{"id":793150,"date":"2026-05-01T01:55:56","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T01:55:56","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:55:56","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 – Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Foncier \/ Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : Expulsion \u2013 D\u00e9molition \u2013 mesures pr\u00e9paratoires (enqu\u00eate) \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond<\/p>\n

C\u2019est \u00e0 juste titre que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019occupant et la d\u00e9molition des constructions entreprises en tirant les cons\u00e9quences juridiques de ses constatations, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019une mesure d\u2019enqu\u00eate rel\u00e8ve du pouvoir souverain des juges du fond<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n

Arret n\u00b0 131 du 6 avril 2018<\/p>\n

Dossier : N\u00b0663\/12-CO<\/p>\n

EXPULSION \u2013 DEMOLITION \u2013 MESURES PREPARATOIRES (ENQUETE) \u2013 OPPORTUNITE \u2013 APPRECIATION \u2013 JUGES DU FOND<\/p>\n

\u00ab C\u2019est \u00e0 juste titre que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019occupant et la d\u00e9molition des constructions entreprises en tirant les cons\u00e9quences juridiques de ses constatations, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019une mesure d\u2019enqu\u00eate rel\u00e8ve du pouvoir souverain des juges du fond \u00bb<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION CHAMBRE CIVILE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi six avril deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.J.C. demeurant au [adresse] , \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil Ma\u00eetre Rakotondrahanta Fanja avocat contre Gamma l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b01258 du 20 Octobre 2010 rendu par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo dans la proc\u00e9dure qui l\u2019oppose \u00e0 R.H.J;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique de cassation pris de la violation de l\u2019article 101 de la loi sur la Th\u00e9orie G\u00e9n\u00e9rale des Obligations. En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a fait de l\u2019existence d\u2019une requ\u00eate aux fins d\u2019inscription de faux pendante devant le Tribunal de Premi\u00e8re Instance 5\u00e8me Section, proc\u00e9dure n\u00b05211\/06 soulev\u00e9 par le requ\u00e9rant en cours de d\u00e9bat et le fait que R.J.C. a d\u00e9j\u00e0 achet\u00e9 la parcelle litigieuse \u00e0 R.J. ;<\/p>\n

Alors que la vente de la chose d\u2019autrui sur la base de faux documents par R.H.J. est frapp\u00e9e d\u2019une nullit\u00e9 absolue ;<\/p>\n

Que la Cour aurait d\u00fb au pr\u00e9alable ordonner une enqu\u00eate afin de constater l\u2019existence du faux soulev\u00e9 par le demandeur au pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

Vu le texte de loi vis\u00e9 au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la preuve de l\u2019existence de la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019inscription de faux soulev\u00e9e par le demandeur au pourvoi n'a pas rapport\u00e9e malgr\u00e9 le fait que plusieurs renvois lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9s en appel pour ce faire ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que I' appr\u00e9ciation de l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019enqu\u00eate rel\u00e8ve du pouvoir souverain des juges du fond et \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de Cassation ; Attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte du certificat de situation juridique d\u00e9livr\u00e9 le 12 f\u00e9vrier 2007 vers\u00e9 au dossier que la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse dite \u00ab Santatra CXII\u00bb titre foncier n\u00b055698-A sise \u00e0 Andraisoro appartient \u00e0 R.H.;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en statuant comme elle l\u2019a fait en faisant droit \u00e0 la demande d\u2019expulsion et de d\u00e9molition faite par le propri\u00e9taire en titre, la Cour d'Appel a bien appliqu\u00e9 la loi ; Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que le moyen unique de cassation n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

REJETTE le pourvoi ; Condamne le demandeur \u00e0 l'amende et aux d\u00e9pens. Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Foncier \/ Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Expulsion \u2013 D\u00e9molition \u2013 mesures pr\u00e9paratoires (enqu\u00eate) \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond C\u2019est \u00e0 juste titre que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019occupant et la d\u00e9molition des constructions entreprises en tirant les cons\u00e9quences juridiques de ses constatations, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019une…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,48966,21118,49306],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-793150","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-occupation","kji_keyword-pouvoir","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 - Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 - Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier \/ Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Expulsion \u2013 D\u00e9molition \u2013 mesures pr\u00e9paratoires (enqu\u00eate) \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond C\u2019est \u00e0 juste titre que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019occupant et la d\u00e9molition des constructions entreprises en tirant les cons\u00e9quences juridiques de ses constatations, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019une...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\\\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 - Occupation \\\/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T23:55:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\\\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 – Occupation \\\/ Pouvoir du juge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 - Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 - Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier \/ Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Expulsion \u2013 D\u00e9molition \u2013 mesures pr\u00e9paratoires (enqu\u00eate) \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond C\u2019est \u00e0 juste titre que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019occupant et la d\u00e9molition des constructions entreprises en tirant les cons\u00e9quences juridiques de ses constatations, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019une...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 - Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T23:55:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-6-avril-2018-663-12-co-n-131-occupation-pouvoir-du-juge-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 6 avril 2018, 663\/12-CO n\u00b0 131 – Occupation \/ Pouvoir du juge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/793150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=793150"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=793150"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=793150"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=793150"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=793150"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=793150"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=793150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}