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 en l\u2019absence d'un mandat \u00e9crit alors que c'est au greffier en chef qui a enregistr\u00e9 la d\u00e9claration et d\u00e9livr\u00e9 le certificat d\u2019appel qui l\u2019a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 le mandat en bonne et du forme ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la d\u00e9claration d\u2019appel du 19 Mars 2010 a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite par A.M.J. et aucun mandat \u00e9crit pour repr\u00e9senter la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 XXX ne figure dans le dossier pour justifier sa qualit\u00e9:<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant comme elle l\u2019a fait, en d\u00e9clarant irrecevable l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par A.M.J., la Cour d' Appel a bien appliqu\u00e9 la loi:<\/p>\n

Que le moyen ne saurait \u00eatre accueilli<\/p>\n

REJETTE le pourvoi<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois elan que dessus.<\/p>\n

Ou \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : D\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 \u2013 absence de mandat \u2013 Irrecevable L\u2019appelant n\u2019a aucun mandat pour justifier sa qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 repr\u00e9senter la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. L’appel est irrecevable Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 247 du 18 mai 2018 Dossier : N\u00b0580\/11-SOC D\u00c9FAUT DE QUALIT\u00c9 \u2013 ABSENCE DE…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,48966,48968,23112],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-789781","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-qualite","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 - Qualit\u00e9 pour agir - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 - Qualit\u00e9 pour agir\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : D\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 \u2013 absence de mandat \u2013 Irrecevable L\u2019appelant n\u2019a aucun mandat pour justifier sa qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 repr\u00e9senter la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. L'appel est irrecevable Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 247 du 18 mai 2018 Dossier : N\u00b0580\/11-SOC D\u00c9FAUT DE QUALIT\u00c9 \u2013 ABSENCE DE...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\\\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 - Qualit\u00e9 pour agir - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T20:56:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\\\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 – Qualit\u00e9 pour agir\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 - Qualit\u00e9 pour agir - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 - Qualit\u00e9 pour agir","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : D\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 \u2013 absence de mandat \u2013 Irrecevable L\u2019appelant n\u2019a aucun mandat pour justifier sa qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 repr\u00e9senter la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. L'appel est irrecevable Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 247 du 18 mai 2018 Dossier : N\u00b0580\/11-SOC D\u00c9FAUT DE QUALIT\u00c9 \u2013 ABSENCE DE...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 - Qualit\u00e9 pour agir - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T20:56:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-18-mai-2018-580-11-soc-n-247-qualite-pour-agir\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 18 mai 2018, 580\/11-SOC n\u00b0 247 – Qualit\u00e9 pour agir"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/789781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=789781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=789781"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=789781"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=789781"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=789781"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=789781"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=789781"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=789781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}