{"id":793146,"date":"2026-05-01T01:55:51","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T01:55:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:51","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 &#8211; Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Contrat \/ Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Cr\u00e9ance \u2013 ex\u00e9cution tardive \u2013 motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) \u2013 consid\u00e9rations de fait<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019examen des motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) causant le retard dans le paiement d\u2019une cr\u00e9ance est une consid\u00e9ration de fait relevant de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 133 du 6 avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier N\u00b0573\/14-CO<\/p>\n<p>CREANCE \u2013 EXECUTION TARDIVE \u2013 MOTIFS (CRISE ECONOMIQUE) \u2013 CONSIDERATIONS DE FAIT<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab L\u2019examen des motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) causant le retard dans le paiement d\u2019une cr\u00e9ance est une consid\u00e9ration de fait relevant de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION CHAMBRE CIVILE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi six avril deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.A.J.C. domicili\u00e9 \u00e0 [adresse] , \u00e9lisant domicile en l&#039;\u00e9tude de son conseil Ma\u00eetre Andrianony Andriambazah Malala avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0257 du 11 juin 2014 rendu par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Mahajanga dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.P.;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p> Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi n\u00b02004-036 du 1 Octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant et pris de la violation des articles 123 et 128 de la loi sur la Th\u00e9orie G\u00e9n\u00e9rale des obligations pour fausse application de la loi et contradiction de motifs ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que 1&#039; arr\u00eat a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que la date de paiement de la derni\u00e8re \u00e9ch\u00e9ance est avant la fin de l\u2019ann\u00e9e 2012, alors que le contrat de vente n&#039;a jamais stipul\u00e9 cette \u00e9ch\u00e9ance de paiement d\u2019une part et l\u2019impr\u00e9visibilit\u00e9 caus\u00e9e par le bouleversement \u00e9conomique et la crise \u00e9conomique subie par le demandeur au pourvoi entra\u00eenent le retard de paiement de la derni\u00e8re tranche d&#039;autre part ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p> Attendu que d\u2019une part la moyen pr\u00eate \u00e0 1&#039; arr\u00eat des motifs qu\u2019il ne contient pas et d\u2019autre part, le demandeur au pourvoi, en invoquant 1&#039; impr\u00e9visibilit\u00e9 caus\u00e9e par le bouleversement \u00e9conomique, se borne \u00e0 faire valoir des consid\u00e9rations de fait qui rel\u00e8vent de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et \u00e9chappent au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation<\/p>\n<p>Que le moyen ne saurait \u00eatre accueilli ;<\/p>\n<p> REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le demandeur \u00e0 l&#039;amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE9574\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE9574\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Contrat \/ Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Cr\u00e9ance \u2013 ex\u00e9cution tardive \u2013 motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) \u2013 consid\u00e9rations de fait L\u2019examen des motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) causant le retard dans le paiement d\u2019une cr\u00e9ance est une consid\u00e9ration de fait relevant de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,22253,10657,48966],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-793146","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-contrat","kji_keyword-force","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 - Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 - Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Contrat \/ Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Cr\u00e9ance \u2013 ex\u00e9cution tardive \u2013 motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) \u2013 consid\u00e9rations de fait L\u2019examen des motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) causant le retard dans le paiement d\u2019une cr\u00e9ance est une consid\u00e9ration de fait relevant de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation....\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 - Force obligatoire du contrat \\\/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T23:55:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 &#8211; Force obligatoire du contrat \\\/ Pouvoir du juge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 - Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 - Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Contrat \/ Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Cr\u00e9ance \u2013 ex\u00e9cution tardive \u2013 motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) \u2013 consid\u00e9rations de fait L\u2019examen des motifs (crise \u00e9conomique) causant le retard dans le paiement d\u2019une cr\u00e9ance est une consid\u00e9ration de fait relevant de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation....","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 - Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T23:55:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-573-14-co-n-133-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 573\/14-CO n\u00b0 133 &#8211; Force obligatoire du contrat \/ Pouvoir du juge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/793146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=793146"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=793146"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=793146"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=793146"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=793146"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=793146"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=793146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}