{"id":792159,"date":"2026-05-01T00:56:38","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:56:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T00:56:38","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:56:38","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 &#8211; Tierce opposition"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition \u2013 Recevabilit\u00e9 \u2013 D\u00e9lai de recours \u2013 Point de d\u00e9part<\/p>\n<p>Pour se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la tierce opposition, la Cour est tenue d\u2019appliquer les dispositions de l\u2019article 436 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile l\u2019obligeant \u00e0 conna\u00eetre la date exacte \u00e0 laquelle le tiers opposant a eu connaissance de la d\u00e9cision lui faisant grief et au lieu de recourir \u00e0 l\u2019application de l\u2019article 479 de m\u00eame code (publication par extrait dans un journal).<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 187 du 24 avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 99\/07-CO<\/p>\n<p>TIERCE OPPOSITION \u2013 RECEVABILIT\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9LAI DE RECOURS \u2013 POINT DE D\u00c9PART<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Pour se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la tierce opposition, la Cour est tenue d\u2019appliquer les dispositions de l\u2019article 436 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile l\u2019obligeant \u00e0 conna\u00eetre la date exacte \u00e0 laquelle le tiers opposant a eu connaissance de la d\u00e9cision lui faisant grief et au lieu de recourir \u00e0 l\u2019application de l\u2019article 479 de m\u00eame code (publication par extrait dans un journal). \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>R.S. et consorts<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Cour de Cassation<\/p>\n<p>Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi vingt-quatre avril deux mille dix-huit, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.S. et consorts, tous demeurant \u00e0 [adresse] , ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre RAMANASE Charlotte, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude dudit conseil, 29, Rue de Russie Isoraka Antananarivo, dans la proc\u00e9dure qui les oppose \u00e0 R.H.P. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9plique, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 17 septembre 2007 par Ma\u00eetre RAMANASE est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26-2 de la loi n\u00b0 2004-036 du 1er octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame, pris de la violation des articles 184 al.3 et 436 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile, pour fausse interpr\u00e9tation de la loi, en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a infirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris aux motifs que celui-ci aurait d\u00fb \u00eatre rendu par d\u00e9faut \u00e0 l\u2019encontre du requis, alors que l\u2019article 184 al.3 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile dispose que si le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019est pas touch\u00e9 personnellement par la convocation, ni assign\u00e9 \u00e0 personne et que si la d\u00e9cision est susceptible d\u2019appel, il est statu\u00e9 \u00e0 son \u00e9gard par un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire ; que le moyen est ainsi fond\u00e9 (premi\u00e8re branche) ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu certes qu\u2019en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, R.H.P. n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9 personnellement par une convocation, ni assign\u00e9 \u00e0 personne et le jugement le concernant est susceptible d\u2019appel, et qu\u2019en principe c\u2019est l\u2019article 184 al.3 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile qui s\u2019applique ; que toutefois, cette irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 bien que fond\u00e9e, est sans int\u00e9r\u00eat pour les demandeurs pour constituer un cas d\u2019ouverture \u00e0 Cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu au m\u00e9pris de l\u2019article 436 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile (deuxi\u00e8me branche) ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a, pour d\u00e9clarer irrecevable la tierce opposition des consorts R.S., retenu d\u2019une part, \u00ab que l\u2019affirmation selon laquelle les tiers opposant ont en connaissance de la d\u00e9cision en question le 22 ao\u00fbt 2003, n\u2019est pas prouv\u00e9e \u00bb, et d\u2019autre part que \u00ab le jugement n\u00b0 3135, objet de la tierce opposition, ayant d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9 dans un journal, est cens\u00e9 \u00eatre connu de tout le monde \u00ab erga omnes \u00bb et qu\u2019il y est pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu\u2019aucune opposition ne sera recevable pass\u00e9 le d\u00e9lai de un mois \u00bb ; que cependant, pour se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la tierce opposition, pour ce qui est de la condition de d\u00e9lai de recours indiqu\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019article 436 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile dont ladite Cour est tenue d\u2019appliquer, elle se devait de connaitre la date exacte \u00e0 laquelle le tiers opposant a eu connaissance de la d\u00e9cision lui faisant grief et non de recourir \u00e0 l\u2019application de l\u2019article 479 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile qui ne r\u00e9pond aucunement \u00e0 la solution demand\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Que le moyen en sa deuxi\u00e8me branche est fond\u00e9 ; que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 encourt la Cassation sans qu\u2019il soit besoin d\u2019examiner le second moyen soulev\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 1378 du 24 octobre 2006 de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ordonne restitution de l\u2019amende ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le d\u00e9fendeur aux d\u00e9pens. <\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFEBF36\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFEBF36\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition \u2013 Recevabilit\u00e9 \u2013 D\u00e9lai de recours \u2013 Point de d\u00e9part Pour se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la tierce opposition, la Cour est tenue d\u2019appliquer les dispositions de l\u2019article 436 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile l\u2019obligeant \u00e0 conna\u00eetre la date exacte \u00e0 laquelle le tiers opposant a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,48966,50475,44421],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-792159","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-opposition","kji_keyword-tierce","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 - Tierce opposition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition \u2013 Recevabilit\u00e9 \u2013 D\u00e9lai de recours \u2013 Point de d\u00e9part Pour se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la tierce opposition, la Cour est tenue d\u2019appliquer les dispositions de l\u2019article 436 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile l\u2019obligeant \u00e0 conna\u00eetre la date exacte \u00e0 laquelle le tiers opposant a...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\\\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T22:56:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\\\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 &#8211; Tierce opposition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 - Tierce opposition","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition \u2013 Recevabilit\u00e9 \u2013 D\u00e9lai de recours \u2013 Point de d\u00e9part Pour se prononcer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la tierce opposition, la Cour est tenue d\u2019appliquer les dispositions de l\u2019article 436 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile l\u2019obligeant \u00e0 conna\u00eetre la date exacte \u00e0 laquelle le tiers opposant a...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T22:56:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-99-07-co-n-187-tierce-opposition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 99\/07-CO n\u00b0 187 &#8211; Tierce opposition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/792159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=792159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=792159"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=792159"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=792159"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=792159"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=792159"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=792159"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=792159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}