{"id":793138,"date":"2026-05-01T01:55:38","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T01:55:38","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:38","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 &#8211; Partage des biens"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Concubinage<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Union libre \u2013 concubinage adult\u00e9rin \u2013 partage des biens \u2013 ordre public et bonnes m\u0153urs \u2013 violation<\/p>\n<p>Doit \u00eatre cass\u00e9, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui a viol\u00e9 l\u2019ordre public et les bonnes m\u0153urs en reconnaissant l\u2019existence d\u2019une union libre entre une femme et un concubin adult\u00e8re, et en ordonnant le partage des biens propres de la concubine.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 128 du 6 avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier N\u00b0903\/10-CO<\/p>\n<p>UNION LIBRE \u2013 CONCUBINAGE ADULTERIN \u2013 PARTAGE DES BIENS \u2013 ORDRE PUBLIC ET BONNES M\u0152URS \u2013 VIOLATION<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Doit \u00eatre cass\u00e9, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui a viol\u00e9 l\u2019ordre public et les bonnes m\u0153urs en reconnaissant l\u2019existence d\u2019une union libre entre une femme et un concubin adult\u00e8re, et en ordonnant le partage des biens propres de la concubine. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION CHAMBRE CIVILE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi six avril deux mille dix huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit:<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de K.I. demeurant \u00e0 [adresse] contre 1&#039; arr\u00eat n\u00b0372 du 15 Septembre 2010 rendu par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Mahajanga dans la proc\u00e9dure qui l&#039;oppose \u00e0 A.M. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p> Sur le moyen unique de cassation pris en ses trois branches tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 26 alin\u00e9a 2,3 et 6 de la loi organique n\u00b02004-036 du 1er Octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant pour fausse application ou fausse interpr\u00e9tation, exc\u00e8s de pouvoir, absence, insuffisance et contradiction de motifs et g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement 1&#039; impossibilit\u00e9 pour la Cour de Cassation d\u2019exercer son contr\u00f4le ;<\/p>\n<p>-En ce que la Cour d&#039; Appel a rendu sa d\u00e9cision sur une simple assertion de Armand Michel d\u00e9clarant que le couple vivait ensemble durant 16 ans, qu&#039; importe si l&#039; union est passag\u00e8re et durant cette union, des biens ont \u00e9t\u00e9 acquis ensemble, A.M. \u00e9tait instituteur et K.I commer\u00e7ante, alors qu&#039; elle n&#039;a pas pris en consid\u00e9ration que A.M. a commis un adult\u00e8re, a quitt\u00e9 son foyer et s&#039; est install\u00e9 chez K.I.. une commer\u00e7ante de bonne situation ce qui prouve que les biens propres de cette derni\u00e8res; (1\u00e8re branche)<\/p>\n<p> -En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a infirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris alors qu\u2019en premi\u00e8re instance K.I. a rapport\u00e9 toutes les preuves \u00e0 l\u2019origine de ses biens et que le pavillon appartenant \u00e0 la Commune n\u2019pas susceptible de partager entre les parties ( 2\u00e8me branches)<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour a dit que les biens \u00e9num\u00e9r\u00e9s dans la requ\u00eate constituent des biens de la communaut\u00e9 alors que le premier juge a d\u00e9j\u00e0 appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 toutes les preuves \u00e0 l\u2019origine desdits biens rapport\u00e9es par K.I.; (3tme branche);<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que pour infirmer le jugement entrepris la Cour d\u2019Appel a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que A.M. et K.I. ont v\u00e9cu ensemble durant 16 ans qu\u2019importe si elle \u00e9tait concubine ou sipa c&#039;est-\u00e0-dire passag\u00e8re mais durant cette union des biens ont \u00e9t\u00e9 acquis ensemble ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que les pr\u00e9tentions de A.M. sont fortement contest\u00e9es par K.I. tant sur l\u2019existence de 1&#039; association de fait que sur l\u2019acquisition des biens ;<\/p>\n<p> Attendu que K.I. a soulev\u00e9 que sa relation avec Armand Michel n\u2019est que passag\u00e8re Attendu qu\u2019il est constant et non contest\u00e9 que A.M. \u00e9tait encore mari\u00e9 l\u00e9gitimement avec une autre femme ;<\/p>\n<p>Que d\u00e8s lors, en se pr\u00e9valant de l\u2019existence d\u2019un lien de concubinage entre lui et K.I., A.M. tente en vain de faire prot\u00e9ger une relation de concubinage entach\u00e9e d\u2019adult\u00e8re, situation qui est contraire \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public et aux bonnes m\u0153urs ;<\/p>\n<p>D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit, qu\u2019en statuant comme il l\u2019a fait, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 encourt la cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0372 du 15 Septembre 2010 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Mahajanga Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le d\u00e9fendeur aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE9011\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE9011\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Concubinage Mots cl\u00e9s : Union libre \u2013 concubinage adult\u00e9rin \u2013 partage des biens \u2013 ordre public et bonnes m\u0153urs \u2013 violation Doit \u00eatre cass\u00e9, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui a viol\u00e9 l\u2019ordre public et les bonnes m\u0153urs en reconnaissant l\u2019existence d\u2019une union libre entre une femme et un concubin adult\u00e8re, et en ordonnant le partage des&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,50731,8424,48966,50730],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-793138","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-biens","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-partage","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 - Partage des biens - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 - Partage des biens\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Concubinage Mots cl\u00e9s : Union libre \u2013 concubinage adult\u00e9rin \u2013 partage des biens \u2013 ordre public et bonnes m\u0153urs \u2013 violation Doit \u00eatre cass\u00e9, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui a viol\u00e9 l\u2019ordre public et les bonnes m\u0153urs en reconnaissant l\u2019existence d\u2019une union libre entre une femme et un concubin adult\u00e8re, et en ordonnant le partage des...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\\\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 - Partage des biens - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T23:55:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\\\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 &#8211; Partage des biens\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 - Partage des biens - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 - Partage des biens","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Concubinage Mots cl\u00e9s : Union libre \u2013 concubinage adult\u00e9rin \u2013 partage des biens \u2013 ordre public et bonnes m\u0153urs \u2013 violation Doit \u00eatre cass\u00e9, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui a viol\u00e9 l\u2019ordre public et les bonnes m\u0153urs en reconnaissant l\u2019existence d\u2019une union libre entre une femme et un concubin adult\u00e8re, et en ordonnant le partage des...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 - Partage des biens - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T23:55:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-903-10-co-n-128-partage-des-biens-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 903\/10-CO n\u00b0 128 &#8211; Partage des biens"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/793138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=793138"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=793138"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=793138"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=793138"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=793138"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=793138"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=793138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}