{"id":790931,"date":"2026-04-30T23:56:53","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T21:56:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T23:56:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T21:56:53","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 &#8211; Interpr\u00e9tation d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision judiciaire"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Interpr\u00e9tation d\u2019une d\u00e9cision \u2013 signification &#8211; pouvoir souverain &#8211; juge de fond<\/p>\n<p>Il appartient au juge du fond saisi d\u2019une demande en interpr\u00e9tation de donner la signification qui lui parait justifi\u00e9 aux dispositions obscures de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 207 du 4 mai 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 494\/07-CO<\/p>\n<p>INTERPR\u00c9TATION D\u2019UNE D\u00c9CISION \u2013 SIGNIFICATION &#8211; POUVOIR SOUVERAIN &#8211; JUGE DE FOND<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Il appartient au juge du fond saisi d\u2019une demande en interpr\u00e9tation de donner la signification qui lui para\u00eet justifi\u00e9 aux dispositions obscures de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Cour de Cassation<\/p>\n<p>Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi quatre mai deux mille dix-huit, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi en date du 09 Octobre 2007 de R.N. demeurant [adresse], \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de ses conseils Ma\u00eetres Solofolalao RAKOTOMALALA et Fiankinana ANDRIANASOLO, Avocats, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0180 rendu le 04 Juillet 2007 par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Fianarantsoa dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 M.L.L.S. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p>SUR LE PREMIER MOYEN DE CASSATION EN SES TROIS BRANCHES : tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 26 de la Loi Organique n\u00b02004-036 du 1er Octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pour violation de l\u2019article 183.3 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile, pour incomp\u00e9tence, fausse application et interpr\u00e9tation dudit article et d\u00e9naturation des faits ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que : la Cour d\u2019Appel a retenu sa comp\u00e9tence pour interpr\u00e9ter de nouveau les arr\u00eats n\u00b0347 du 27 Juin 2001 et n\u00b072 du 05 Mars 2003 ;<\/p>\n<p>Alors que : ce dernier arr\u00eat a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019un pourvoi en cassation (n\u00b0346\/03-CO) ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que : l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a ajout\u00e9 que la restitution de la somme de 50.000.000 Fmg s\u2019av\u00e8re sans objet ;<\/p>\n<p>Alors que : la Cour d\u2019Appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d\u2019une requ\u00eate en interpr\u00e9tation, c&#039;est-\u00e0-dire qu\u2019elle est suppos\u00e9e donner son avis et \u00e9claircissement sur les points obscurs de la d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que : la Cour d\u2019Appel rel\u00e8ve M.L du remboursement de la somme de 50.000.000 Fmg sur un compte en banque ;<\/p>\n<p>Alors qu\u2019\u00e0 aucun moment, toutes les d\u00e9cisions : jugement, arr\u00eat principal et arr\u00eat interpr\u00e9tatif n\u2019avaient sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 que le remboursement de cette somme doit se faire \u00e0 partir d\u2019un compte bancaire cl\u00f4tur\u00e9 par la Cour ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019il appartient au Juge du fond saisi d\u2019une demande en interpr\u00e9tation de donner la signification qui lui para\u00eet \u00eatre \u00e9vidente aux dispositions obscures de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Que le moyen tendant \u00e0 remettre en cause ce pouvoir souverain, \u00e9chappant au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation, ne saurait \u00eatre accueilli ;<\/p>\n<p>SUR LE DEUXIEME MOYEN DE CASSATION, pour violation de l\u2019article 05 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que : la Cour d\u2019Appel a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que le remboursement de la somme de 50.000.000 Fmg est devenu sans objet ;<\/p>\n<p>Alors qu\u2019aucune des parties, m\u00eame la d\u00e9fenderesse en interpr\u00e9tation, n\u2019a demand\u00e9 \u00e0 ce que ce remboursement lui soit relev\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la Cour d\u2019Appel, pour statuer sur la susdite somme, n\u2019a fait que tirer de son interpr\u00e9tation des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause les cons\u00e9quences qui lui paraissent devoir s\u2019imposer ;<\/p>\n<p>Que ce moyen n\u2019est donc, pas fond\u00e9 et doit \u00eatre rejet\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le demandeur au pourvoi \u00e0 l\u2019indemnit\u00e9, \u00e0 l\u2019amende de cassation et aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>Appel\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du premier d\u00e9cembre deux mille dix-sept, o\u00f9 l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 renvoy\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019audience du deux f\u00e9vrier deux mille dix- huit, mise en d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019audience du six avril deux mille dix- huit ; d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 rabattu pour autre composition de la Cour et remise en d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019audience du quatre mai deux mille dix- huit avec la nouvelle composition ;<\/p>\n<p>Lu publiquement \u00e0 l\u2019audience du quatre mai deux mille dix- huit ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFEC8A3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFEC8A3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Interpr\u00e9tation d\u2019une d\u00e9cision \u2013 signification &#8211; pouvoir souverain &#8211; juge de fond Il appartient au juge du fond saisi d\u2019une demande en interpr\u00e9tation de donner la signification qui lui parait justifi\u00e9 aux dispositions obscures de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,15489,7950,48966,48968],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-790931","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-interpretation","kji_keyword-judiciaire","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 - Interpr\u00e9tation d&#039;une d\u00e9cision judiciaire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 - Interpr\u00e9tation d&#039;une d\u00e9cision judiciaire\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Interpr\u00e9tation d\u2019une d\u00e9cision \u2013 signification - pouvoir souverain - juge de fond Il appartient au juge du fond saisi d\u2019une demande en interpr\u00e9tation de donner la signification qui lui parait justifi\u00e9 aux dispositions obscures de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\\\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 - Interpr\u00e9tation d'une d\u00e9cision judiciaire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T21:56:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\\\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 &#8211; Interpr\u00e9tation d&rsquo;une d\u00e9cision judiciaire\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 - Interpr\u00e9tation d'une d\u00e9cision judiciaire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 - Interpr\u00e9tation d'une d\u00e9cision judiciaire","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Interpr\u00e9tation d\u2019une d\u00e9cision \u2013 signification - pouvoir souverain - juge de fond Il appartient au juge du fond saisi d\u2019une demande en interpr\u00e9tation de donner la signification qui lui parait justifi\u00e9 aux dispositions obscures de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 - Interpr\u00e9tation d'une d\u00e9cision judiciaire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T21:56:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-mai-2018-494-07-co-n-207-interpretation-dune-decision-judiciaire\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 mai 2018, 494\/07-CO n\u00b0 207 &#8211; Interpr\u00e9tation d&rsquo;une d\u00e9cision judiciaire"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/790931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=790931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=790931"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=790931"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=790931"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=790931"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=790931"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=790931"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=790931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}