{"id":793140,"date":"2026-05-01T01:55:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T01:55:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:41","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 &#8211; Repr\u00e9sentation en justice"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Repr\u00e9sentation en justice \u2013 Avocat \u2013 conditions<\/p>\n<p>Le mandat donn\u00e9 \u00e0 un avocat par un seul h\u00e9ritier qui n\u2019a pas re\u00e7u une procuration \u00e9manant de tous les coh\u00e9ritiers, est inop\u00e9rant.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 127 du 6 avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier N\u00b0131\/10-CO<\/p>\n<p>REPRESENTATION EN JUSTICE \u2013 AVOCAT \u2013 CONDITIONS<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Le mandat donn\u00e9 \u00e0 un avocat par un seul h\u00e9ritier qui n\u2019a pas re\u00e7u une procuration \u00e9manant de tous les coh\u00e9ritiers, est inop\u00e9rant. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION CHAMBRE CIVILE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi six avril deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit:<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.J., R.A.G, R.H.M., R.G., Ran.J, Rnlr J, Rkt J tous h\u00e9ritiers de R.JN. \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de leur conseil Ma\u00eetre Norbert Rakotonirina avocat exer\u00e7ant au lot 635 bis LC Ambatomaro Antsobolo Antananarivo, contre Gamma arr\u00eat n\u00b0429 du 25 novembre 2009 rendu par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Fianarantsoa dans la proc\u00e9dure qui les oppose \u00e0 R.P. et R.M.;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 25 et 26 de la loi organique n\u00b02004-036 du 1er Octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame et pris de la violation de l\u2019article 11 du Code de proc\u00e9dure Civile ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 recevable l\u2019exception d\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate en tierce opposition contre le jugement n\u00b0816 du 4 d\u00e9cembre 2004 au motif qu\u2019elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance dans les conclusions de R.M. d\u00e9pos\u00e9es le 15 Mai 2007 ;<\/p>\n<p> Alors que l\u2019 article 11 suscit\u00e9 pr\u00e9cise que \u00ab sous r\u00e9serves des dispositions de l&#039; article 12, toute demande de nullit\u00e9, toute fin de non-recevoir, toute exception sauf celle de communication de pi\u00e8ces, toute d\u00e9clinatoire de comp\u00e9tence, du moment qu&#039; ils ne sont pas d&#039; ordre public, sont d\u00e9clar\u00e9s non recevables s&#039; ils sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s apr\u00e8s qu\u2019 il a \u00e9t\u00e9 conclu au fond; qu&#039; en I&#039; esp\u00e8ce, la demande a \u00e9t\u00e9 dat\u00e9e du 23 Mai 2007 et enr\u00f4l\u00e9e le 25 Mai 2007, et les conclusions de R.M. datent du 15 Mai 2007 donc ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la requ\u00eate en tierce opposition;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p> Attendu qu\u2019effectivement les consorts R.M ont d\u00e9pos\u00e9 des conclusions dat\u00e9es du 15 Mai 2007 mais en r\u00e9plique \u00e0 l\u2019action de R.J tendant \u00e0 l\u2019expulsion et \u00e0 la d\u00e9molition dans une proc\u00e9dure connexe ;<\/p>\n<p> Que contrairement aux all\u00e9gations du moyen, les conclusions de R.M. et consort aux fins de d\u00e9clarer irrecevable l&#039;action en tierce opposition sont dat\u00e9es du 19 juin 2007 ;<\/p>\n<p> Que le moyen manquant en fait ne saurait \u00eatre accueilli ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le deuxi\u00e8me moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi organique n\u00b02004-036 du 1er Octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame et pris de la violation de l\u2019article 23 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile pour violation de la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d&#039; Appel a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que la preuve n&#039; est pas rapport\u00e9e que R.J., coh\u00e9riti\u00e8re de R.JN a obtenu une procuration de la part des autres coh\u00e9ritiers et de R.E ou ses h\u00e9ritiers d&#039; agir en leur nom et pour leur compte alors que l&#039; article 23 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile pr\u00e9voit que \u00ab hormis les cas pr\u00e9vus au pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent article, devant la Cour Supr\u00eame, la Cour d&#039; Appel et les tribunaux de premi\u00e8re instance, les avocats ont seul qualit\u00e9 pour plaider et repr\u00e9senter les parties; qu&#039; en l&#039; esp\u00e8ce, les h\u00e9ritiers de feux R.JN et R.E. sont repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s par leur conseil;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la seule procuration produite au dossier \u00e9mane de Ran J. qui est la s\u0153ur de R.J.; Que la preuve que les h\u00e9ritiers de R.E. ainsi que les autres co-h\u00e9ritiers de R.J. lui ont donn\u00e9 procuration pour pouvoir agir en leur nom et pour leur compte n&#039;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 rapport\u00e9e, alors que cette derni\u00e8re a besoin de cette procuration pour qu&#039; elle puisse donner \u00e0 son tour mandat \u00e0 un avocat pour repr\u00e9senter en justice tous les coh\u00e9ritiers ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, la Cour d\u2019Appel n\u2019a commis aucune violation de la loi ; Attendu que tous les moyens propos\u00e9s ne sont pas fond\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne les demandeurs \u00e0 l&#039;amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p> O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p> Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE8EC7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE8EC7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Repr\u00e9sentation en justice \u2013 Avocat \u2013 conditions Le mandat donn\u00e9 \u00e0 un avocat par un seul h\u00e9ritier qui n\u2019a pas re\u00e7u une procuration \u00e9manant de tous les coh\u00e9ritiers, est inop\u00e9rant. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 127 du 6 avril 2018 Dossier N\u00b0131\/10-CO REPRESENTATION&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,9055,48966,8268],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-793140","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-justice","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-representation","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Repr\u00e9sentation en justice \u2013 Avocat \u2013 conditions Le mandat donn\u00e9 \u00e0 un avocat par un seul h\u00e9ritier qui n\u2019a pas re\u00e7u une procuration \u00e9manant de tous les coh\u00e9ritiers, est inop\u00e9rant. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 127 du 6 avril 2018 Dossier N\u00b0131\/10-CO REPRESENTATION...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\\\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T23:55:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\\\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 &#8211; Repr\u00e9sentation en justice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Repr\u00e9sentation en justice \u2013 Avocat \u2013 conditions Le mandat donn\u00e9 \u00e0 un avocat par un seul h\u00e9ritier qui n\u2019a pas re\u00e7u une procuration \u00e9manant de tous les coh\u00e9ritiers, est inop\u00e9rant. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 127 du 6 avril 2018 Dossier N\u00b0131\/10-CO REPRESENTATION...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T23:55:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-131-10-co-n-127-representation-en-justice-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 131\/10-CO n\u00b0 127 &#8211; Repr\u00e9sentation en justice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/793140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=793140"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=793140"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=793140"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=793140"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=793140"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=793140"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=793140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}