{"id":793144,"date":"2026-05-01T01:55:46","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T01:55:46","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:46","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 &#8211; Formalit\u00e9s"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Testament<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Testament \u2013 inobservation des formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>La constatation par la Cour d\u2019Appel de l\u2019inobservation des dispositions et formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 par la loi sur le testament suffit \u00e0 justifier l\u00e9galement sa d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 122 du 6 avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier N\u00b0391\/01-CO<\/p>\n<p>TESTAMENT \u2013 INOBSERVATION DES FORMALITES PRESCRITES A PEINE DE NULLITE<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab La constatation par la Cour d\u2019Appel de l\u2019inobservation des dispositions et formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 par la loi sur le testament suffit \u00e0 justifier l\u00e9galement sa d\u00e9cision. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION CHAMBRE CIVILE<\/p>\n<p> La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi six avril deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.M. domicili\u00e9e \u00e0 [adresse], ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Solomon Randriamahafaly avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0683 du 18 Octobre 2000 rendu par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Fianarantsoa dans la proc\u00e9dure qui l\u2019oppose \u00e0 R.J.P. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur les premier et deuxi\u00e8me moyens de cassation r\u00e9unis tir\u00e9s des articles 5 et 44 de la loi n\u00b061-013 du 19 juillet 1961,180 alin\u00e9a 3, 265,332 et 437 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile, 307 et 308 de la loi sur la Th\u00e9orie G\u00e9n\u00e9rale des Obligations, 223 et 233 du Code des 305 articles, 46 de la loi n\u00b068-012 du 4 juillet 1968 relative aux Successions, testament et donation pour absence ou insuffisance de motif, manque de base l\u00e9gale, exc\u00e8s de pouvoir, pour violation de l&#039; autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e et du principe du masi-mandidy:<\/p>\n<p>En ce qu\u2019en infirmant le jugement entrepris, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a constat\u00e9 arbitrairement l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du testament secret n\u00b069\/86 du 19 d\u00e9cembre 1986, ordonn\u00e9 la distraction de la rizi\u00e8re de 50 ares objet de l\u2019acte de donation n\u00b010 du 12 d\u00e9cembre 1997 au profit de R.J.P. des biens objets du testament secret suscit\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p> Alors que la Cour d&#039; Appel s&#039; est abstenue de vider son Arr\u00eat avant-dire droit n\u00b0227 du 23 juin 1999 qui a ordonn\u00e9 une nouvelle descente sur les lieux aux fins de v\u00e9rifier l&#039; existence d&#039; un empi\u00e8tement \u00e9ventuel entre les biens vis\u00e9s aux actes de donation n\u00b010 du 12 d\u00e9cembre 1977 et 13 Mars 1978 avec ceux objet du testament n\u00b069\/86 du 19 d\u00e9cembre 1986, et s&#039; est abstenue de constater la validit\u00e9 du testament secret n\u00b069\/86 et l&#039; irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 manifeste de l&#039; acte de donation n\u00b010du 12 d\u00e9cembre 1977 produit par R.J.P.; (1er moyen)<\/p>\n<p>-En ce que l&#039; arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a constat\u00e9 arbitrairement la pr\u00e9tendue irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du testament n\u00b069\/86 du 19 d\u00e9cembre 1986, ordonn\u00e9 en cons\u00e9quence la distraction des rizi\u00e8res de 50 ares et de 30 ares objet des actes de donation n\u00b010 du 12 d\u00e9cembre 1977 et du 13 Mars 1978 au profit respectivement de R.J.P. et des \u00e9poux R.E.\/R des biens objets du testament susvis\u00e9, alors qu&#039; aucune demande incidente d&#039; inscription de faux n&#039; a \u00e9t\u00e9 formul\u00e9e par R.J.P. contre l&#039; acte authentique n\u00b001\/83 du 24 Mai 1983 portant d\u00e9p\u00f4t de testament secret fait par R.V. aupr\u00e8s de l&#039; Officier public authentificateur et notamment contre l&#039;acte n\u00b069\/86 du 19 d\u00e9cembre 1986 portant ouverture dudit testament secret; (2\u00e8me moyen)<\/p>\n<p> Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019en ex\u00e9cution de l\u2019arr\u00eat avant dire droit susvis\u00e9, l\u2019intim\u00e9e a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le cahier \u00ab travaux pratiques \u00bb servant de registre de d\u00e9p\u00f4t d\u2019Ambohimahasoa;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en statuant au fond, la Cour d\u2019Appel estime qu\u2019elle dispose des \u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour former sa conviction ;<\/p>\n<p> Attendu que contrairement aux all\u00e9gations du moyen, la Cour d\u2019Appel pour infirmer le jugement entrepris, a retenu que le testament n\u00b069\/86 du 19 d\u00e9cembre 1986 est entach\u00e9 d\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9, les documents acquis aux d\u00e9bats ne contenant pas les mentions exig\u00e9es \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 prescrites par l\u2019article 33 \u00e0 39 de la loi n\u00b068-012 du 4 juillet 1968 ;<\/p>\n<p> Que la constatation par l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 de l\u2019inobservation des dispositions et formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 par ledit article 33 suscit\u00e9 suffit \u00e0 justifier l\u00e9galement la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>D&#039;o\u00f9 il suit que les moyens ne sont pas fond\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n<p> PAR CES MOTIFS<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p> Condamne la demanderesse \u00e0 l&#039;amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p> Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE8C31\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE8C31\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Testament Mots cl\u00e9s : Testament \u2013 inobservation des formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 La constatation par la Cour d\u2019Appel de l\u2019inobservation des dispositions et formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 par la loi sur le testament suffit \u00e0 justifier l\u00e9galement sa d\u00e9cision. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,50718,48966,48968],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-793144","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-formalites","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 - Formalit\u00e9s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 - Formalit\u00e9s\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Testament Mots cl\u00e9s : Testament \u2013 inobservation des formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 La constatation par la Cour d\u2019Appel de l\u2019inobservation des dispositions et formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 par la loi sur le testament suffit \u00e0 justifier l\u00e9galement sa d\u00e9cision. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\\\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 - Formalit\u00e9s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T23:55:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\\\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 &#8211; Formalit\u00e9s\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 - Formalit\u00e9s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 - Formalit\u00e9s","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Testament Mots cl\u00e9s : Testament \u2013 inobservation des formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 La constatation par la Cour d\u2019Appel de l\u2019inobservation des dispositions et formalit\u00e9s prescrites \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 par la loi sur le testament suffit \u00e0 justifier l\u00e9galement sa d\u00e9cision. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 - Formalit\u00e9s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T23:55:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-391-01-co-n-122-formalites-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 391\/01-CO n\u00b0 122 &#8211; Formalit\u00e9s"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/793144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=793144"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=793144"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=793144"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=793144"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=793144"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=793144"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=793144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}