{"id":792171,"date":"2026-05-01T00:56:58","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:56:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T00:56:58","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:56:58","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 &#8211; Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire et artistique \u2013 Reproduction d\u2019une \u0153uvre \u2013 Similitude ou identit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juge du fond<\/p>\n<p>La reproduction de l\u2019\u0153uvre n\u2019est pas suffisamment \u00e9tablie du fait de l\u2019absence de similitude ou identit\u00e9 de phrases dans les deux \u0153uvres et la diff\u00e9rence dans la formulation des id\u00e9es et des m\u00e9thodes ne se pr\u00eate pas \u00e0 confusion.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARRET N\u00b0177 du 20 Avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier n\u00b0504\/08-CO<\/p>\n<p>PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 LITT\u00c9RAIRE ET ARTISTIQUE \u2013 REPRODUCTION D\u2019UNE \u0152UVRE \u2013 SIMILITUDE OU IDENTIT\u00c9 \u2013 APPR\u00c9CIATION \u2013 JUGE DU FOND<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab La reproduction de l\u2019\u0153uvre n\u2019est pas suffisamment \u00e9tablie du fait de l\u2019absence de similitude ou identit\u00e9 de phrases dans les deux \u0153uvres et la diff\u00e9rence dans la formulation des id\u00e9es et des m\u00e9thodes ne se pr\u00eate pas \u00e0 confusion. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>L&#039;Association M.J.<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>AU NOM DU PEUPLE MALAGASY<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi vingt avril deux mille dix huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.M. demeurant \u00e0 [adresse], \u00e9lisant domicile en l&#039;\u00e9tude de Maitre Paul Joseph RAKOTOARISON, Avocat, contre l&#039;arr\u00eat n\u00b01293 du 24 septembre 2007 rendu par la chambre civile de la Cour d&#039;Appel d&#039;Antananarivo dans le litige l&#039;opposant \u00e0 l&#039;Association M.J. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 de l&#039;article 26 al.2 de la loi organique n\u00b02004-036 du 1eroctobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame, pour fausse interpr\u00e9tation de la loi n\u00b096-036 du 9 d\u00e9cembre 1994 En ce que la Cour d&#039;Appel a confirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris aux motifs que les preuves apport\u00e9es sont insuffisantes Alors que le litige se rapportant non pas au droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 industrielle mais au droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire et artistique r\u00e9gi par la loi n\u00b094-036 du 09 d\u00e9cembre 1994 pr\u00e9voit que seul l&#039;auteur d&#039;une \u0153uvre de l&#039;esprit dispose du droit de publication de son \u0153uvre m\u00eame si elle n&#039;est pas achev\u00e9e ; Que l&#039; Association M.J. pr\u00e9tend \u00e0 tort la paternit\u00e9 de l&#039;\u0153uvre du demandeur intitul\u00e9e \u00ab comment r\u00e9ussir brillamment ses \u00e9tudes \u00bb de laquelle elle en a tir\u00e9 profit par la vente de mille exemplaires de la brochure.<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le moyen reproche \u00e0 la Cour d&#039;Appel d&#039;avoir confirm\u00e9 \u00e0 tort le jugement entrepris qui a confondu le droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 industriel avec le droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire et artistique se rapportant au cas d\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l&#039;association M.J. ayant publi\u00e9 et vendu plusieurs exemplaires de la brochure \u00ab Comment r\u00e9ussir ses \u00e9tudes \u00bb laquelle n&#039;est qu&#039;une reproduction de l&#039;\u0153uvre du demandeur R.M. intitul\u00e9e \u00ab Comment r\u00e9ussir brillamment ses \u00e9tudes \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la Cour d\u2019Appel, pour asseoir sa d\u00e9cision, a d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 dans ses motifs que la reproduction de l&#039;\u0153uvre par M.J. n&#039;est pas suffisamment \u00e9tablie du fait de l&#039;absence de similitude ou d&#039;identit\u00e9 des phrases dans les deux \u0153uvres et par la diff\u00e9rence dans la formulation des id\u00e9es et des m\u00e9thodes ne pouvant pr\u00eater \u00e0 confusion ;<\/p>\n<p>Que le moyen tentant de remettre en cause l&#039;appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des faits par les juges de fond est inop\u00e9rant ;<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le demandeur \u00e0 l&#039;amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale, en son audience publique, les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur, et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFEB55B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFEB55B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire et artistique \u2013 Reproduction d\u2019une \u0153uvre \u2013 Similitude ou identit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juge du fond La reproduction de l\u2019\u0153uvre n\u2019est pas suffisamment \u00e9tablie du fait de l\u2019absence de similitude ou identit\u00e9 de phrases dans les deux \u0153uvres et la diff\u00e9rence dans la formulation des id\u00e9es&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,50506,48966,50505],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-792171","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-contrefacon","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-originalite","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 - Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 - Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire et artistique \u2013 Reproduction d\u2019une \u0153uvre \u2013 Similitude ou identit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juge du fond La reproduction de l\u2019\u0153uvre n\u2019est pas suffisamment \u00e9tablie du fait de l\u2019absence de similitude ou identit\u00e9 de phrases dans les deux \u0153uvres et la diff\u00e9rence dans la formulation des id\u00e9es...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\\\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 - Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T22:56:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\\\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 &#8211; Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 - Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 - Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litt\u00e9raire et artistique \u2013 Reproduction d\u2019une \u0153uvre \u2013 Similitude ou identit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juge du fond La reproduction de l\u2019\u0153uvre n\u2019est pas suffisamment \u00e9tablie du fait de l\u2019absence de similitude ou identit\u00e9 de phrases dans les deux \u0153uvres et la diff\u00e9rence dans la formulation des id\u00e9es...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 - Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T22:56:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-20-avril-2018-504-08-co-n-177-originalite-et-contrefacon-doeuvre\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 20 avril 2018, 504\/08-CO n\u00b0 177 &#8211; Originalit\u00e9 et contrefa\u00e7on d\u2019\u0153uvre"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/792171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=792171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=792171"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=792171"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=792171"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=792171"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=792171"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=792171"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=792171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}